By Kevin D. Williamson
Tuesday, August 30, 2022
Republicans really want to talk about Hunter Biden’s
laptop. Democrats want to talk about January 6. Every partisan has his favorite
story.
What if I told you, those are the same story?
They are, in a sense.
By the numbers, there isn’t much reason to care about
January 6. The Capitol architect estimates that property damage was something
around $3 million, and there were five deaths associated with that tornado of
rage, filth, and stupidity. In term of loss of life, the fiasco at Travis
Scott’s Astroworld show in Houston was twice as bad — ten dead — and, if you
ask the lawyers, the dollar damages were a whole lot worse: They’re currently
asking $3 billion in total, with 387 lawsuits from 2,800 alleged victims at
last count. (The dollar figures are not strictly comparable: The $3 billion in
damages sought in the Astroworld mess includes both property damage and bodily
injury.) But I care a lot more about January 6 than I do Astroworld, because —
this part matters! — it was an attempt to nullify a legitimate election and
thereby effect the overthrow of the government of these United States. I care
about that. There are lots of riots and lots of other crime. When those riots
take on a particular political character, they are of much
more urgent interest.
There are a lot of Hunter Biden types in the world, and I
don’t care about most of them. Coke and hookers and all that? I’m a libertarian
— that stuff isn’t very good for you, but I’m not inclined to throw anybody
into prison over it. Corrupt business practices? I’m not going to say those
don’t matter, but I’m a lot less fussy about that than many Americans are — I’m
not convinced insider trading should be a crime, for instance. There
are a lot of people who have gone to jail for financial crimes who shouldn’t
have, in my view: Michael Milken, Martha Stewart, Conrad Black. (I’d be more
inclined to put Baron Black of Crossharbour in a dungeon over that Trump book,
even if the Supreme Court legalized that kind of performance in Lawrence
vs. Texas.) There are a lot of idiot sons on a lot of corporate payrolls.
But there is reason to believe that Hunter Biden was accepting payments for
political favors secured through his father, and some reason to believe that he
was acting as a conduit for payments to his family that amounted to bribes.
There is very good reason to believe that Hunter Biden should have been charged
with other serious crimes — crimes for which people without his family connections have
been charged in similar circumstances. To be clear: There have been no such
charges filed, much less charges that have been proved beyond a reasonable
doubt in a court of law. But the Hunter Biden situation is serious in a way
that the shenanigans of your average moneyed and coddled and drug-addled
mediocrity are not — because of their political character.
I’m not really convinced that guys who peddle coke to
such idiots as Hunter Biden should go to prison at all. I am very much
convinced that politicians and members of their extended families who take
bribes, sell favors, or steer contracts to friends and family should be dropped
in the nearest oubliette for 20 years.
Where I disagree with some of my friends and colleagues
is in the fact that I want heightened attention to politically connected crimes
across the board. I think that those who argue that we should be gingerly about
investigating such figures as former president Donald Trump because such
investigations are bound to produce political convulsions are wrong on the
merits: Former presidents should be subjected to a higher degree of scrutiny
when it comes to illegal actions, not a lesser degree of scrutiny. If some nobody takes a bunch of classified documents home
without going through the proper channels, that nobody is liable to go to
prison. If we really mean what we say about equality before the law, then
we must not refuse to investigate a former president for a similar offense because
we are afraid that doing so will upset some people.
Not all riots are the same thing: Looting a sneaker store
is a serious crime and ought to be treated as such, but attempting to overturn
an election by means of violence is a very different sort of thing. Not all
useless rich-guy drug addicts are created equal, and neither are their crimes.
We should be more inclined to prosecute the powerful and the
connected, rather than less inclined.
Crimes of a political character erode the foundations of
the regime itself and as such are a menace more urgent and more general than
what might be suggested by the particular details of the crime itself. In Texas,
theft of less than $1,500 is a misdemeanor — but if Senator Bob steals $1 from
the Treasury, he needs to go to the least pleasant prison we have for a very
long time. A free society has to defend its institutions fiercely and with
great vigilance.
The real cost of corruption is much, much higher than the
value of the money that changes hands. The cost is high even when no money
changes hands.
No comments:
Post a Comment