National Review Online
Thursday, August 25, 2022
‘President Biden announces student loan relief for
borrowers who need it most,” says the White House.
Every part of that sentence is wrong.
“President Biden announces” — not really. If there were
ever a time when Biden’s progressive supporters are ventriloquizing the
president, this is it. Biden is, of course, fully culpable as the man with whom
the buck stops. But student-loan forgiveness is a policy that has been
announced time and again by radical progressives on the Internet for over two
years — and pretty much nobody else.
The issue does not rate highly among voters in general,
who are overwhelmingly concerned with inflation. Loan forgiveness certainly will
not help inflation, and 59 percent of Americans and even an Obama economist are concerned it will make
inflation worse. The median American adult does not have any student debt
because the median American adult never borrowed any money to go to college.
Only 37.9 percent of Americans over the age of 25 even have
a bachelor’s degree or higher.
After about a year and a half of online harassment from
the sliver of the population for whom this policy is beneficial, Biden has
allowed himself to be bullied into violating the Constitution on their behalf. Even Nancy Pelosi has said the president doesn’t have
the power to forgive student debt. His staff, which collectively owes millions in student debt, will no
doubt be happy. But the presidency is the one office for which the entire
country votes, and for it to be captured by a progressive fringe is a travesty.
“Student loan relief” — again, not really. “Relief”
implies the disappearance of a malady, but this is merely a transference. Biden’s
student-loan plan will cost about $2,000 per taxpayer. It completely erases the purported (and exaggerated) deficit reduction of the reconciliation
bill Biden signed just over a week ago.
Biden is effectively telling all the people who didn’t go
to college, those who went to college but didn’t borrow money, and those who
went to college and already paid off their loans that they are suckers. The lucky few who just so happen to have
student debt at this arbitrary moment get a windfall at the expense of everyone
else.
“For borrowers” — wrong. Borrowers are people who are
given money by lenders under the expectation that it will be paid back over a
period of time, subject to the terms of a contract. Biden has taken what was
supposed to be a loan and turned it into a gift. Those who benefit are recipients of
government largesse, not borrowers.
Federal student loans are already issued on very
favorable terms. For the vast majority of people who receive them, it’s a
fantastic deal. They get to increase their lifetime earnings, often
by millions of dollars, by taking out a loan at the age of 18 at far below
the market rate of interest. The least they can do is pay it back.
Forty-five percent of bachelor’s-degree recipients
graduate with no debt at all. Only 7 percent of those who do borrow have an outstanding
balance over $100,000, and 54 percent owe less than $20,000. The horror stories
that get such outsize attention often represent people who made poor financial
decisions. Harsh, perhaps, but there are any number of ordinary Americans who
make different poor financial decisions all the time, and they aren’t going to
have their debts forgiven by the government. What makes people who went to
college more deserving?
“Who need it most” — no. There is no possible definition
of “need” in which college graduates in the United States of America would rank
first.
Workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher have an unemployment rate of 2 percent and only saw their
unemployment rate spike to 8.4 percent during the pandemic, compared with 17.6
percent for high-school graduates with no college. The order caps those
eligible for loan forgiveness at $125,000 in individual income, which is
approximately double the median household income and hardly
excludes anyone. Forty-seven percent of federal loans go to graduate
students, who will in many cases make six figures upon entering the workforce.
“Radical progressives violate Constitution and statute to
further enrich the well-off at the expense of everyone else” would be a more
accurate way to state what the president has done. He has yet again abused emergency powers to pursue a reckless
and senseless policy.
To the extent it is possible, the order must be
challenged in court and hindered by every legal means available. Republicans
have rightly blasted the move, with Senate minority leader Mitch
McConnell calling it a “slap in the face to working Americans.” They should
devote the time from now to Election Day exposing this grotesque giveaway to
voters and reasserting reality: The U.S. president is not an omnipotent genie
placed behind the Resolute desk to grant partisan wishes by the stroke of his
pen.
No comments:
Post a Comment