By Tom Cotton
& Ken Buck
Wednesday, June
30, 2021
Parents across the country are
revolting against activist school boards and teachers who are
introducing critical race theory and propagandistic accounts of
American history into classrooms.
One such history is the New York
Times’ 1619 Project, which is already being taught in at least 4,000
classrooms in all 50 states.
The 1619 Project is an alternate history
of the American founding that claims our nation’s true birthday was not 1776
but 1619, the year 20 slaves arrived in the British colony of Virginia.
According to the 1619 Project, America was founded on racism and slavery —
never mind the text of the Declaration of Independence, which proclaims that
all men are created equal, or the words and deeds of our Founding Fathers, many
of whom deplored slavery and tried to place it on the path to ultimate
extinction.
The 1619 Project avoids discussing how
slavery clashed with the ideals expressed in our Declaration of Independence.
Instead, it portrays our Founding Fathers as liars and frauds who did not
believe the stirring words they wrote — and in fact wrote them to uphold the
evils of human bondage and white supremacy.
Unsurprisingly, Democrats and liberals
have lavished praise on this revisionist account of our history. The 1619
Project’s lead author, Nikole Hannah-Jones, won a Pulitzer Prize and quickly
hit the lecture circuit. Then-Senator Kamala Harris quickly expressed her support, writing that “the #1619Project is a powerful and
necessary reckoning of our history. We cannot understand and address the
problems of today without speaking truth about how we got here.”
The response from actual historians, even
many on the left, has been less favorable. The project is “so wrong in so many
ways,” according to Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Gordon Wood. James McPherson,
the dean of Civil War historians and a Pulitzer Prize winner himself, remarked
that the project presents an “unbalanced, one-sided account” that “left most of
the history out.” A history curriculum that leaves the history out? No wonder
parents are upset.
Young Americans are in desperate need of
history and civic education, as surveys often find that they do not know basic
details about our history and system of government. The 1619 Project will not
help Americans achieve greater historical literacy or a deeper appreciation of
our nation’s Founding, which truly is the greatest political experiment in
human history. Instead, students who are exposed to the 1619 Project will learn
to despise their country and their fellow citizens. That is a recipe for
division and disaster.
In response to parents’ concerns about the
1619 Project and critical race theory, we have introduced a bill to prevent
federal funding from being used to teach the 1619 Project in K–12 schools. This
bill, titled the Saving American History Act, would not prevent any local
school from making decisions about what curriculum they wish to teach — but it
would state firmly that federal taxpayer dollars cannot be used to teach a malicious
lie that threatens to divide the country on the basis of race.
America’s students deserve to know the
true story of our nation’s Founding, and to be able to grapple with, and
debate, the difficult questions in our history. That story includes many great
and noble chapters, from the abolition of slavery and Civil Rights Movement to
the moon landing and the liberation of Europe from Nazi tyranny. It also
includes many dark chapters where our nation has failed to live up to our own
noble principles. Teachers ought to present this history in its full glory and
tragedy, making clear how our Founding principles have inspired generations of
patriots and reformers.
Truthful discussions never begin with
lies. The 1619 Project is founded on a lie. It has no place in our nation’s
schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment