By Sean-Michael
Pigeon
Tuesday, June
15, 2021
The ProPublica tax leaks have shaken up the business world and
led to a flurry of cries to overhaul the tax system. Many have increased their
calls for a wealth tax, arguing that billionaires can flaunt the
rules ordinary Americans have to abide by. But people across the political
spectrum should all be concerned by the rhetoric coming from the left. Recent
events show some on the left won’t be satisfied until the entire billionaire
class is eliminated.
Liberals have waged war on businessmen for
decades, so the recent attacks on the wealthy are hardly surprising. In the
past, liberals would point to individual instances of corporate greed running
amok, or of corporations knowingly putting profits above all else.
Inconveniently for those on the left, the leaked documents show that the
billionaires in question followed the letter of the law. Unable to claim that
their actions were illegal, left-wing rhetoric has changed. Thus, the system
itself is now attacked as illegitimate, and abiding by the law is no defense
for the crime of being too wealthy.
Two articles from the New York
Times in the last week show just how profound this change is. First, a
guest article published yesterday by Anand Giridharadas explicitly argues that
there is no such thing as a “Good Billionaire.” Giridharadas specifically targets
Warren Buffett, a generous philanthropist who plans to give away his fortune upon his death. Some
might say that is noble and generous, an example of how social pressure and a
desire for a legacy incentivize good behavior. For the Left, though, it’s just
another example of privileged power.
A New York Times interview of Jesse Eisinger, one of the
journalists who broke the tax leaks, further shows how antagonistic the left is
to wealth. The interviewer, Kara Swisher, threatened that either the wealthy
would have to give their money to Washington, D.C., or that they’re “going to
have to armor plate [their] Teslas.” We shouldn’t shrug off her comments or
believe Swisher is joking. Swisher specifically said, “That’s my argument to
them,” and that she says it all the time. She is not outright advocating
violence against the ultra-wealthy; she is saying, however, that such a thing
is inevitable if they do not do what she wants. And she is not alone on the left.
Many among the ultra-wealthy are misguided
if they believe that donating to leftist causes will shield them from criticism.
Eisinger remarks that Buffett’s strategy of planning his private philanthropic
endeavors instead of sending checks to the federal government is like wanting
to control your tax dollars. Instead of reaching the conservative position on
taxes, though, Eisinger believes this means philanthropy by the wealthy is
problematic.
Giridharadas echoes this sentiment. Warren
Buffet may help millions with their charitable donations, but they help
legitimize a system “that allows a man to accumulate more than $100 billion.”
The whole system is a problem, and wealthy people are a symptom. Even Bill
Gates is not spared. These pieces should serve as a warning that the ultra-rich
cannot win the left’s approval because many on the left are ideologically opposed to
their very existence. As former policy adviser for Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez likes to say, “Every billionaire is a policy
failure.”
This line of thinking is based on the idea
that highly profitable businesses are always predatory. But many companies
(such as the New York Times, for instance) relied on Amazon and other tech companies to keep the power on during the
pandemic. “Working remotely” was only feasible for some because of these innovations.
Villainizing company leaders for “hoarding” their wealth by owning soaring
company stock is downright absurd.
This matters for those of us who make less
than eight figures, too. Giridharadas, Eisinger, and Swisher are not fringe theorists, and we cannot ignore
the radical implications of their thinking. The left asks why the IRS can’t “claw back” more money from billionaires, and they
won’t stop if the rich hand over just a bit more to the government. If
following the rules and doing charity work doesn’t protect the rich and
powerful, it won’t protect those of us who don’t have
billion-dollar companies. The rich, poor, and middle class should all stand
united against this brave new world.
No comments:
Post a Comment