National Review Online
Friday, January 22, 2021
Joe Biden went out of his way on his first day in office
to cancel Donald Trump’s 1776 Commission.
Established to research and promote patriotic education,
the commission was a welcome initiative — while it lasted.
It sought to counterbalance the hostile view of American
history advanced by the “1619 Project,” which jumped almost directly from the
pages of the New York Times to the
curriculum in schools around the country. That project made basic historical
errors that it corrected only grudgingly and under pressure from some of the
foremost historians in the country, absurdly argued for 1619 — the first year
that African slaves were brought to these shores — as the “true” founding of
the country (before subsequently editing out this claim without explanation),
and distorted the American Revolution, Abraham Lincoln, and the history of
slavery, among other things.
Perversely, the Times
in effect revived the argument of the likes of John C. Calhoun that the
Declaration of Independence was a lie, only from a woke 21st-century
perspective.
In the blink of an eye, the 1619 Project re-oriented the
discussion about American history.
During its brief life, the 1776 commission tried to
re-center it (and attempted to do so, it’s worth noting, simply by providing
information to the public, not by interfering in curricular decisions of states
and localities).
The contents of the 1776 Commission’s report, released
earlier this week, should be uncontroversial. As the authors write in its
introduction, its purpose is to “enable a rising generation to understand the
history and principles of the founding of the United States in 1776 and to
strive to form a more perfect Union.” It starts by outlining in fairly
incontrovertible terms the political principles of both the Declaration of
Independence and of the Constitution. The report then discusses the obstacles
that stood in the way of the Founding vision’s realization and how they were
overcome. There is no whitewashing of slavery, nor any suggestion that the
moral fabric of the early republic was without hideous stains. The authors
merely insist along with Lincoln, whom they quote, that the purpose of the
Constitution as ratified in 1787 was “to declare the right, so that the
enforcement of it might follow as fast as circumstances should permit.”
Most of the report focuses on recounting how these
circumstances were brought about by heroic figures such as Frederick Douglass and
Martin Luther King. For these men, the words of Jefferson and Madison were the
swords and the shields wielded against the enemies of the American creed. To
observe the continuity that exists from the victory of 1776 to those of 1865
and 1964 is merely to take great Americans like Douglass and King at their
word.
Much of the fire directed at the 1776 report has been
directed at the decision to loosely group “Progressivism” and “Identity
Politics” alongside “Fascism” and “Communism” in a section titled “Challenges
to America’s Principles.” But the report’s discussion correctly states
early-20th-century Progressivism’s disregard for the Founding and
constitutional government, and regarding identity politics, obviously neither
Louis Farrakhan nor David Duke thinks much of the notion that “all men are
created equal.”
That President Biden acted so swiftly against the commission is another sign of how desperately we need voices to combat what is rapidly becoming the new orthodoxy about American history.
No comments:
Post a Comment