By David Harsanyi
Thursday, January 14, 2021
During yesterday’s vote to impeach President Trump a
second time, CNN host Jake Tapper described
Congressman Brian Mast as “a Republican from Florida — who lost his legs, by
the way, fighting for democracy abroad, although I don’t know . . . about his
commitment to it here in the United States.” This sounds like pretty Trumpy
rhetoric to me, the kind that I’m told corrodes the foundations of comity and
civil society, etc.
Unlike many of Tapper’s critics, I don’t think veterans
such as Mast, who was injured by an IED in Afghanistan, deserve any special
dispensation from criticism during a political debate, especially this one.
Then again, they probably deserve not to be slandered as a traitor by a
television personality who spent four years undercutting public trust in the
2016 election.
When Mast confronted Tapper, the CNN host questioned
“the commitment to democracy of anyone who spread election lies, signed onto
that deranged TX AG lawsuit, and voted to commit sedition. You were not just
asking questions.”
How exactly does one vote “to commit sedition”?
What other congressional procedures and lawsuits does Tapper consider to be
treasonous?
Rioters carrying zip ties into the Capitol building,
threatening lawmakers, murdering a police officer, and disrupting democracy are
surely a better fit for the “seditious” label. Not only for the obvious
reasons, but also because their grievances were being heard even as they turned
violent. However, casting objections in Congress or taking your gripes to a
court might be extraordinarily wrongheaded, completely ridiculous, or
politically destructive — as I believe the objections to certifying Joe Biden’s
win were — but lawful opposition and working within the system are not sedition
by any conception. Unless you believe the system itself allows for this kind of
perfidy.
Tapper’s absurd position reminds me of MAGA fans who
passionately claim that impeachment — a mechanism in the Constitution — is
somehow unpatriotic. Donald Trump’s post-election behavior was deeply
irresponsible, conspiratorial, unpresidential, and incited — not in the legal
sense, but in the moral one — a lot of the anger we saw last Wednesday.
Congress has every right to remove him. And Mast has every right to vote “no.”
If his constituents don’t like it, they can find someone else to represent
them. That’s democracy.
Or is it only “democracy” if lawmakers vote in a way Jake
Tapper approves?
I’d say the Capitol riot has given license to liberals to
smear Republicans as traitors, but Democrats have been calling them KGB foot
soldiers since 2016. In a discussion with CNN personality Chris Cuomo, Tapper’s
colleague Don Lemon said that the 75 million or so Americans who voted for
Trump made
common cause with the Klan and rioters. Not long ago, Cuomo was comparing
Antifa to
the GIs at Normandy on D-Day and justifying violent leftist political
riots. Does Cuomo really believe the firebombing of federal buildings or the
earlier murder
of five police officers by a BLM activist were just “outbursts”?
Fordham Law doesn’t make
them like they used to.
MSNBC’s Joy Reid talks about the necessity for
“de-Baathifying” the Republican Party. The Nobel prize–winning New York
Times columnist Paul Krugman expands on the idea, noting that the Capitol
riot was a “putsch” decades in the making. (Is there anything Reagan
couldn’t do?!) Krugman’s colleague Nicholas Kristof, whose editorial page
argued that rioting wasn’t violence, says
Fox News needs to be shut down because it’s one of many right-wing “extremist
madrasas.”
Everyone is guilty, by this logic. And it all leads to
Democrats such as Ron Wyden and others arguing that the path to national
healing is for Republicans to get on board with the Democratic agenda. “The
Only Way to Save Democracy,” says a left-wing activist at Slate, is to
completely dismantle constitutional protections for red states so Republicans
never win another election.
If the impeachment of Trump were a good-faith effort to
defend the sanctity of our democracy, liberals wouldn’t be reverting to
partisan form so quickly.
Joe Scarborough, who worked more diligently, and more
obsequiously, than perhaps anyone in media to help elect Donald Trump, now runs
around casually accusing
senators of treason. I get that it’s likely hyperbole — in his case, almost
surely about ratings — but I wonder how many Democrats actually believe Josh
Hawley deserves
the death penalty? Do they know what “treason” would mean?
Now, I’ve been told that mentioning these double
standards so close to the Capitol riot is a no-no. But those who condemn all
rioting, and all lies undermining public faith in our elections, should be able
to proceed without concerning themselves about accusations of “whataboutism” or
charges of hypocrisy.
This group does not include Jake Tapper. Or Ron Wyden. Or
Paul Krugman. Or Don Lemon. Or Joe Scarborough. Or Joy Reid. Or scores of other
politicos who believe they can smear or insinuate that their opponents are
traitors.
No comments:
Post a Comment