By Jim Geraghty
Wednesday, January 27, 2021
President Biden made it clear that stopping the
coronavirus pandemic was his top priority upon taking office, and the American
people are likely to largely judge his presidency upon that, at least for the
next year or so. The president is getting deserved grief
for the difference between his late October
promise, “I’m
not going to shut down the economy, I’m not going to shut down the country, I’m
going to shut down the virus,” and his assessment of a “dark winter” and
recent assessment that “there’s nothing we can do to change the trajectory of
the pandemic in the next several months.”
Q: Now that you’re
president, you’re saying there’s nothing we can do to change the trajectory of
the pandemic in the next several months. What happened to two months ago when
you were talking declaratively about, ‘I am going to shut down the virus’?
Biden: Well, I’m going to
shut down the virus, but not — I never said I’d do it in two months. I said it
took a long time to get here. It’s going to take a long time to beat it, and so
we have millions of people out there who are who have the virus.
Biden and his team are slightly backtracking from the
claims in that CNN report, with some unnamed official contending, “There
is nothing for us to rework. We are going to have to build everything from
scratch.” But only slightly, as Biden said yesterday:
It’s also no secret that we have
recently discovered, in the final days of the transition — and it wasn’t until
the final days we got the kind of cooperation we needed — that once we arrived,
the vaccine program is worse shape than we anticipated or expected. A lot of you who follow this — and nobody is
— I mean this sincerely, the press is the smartest group of people in town; you
hone this stuff down, clearly — I think you found the same thing.
I expect we’ll hear the “we didn’t get enough
cooperation” excuse from the Biden team a lot; please
read Tobias Hoonhout and Ryan Mills’s reporting on the transition briefings and
meetings between the administration. “We provided the Biden team over 300
transition meetings, including the very first one on Warp Speed which I kicked
off myself,” former Health and Human Services chief of staff Brian Harrison
told National Review. “The idea that they’re walking in, having no clue
what was going on, is absolutely preposterous.”
Also, recall
how Dr. Anthony Fauci characterized what the Biden team inherited, six days ago:
Q: President Biden said that
what was left was “abysmal,” essentially. Is there anything actionable that you
are taking from the previous administration to move it forward? And is that
delaying your efforts to get the vaccine?
I mean, that’s the question that —
FAUCI: No, I mean, we’re
coming in with fresh ideas, but also some ideas that were not bad ideas with
the — with the previous administration.
You can’t say it was absolutely not usable at all. So, we are
continuing, but you’re going to see a real ramping-up of it.
In today’s Washington Post, Peter Hotez, the
co-director of the Texas Children’s Center for Vaccine Development, argues
that the Biden administration is still doing too little, too slowly:
I do not see how giving 500 million
shots to Americans by this summer will be met with the current projections for
scaling production of the two mRNA vaccines or even those in addition to the
Johnson & Johnson adenovirus vaccine that the Food and Drug Administration
is expected to authorize for emergency use soon.
We also need the AstraZeneca-Oxford
(AzOx) adenovirus vaccine, which has been authorized in Argentina, the
Dominican Republic, El Salvador, India, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan, Sri Lanka
and Britain. The United States has delayed emergency use authorization even
though it has already purchased a 300 million-dose guarantee from the company.
On Friday, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) will rule on the AzOx vaccine.
The EMA has been reviewing the company’s dossier since Jan. 12. Both our FDA
and the EMA are considered the world’s two premier regulatory agencies. If the
EMA rules in favor of releasing the AzOx vaccine, I believe we have no choice
but to do the same to quickly expand our vaccine supply.
We’re going to hear variations of “Biden’s only been on
the job for a week!” Never mind Biden’s repeated promises that his
administration, and his
pandemic response team in particular, would be “ready from day one” and
“already ready to jump in.” The counter-question is, when is it fair to
judge Biden on the decisions he’s made regarding the pandemic while in office?
After two weeks? A month? Two months? 100 days?
As you can see from the elaborate promise on the campaign
trail and the much more modest projection once elected, Biden hasn’t shaken his
old malarkey habits. When he’s got an audience in front of him, he wants to
please them and generate roaring applause. Biden has told environmentalist
protesters or supporters that he wants to “end fossil fuels,” “get rid of fossil fuels,”
“phase out fossil fuel
production,” and “ban fossil fuel exports.” There is a pattern that
whenever Biden is challenged on being insufficiently committed to the green
agenda, he insists he agrees with his critic. And then when called out for
those comments, Biden insists he never said what he said.
In one of his debates against President Trump, Biden said
he would transition away from the oil industry, and then his staff has to rush
in and explain he only meant subsidies for the oil industry. He declared, “I
will not ban fracking. Period.” And then he banned fracking on federal
lands.
The unofficial slogan of the Biden presidency is, “Well,
he didn’t mean it that way.”
No comments:
Post a Comment