By Jim Geraghty
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Large swaths of the national media are still thrilled
that the Biden administration is not the Trump administration, gushing in news
chyrons about “how refreshing” it is.
The Biden administration is reinstating and expanding
travel bans in response to new variants of SARS-CoV-2, which is likely to be
the right policy move. But it does cut against Biden’s campaign
trail declaration that “banning all travel from Europe — or any other part
of the world — will not stop it” or Biden labeling the
previous administration’s restrictions on entries from China “xenophobic
fear-mongering” and “hysterical
xenophobia,” and White House press secretary Jen Psaki insists these new
travel bans do not represent a contradiction of Biden’s rhetoric on the
campaign trail.
Yesterday, Psaki gave
a non-answer when asked about CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky’s bizarre
claim, “I can’t tell you how much vaccine we have.”
Q: But just to button this up:
[U.S. Army General and chief operating officer of Operation Warp Speed] Gus
Perna still works here, right? And he’s
in charge of the logistics. So could he
say how much vaccine there is, since they’re in charge of where it’s going?
MS. PSAKI: Well, again, there is a new CDC Director in
charge (inaudible) spoke to this. And I
think what we’re trying to do now is fully assess what we have access to, what
the status of the vaccine supply looks like, and ensure that we’re communicating
that accurately and effectively with the public.
It appears the Biden administration does not know whether
it supports a free trade deal with the United Kingdom or not:
Q And on the UK, we know, over the weekend,
President Biden had a phone call with Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and Mr.
Johnson said they talked about the free trade deal. However, from the White
House readout, we don’t see that. Does
the President support the free trade deal with the UK?
MS. PSAKI: I haven’t talked to him or Jake Sullivan
about that. I’ll venture to do that and
see if I can get more for you on it.
(Also note that yesterday Psaki declared, “We’re starting
from an approach of patience as it relates to our relationship with China.”
When we examine the Chinese government’s decisions and actions over the past
year or more, has Beijing really earned “patience” from the U.S. government? Is
the problem really that we’ve been too impatient with China?)
So, yes, it is just swell that Jen Psaki is nicer than
Kayleigh McEnany and that reporters find her easier to deal with than Stephanie
Grisham or Sarah Huckabee Sanders. But on that widely touted pledge to share
more accurate information, Psaki is getting graded on a generous curve.
Far too generous.
No comments:
Post a Comment