By Michael Brendan Dougherty
Wednesday, July 08, 2020
I thought it right to congratulate John MacArthur and Harper’s
magazine on putting together an open letter
in defense of intellectual liberty — including the liberty to make mistakes —
as a necessary component of social justice. And further congrats on assembling
its broad church of signatories.
MacArthur and Harper’s have always occupied an
interesting position in the intellectual firmament, and probably find
themselves as surprised as anyone to be defending their left flank in 2020. Harper’s
has won scrapes in this fight recently when a preemptive pre-publication strike
was made against their contributor Katie Rophie and her article questioning
some shibboleths of the MeToo movement.
At first, I thought this open letter was a futile gesture
against the inevitable. My expectation was that the “free speech” liberals
would be routed and overwhelmed in the trend-leading institutions of media such
as the New York Times and The Atlantic.
But now I’m not so sure. These seem like battle lines
being drawn among the cultural and intellectual forces of the left ahead of the
Biden years. And the longer I stare at the list of signatories, the more
impressed I am. Are we really going to cancel the likes of John Banville,
Salman Rushdie, and J. K. Rowling?
Possibly! I think much of cancel culture is driven by
revenge of mediocrities. Many of the “cancelers” are tragic; the adults and
institutions that were charged with giving them a decent moral and academic
education in their childhoods just failed utterly or abandoned the work. And so
the cancelers are totally unequipped to deal with things like mature
disagreement, bearing wrongs patiently, and negotiating with adults who don’t
give them what they want the moment they cry or scream for it. Because it is
born of a bottomless hole of insecurity, it should have bottomless energy.
But for the first time in a long time, it looks like there is some resistance where it matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment