By Jonathan Marks
Friday, January 10, 2020
Last Saturday, President Donald Trump claimed that the
U.S. had selected “52 Iranian sites” as targets in the event of Iran striking
Americans or American assets. That number, 52, is symbolic as it represents the
number of U.S. hostages Iran took captive in 1979. Some of the sites, he
warned, are important to “the Iranian culture.” The President backed off soon
enough, but not before his suggestion that the U.S. might blow up cultural
treasures provoked a stream of outraged comments.
Among the less outraged of those was a Facebook post by
Asheen Phansey, an adjunct professor and an administrator at Babson College in
Massachusetts. On his Facebook page, Phansey made a dumb, snobbish, joke less
about bombs than American culture: “In retaliation, Ayatollah Khomeini [sic.]
should tweet a list of 52 sites of beloved American cultural heritage that he
would bomb. Um . . . Mall of America? . . . Kardashian residence?”
Only malice or foolishness could make of this attempt at
humor a call to bomb the Mall of America, the Kardashian residence, or any
American site. But there is no shortage of malicious or foolish people.
As Hank Reichman, an emeritus professor of history and an
authority on academic freedom explains, Phansey’s post got noticed by Turtleboy
Sports, a site that, among other things, regularly assails “social justice
warriors.” “Uncle Turtleboy” asserted that Phansey was begging “a religious
lunatic who oppresses women and gay people to blow up American cultural sites.”
But then, that’s “par for the course for your run of the mill college professor
in 2020.” Moreover, the post concluded, Phansey once owned a Prius!
In a subsequent post, our intrepid blogger claims that
Phansey’s “page was private, so we only were able to get those screenshots via
a mole.” But soon enough, Phansey’s comment was circulating on social media and
got picked up by the Boston Herald.
Phansey subsequently apologized for his “bad attempt at humor: “As an American,
born and raised, I was trying to juxtapose our ‘cultural sites’ with ancient
Iranian churches and mosques,” he wrote. “I am completely opposed to violence
and would never advocate it by anyone.”
But that didn’t save his job. By Thursday, Babson College
had fired him from his administrative and teaching positions. The post, said
the College, “does not represent the values and culture of the College.” Babson
condemns “any type of threatening words and/or actions condoning violence
and/or hate.”
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE),
a nonpartisan organization often mislabeled as conservative because its care
for freedom of speech, assembly, and religion extends to conservative students
and professors, has taken up Phansey’s cause. Adam Steinbaugh, the director of
FIRE’s Individual Rights Defense Program, writes that Phansey’s post was “quite
obviously a criticism—not endorsement—of threats of violence, mixed with snark
about American culture.”
Even if Phansey had been serious, there is no world in
which his comment constituted a “true threat” or “incitement,” categories of
speech that can be restricted under the First Amendment. It’s true that Babson
College is a private institution, unbound by the First Amendment. And the
academic protections Babson claims to stand by extends less to administrators
than to faculty. But the idea that Phansey could be bounced from his job over a
mild joke on a private page should worry even those who don’t care for the joke
or the politics implied in it.
Babson College seems to have given in to a social media
storm, and presumably to complaints they received as a result. Such a storm can
target anyone. Conservatives and liberals alike have something to fear from
timid administrators who are willing to tarnish the professional reputations of
professors just to avoid some bad publicity.
Phansey’s ordeal is reminiscent of the 2018 case of James
Livingston, a professor of history at Rutgers who, in an “expletive-laced”
Facebook rant about gentrification at the restaurant Harlem Shake, made the
mistake of saying, “Ok, officially I now hate white people.” Livingston himself
is white, but the Office of Employment Equity at Rutgers determined that he had
“violated the university’s discrimination and harassment policy” and that a
“reasonable student may have concerns that he or she would be stigmatized in
his classes because of his or her race.”
Rutgers soon reversed the finding. But it was pressed
into making the initial complaints by negative media coverage in outlets like The Daily Caller and Fox News. There is nothing wrong with covering
Livingston’s tantrum. But there is a lot wrong with university officials caving
to mobs, whether those mobs chase the left or the right.
Rutgers, in the end, did the right thing. Babson College
should, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment