By Kevin D. Williamson
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
The Denver Post has fired the wrong person. It
should can its incompetent opinion editor, Megan Schrader.
The story (told by our Madeleine Kearns here) is this:
Jon Caldara of the Denver-based Independence Institute had long written a
weekly column for the Denver Post, but was fired over taking an
objectionable view on a trans issue — an issue of transparency.
In a column arguing for greater openness in public affairs, he excoriated the
Colorado legislature for avoiding the legally required referendum on a new
state tax by repackaging it as a “fee” — and then prohibiting hospitals from
listing the fee on patients’ bills. On the same theme, he criticized the
state’s educational authorities for imposing a speech code forbidding speech
considered “stigmatizing” by the self-appointed tribunes of the various sexual
tribes. “In case you hadn’t noticed,” he wrote, “just about everything is
stigmatizing to the easily triggered, perpetually offended.” Continuing on his
theme of transparency, he also complained that the schools were not doing
enough to make parents aware of the contents of their curricula.
And so Megan Schrader of the Denver Post gave Jon
Caldara the shoe.
The alleged newspaper published a note in which it
affirmed with po-faced sincerity that it wishes to cover a “variety of subjects
and feature a variety of voices, even when some of our readers find them
offensive,” which is a transparent and obvious lie, as is the subsequent
disclaimer: “We believe it is both possible and desirable to write about
sensitive subjects and about people with whom one disagrees using respectful
language.” The Caldara column can be read in full here.
The language is entirely unobjectionable. Caldara was not fired for using a
slur — he was fired for affirming his belief that H. sap. is an animal
that comes in two sexes.
I know how he feels: After one of the familiar hysterias
by the ridiculous ninnies who make their living and fill their empty hours in
this way, the editors of the Chicago Sun-Times announced that they were
severing their relationship with me — a relationship that I had not been aware
of, as it turns out, because I’ve never had any kind of professional
association with that newspaper, which simply reprinted work of mine from National
Review on its own initiative. That was vexing: Normally, a respectable
publication has to put up a few hundred thousand dollars for the privilege of
firing me.
I am not much of a believer in firing people for having
unpopular views, even naughty ones. And I do not think that the Denver Post’s
Megan Schrader should be fired for taking the wrong view here. She
should be fired because she is incompetent, i.e., unable to do the thing that a
newspaper editor is supposed to do. If the opinion pages of the Denver Post
cannot be used to present and discuss the views of people in Denver, then what,
exactly, is the point of those pages? She doesn’t belong in a newspaper job for
the same reason she doesn’t belong in the National Football League: She can’t
do the job.
Lee Ann Colacioppo, the Denver Post’s editor, and
Heath Freeman, the hedge-fund dork who ultimately is the money here, ought to
be embarrassed of hiring such incompetents in the first place. But that is par
for the course among American newspaper managements in the 21st century:
Wall-to-wall cretins, cretins stacked high, cretins all the way down. (Freeman,
I should note in the interest of full disclosure, acquired the wreckage of Journal
Register, where I once worked and knew to be the largest collection of
witless, gormless, gutless, clueless excuses for newspaper publishers in North
America.) A newspaper that as a matter of editorial policy refuses to carry out
the ordinary functions of a newspaper is not likely to be much of an asset in the
long run.
The culture of inconsolable childish hysteria that
characterizes much social-media discourse and practically the whole of the
transgender-rights movement is not new, although outlets such as Twitter have
made it easier to communicate.
Narrow-minded stupidity and intolerance are human norms,
not human outliers: See, for example, the current campaign to bully liberal
defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz over his decision to take a case with a
high-profile client: Donald Trump, in this case. “Why did Alan Dershowitz Say
Yes to Trump?” demands the New York Times headline. Presumably for the
same reason he said “Yes” to Claus von Bülow and O. J. Simpson: Because he’s
good at his job, likes doing it, and is not in any obvious way averse to
the money and attention and other rewards that go along with that. A
presidential impeachment is a pretty interesting case to be on the defending
end of, I would think. Why would he say anything other than “Yes”? Why
would any comparable talent (his critics by and large are not comparable
talents) decline such a case? He’s a defense attorney: Cooties are an
occupational hazard.
And that, of course, sheds some light on the fiasco at
the Denver Post. The newspaper already has been gutted, and it is edited
by third-rate journalists because the first-rate and second-rate have better
offers. (Irrespective of Jon Caldara’s particular merits, as a former newspaper
editor, I can tell you that filling your pages with the work of think-tankers
and political hacks, who work for cheap or for free, is one of the things you
do when you don’t have the money to hire top-notch columnists.) Maybe that’s a
business plan that makes sense to somebody.
But any sensible person (and there are a few of those
left in Denver, under its dank cloud of marijuana smoke) would have to ask:
What other political positions are mandatory as terms of employment at the Denver
Post? What other thoughts are unthinkable? Perhaps Megan Schrader could
publish a list for prospects.
And if you’re wondering what the point of that might be,
you might also ask yourself what, exactly, is the point of the Denver Post,
which is at this moment far from obvious.
No comments:
Post a Comment