By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, October 12, 2018
You wouldn’t think that pop princess Taylor Swift would
have that much in common with punk-rock elder statesman Henry Rollins . . .
A few right-leaning Taylor Swift fans in my life
expressed a little dismay — but no surprise — about the gifted singer and
songwriter (and pretty good banjo-picker) and her decision to dunk herself in
the muck of the upcoming election with a dopey and illiterate diatribe against
Senator Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.). Swift had previously kept quiet about her
political opinions, possibly in keeping with Michael Jordan’s advice
(“Republicans buy sneakers, too,” he said) and possibly in the knowledge that
there isn’t any particular reason anybody should give an especial damn about
the political views of celebrities. She had been from time to time criticized
for declining to use her celebrity as a pulpit for warm-mush chardonnay
liberalism of the familiar variety offered up by American celebrities. The ego
can only resist so much temptation.
I kept that in mind last night at the Kessler Theater in
Dallas, where Henry Rollins — the punk-rock wild man who has in his fifties
evolved into something somewhere between stand-up comedian and lecturer (I
cannot write the words “spoken-word artist” without wincing) — was putting on a
peculiar performance. Rollins has concluded his career as a musician: “I put up
my fists and there was no longer anything there,” he wrote in LA Weekly, where he is a regular
columnist. “It was heartbreaking, but it was clear. Music had moved on.” But it
has been a long time since music was his primary outlet. He has been an actor
in films of varying quality (from Heat
to Johnny Mnemonic), a writer of bad
verse and good prose, and a much-admired public conversationalist. At the
moment, he is touring with a slide-show presentation about his extensive
travels over the years, from crossing Russia on the Trans-Siberian Express (he
edited Johnny Ramone’s memoir, Commando,
during those long stretches of monotonous tundra) to enduring a North Korean
propaganda junket, and venturing into Afghanistan and Iraq as a USO performer.
It is difficult not to like Henry Rollins. He’d bristle
at the wording, but he is an all-American success story, as good an example of
the Protestant work ethic as you might ever hope to encounter. He is bracingly
straightforward about what made the difference in his life: “I don’t have
talent. I have tenacity.” And one bit of good fortune: When he was a young man
scooping chocolate-chip cookie-dough ice cream into cones at a Häagen-Dazs shop
in Georgetown, his favorite band, Black Flag, found itself with an opening for
a singer, and invited him — an enthusiastic fan with little performing
experience — to come up to New York to audition for the role. He ran through
the set and had the job ten minutes later. He is probably the closest thing to
a genuine rock star as the American punk scene ever produced. The most radical
thing about him is that after spending his life marinating in a pop culture
thick with jaded knowingness and ironic distancing, he remains entirely
earnest.
The usual contradictions are there: Rollins is an
anti-capitalist who has paid the bills with everything from Hollywood movies to
modeling for the Gap, a creature of the underground who made it big on MTV,
back when MTV was a thing. The son of an economist (Paul Garfield, the author
of Public Utility Economics), Rollins
grew up in Potomac, Md., attended a pretty fancy prep school (Bullis, current
tuition $43,131/year), and enrolled briefly at American University before
dropping out. That’s a pretty familiar curriculum vitae, that of the socially
alienated youth with enough of an education and well-heeled background to enjoy
his social alienation, and to make something of it. But there was real
suffering, too: The long dark shadow over his life was a mugging outside of his
California home in 1991, during which his best friend, Black Flag roadie Joe
Cole, was shot to death.
“I survive America,” he says, “in spite of what it wants
to do to people like me.” One cannot help but note that “people like me” in
this case means beloved, widely admired, well-off celebrities. There’s a bit of
a blind spot there for him, as there often is for similar celebrities. He took
a moment to piss on Brett Kavanaugh and to heap praise on the performer he most
admires: Iggy Pop. You’ll be familiar with the thin allegations against Justice
Kavanaugh. Iggy Pop is indeed a gifted performer. He’s also a man who
maintained a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl and then recorded a
song, “Look Away,” mocking her family for their inability to do anything about
it. Another of those blind spots, I suppose.
It is difficult to get outside ourselves, and to
understand our own biases. Rollins, playing to the Dallas hipster crowd,
praised Senate candidate Robert Francis O’Rourke — he goes by “Beto” for
campaign purposes — who is running against Senator Ted Cruz. O’Rourke, like
Rollins, is a prep-school kid with good family connections. His father was a
politically important judge in Texas, which must have come in handy when he was
arrested for drunk driving after careering into a truck and attempting to flee
the scene. (O’Rourke still denies that he tried to run; witnesses told police
otherwise.) O’Rourke, too, is a familiar type: The rowing-crew captain
protected by daddy’s position from bearing the full consequences of his
misbehavior. You think the sons of tomato pickers named Roberto Gonzalez or
Perez or Guzman get sent into court–recommended
misdemeanor programs after driving drunk into oncoming traffic and trying to
flee the scene? Nope.
Ted Cruz, on the other hand, is a bookish nerd, the son of an immigrant from
Matanzas, Cuba, a guy who busted his ass at Princeton and who will talk your
ear off about Hayek and history and constitutional theory. And yet he’s somehow
the entitled jerk in the race? Another of those blind spots. O’Rourke may be a
bass-player, but he’s about as punk-rock as my Brooks Brothers pajamas. The
ties of tribe run deep, and they are not always obvious to us. I wonder what,
if anything, Henry Rollins actually knows about Ted Cruz, or “Beto” O’Rourke.
On the same theme: Does anybody really think that Taylor
Swift sat down and marked up a copy of Title IV, sec. 40001-40703 of Public Law
103–322, taking note of the ACLU’s historical objections to the law and the
findings in United States v. Morrison,
which ruled part of it unconstitutional? Do you think she carefully considered
the provisions of the law that Republicans objected to, such as the process for
extending temporary visas to illegal aliens who claimed to have been victimized
by certain crimes? Or do you think she saw the words “Violence Against Women
Act,” took a good hard look at Senator Blackburn, and let that be that?
It’s not that I don’t get it. I have spent a little bit
of time with Senator Cruz, whom I like and admire, and I often have the same
reaction to his campaign performances that I had to those of George W. Bush:
“Who is this Howdy-Doody m———-r on my television? Because he sure as hell bears
scant resemblance to the man I met.” I don’t know why Senator Cruz does that
Elmer Gantry thing on the campaign trail, and I am a native Texan. I suppose it
works. It must. Or, at least, it must have. As I wrote in the Wall Street
Journal earlier this year, things change, even in Texas, where the increasingly
urban population is going to make things complicated for Republicans such as
Senator Cruz.
Republicans are not cool. Never have been. The hipsters
in Brooklyn may be aping Abe Lincoln’s facial hair these days, but President
Lincoln was not cool in his time. Neither were Dwight Eisenhower and Senator
Taft. Hollywood thought that Ronald Reagan — one of their own — was the devil
incarnate. Rollins’s pals the Ramones satirized him in “Bonzo Goes to Bitburg,”
and Johnny Ramone was a Republican. Barry Goldwater? Those glasses are
fashionable now (cf. Rollins, Henry) but Senator Goldwater was not cool — not
in 1964, not thereafter. Cool is carefree. Cool doesn’t try too hard. Cool is
not overly concerned about being responsible. Cool is just cool.
I don’t need Republicans to be cool. I need them to try
to govern like adults.
(Alas.)
But the cult of cool is a faith without mercy — Ego, too,
is a jealous god. Celebrities such as Taylor Swift and Henry Rollins swim in
the sea of cool, which is invisible to them for the same reason that water is
invisible to a tuna. It isn’t that they are stupid (some celebrities are
genuinely stupid — looking at you, Sean Penn — but I do not think that there is
any reason to believe that Swift or Rollins is among them), and it isn’t that
they are incurious: Rollins is one of the most inquisitive people walking
upright, one who consumes books and documentaries and experiences with real
intellectual hunger. (You might call him “civilized.”) Like John
Watson, they see, but they do not observe. And one of the reasons they do not
observe is that they don’t have to.
There isn’t any price for being intellectually irresponsible. Taylor Swift can
make poorly informed and shallow political statements all day, and I can
explain here why they are poorly informed and shallow, and, after I do that,
she’ll still be Taylor Swift. Of course it is folly to think very much about
the political opinions of pop singers and movie stars — except for the fact
that they exert a good deal more influence over the political discourse than do
the arguments and meditations of more responsible parties. This morning, one of
the local right-wing talk-radio hosts was going on in something like rapture
about Kanye West’s recent appearance in a MAGA hat. We conservatives are pretty
cheap dates when it comes to celebrity.
A funny story from last night: Rollins has appeared as an
interviewer in a bunch of documentaries, including one about New Orleans
residents who lost their homes in Hurricane Katrina. There was a woman he was
scheduled to interview, and she clearly did not want to be interviewed. He told
her that he understood, that he just wanted to hear her story, and that he’d
try to get the whole thing done in ten minutes or less. I had the same
experience about 20 years ago with a famous punk singer who had spoken often
about how much he hated being interviewed, about how put-upon and probed the
process made him feel. Henry, his name was.
No comments:
Post a Comment