By David Marcus
Monday, August 13, 2018
I’ve spent most of my adult life producing theater in New
York City. In that time, on more occasions than I care to remember, only 20 people
showed up in the audience when I’d hoped for hundreds. I thought of that with a
smile yesterday watching the maybe two dozen sad white nationalists hold their
“rally” in Washington. I know how bad that feels, the Public Address system and
stage you paid for mocking you.
Jason Kessler and his gang more than deserved it, but you
can see why they assumed they were going to sell out. The going narrative in
our newspapers and cable news shows is that the Trump presidency has emboldened
white supremacists, that they are no longer ashamed. After all, the president
is winking at them. There were probably 20 journalists for every white
nationalist at yesterday’s event precisely because the news media was testing
its hypothesis.
Whether the news media devoted too much coverage to these
20 people begging for attention was a close call. Those against it can
rightfully say that Kessler did nothing to earn the megaphone outlets like NPR
gave him, that news outlets are intentionally overblowing the threat because they
want to hurt Trump, or even that gasoline was being poured on a cultural fire.
But on the other hand, a year ago a woman was killed by a
crazed white nationalist during this event. Even if only 20 showed up
yesterday, it only takes one with a car. Further, the counterprotest was a much
larger story this year. It could reasonably be described as a story worth
covering. Lastly, outlets like CNN that road-blocked their afternoon broadcast
to cover the score of bad people in a Washington park were testing an important
hypothesis.
Here’s the
Hypothesis
The going wisdom since Charlottesville is that Donald
Trump has been blowing a dog trumpet to all the racists in America. The
accusation is that he plays footsie with a dark, racist underbelly of our
country. It is not a hypothesis without support. His weird claim that he didn’t
know anything about David Duke in 2016, when Duke had been a primary reason he
didn’t run for president on the Reform ticket in 2000, was an early troubling
event.
His initial reaction to last year’s violence in
Charlottesville wasn’t much better. Even his tweet this past week about
disliking all racists seemed to avoid the central point. It is reasonable to
ask why a president who seems obsessed with black athletes protesting, and
calls them out constantly, can’t just one time tweet, “The white nationalists
coming to DC are losers. Sad.”
All of the evidence listed above leads to the idea that
white supremacists are ready for prime time. No longer a secluded group of
crazies, they have taken over the GOP and are ready to rumble, goes the
thinking. That is why so much money and manpower was spent covering the event.
After all, last year the siren song of Richard Spencer had drawn hundreds of
khaki-wearing, tiki-torch white warriors defying replacement. That very well
could have happened again.
But it didn’t. The thing about a hypothesis is that when
evidence pokes a hole in it, the hole has to be addressed and patched. A hole
in a hypothesis doesn’t mean the whole thing is wrong. In fact, most
discoveries require constant adjustment to the hypothesis. Yesterday’s sad display
from the alt-right doesn’t prove that the president isn’t influenced by people
who share some of their views (which he may amplify), but it does utterly
degrade the argument that he is normalizing or allowing for outward displays of
racism.
Cover Your Bet
CNN and most of the other news outlets made a bet on
yesterday’s story. They went all in. They sent the big guns because if
something had gone down, had the waking dragon of white supremacy lashed out,
they needed to be there. But a bet is a bet. As it turned out, the damning
display of a racist America they placed their chips on crapped out. So what is
their loss?
That’s the key question. What do these outlets lose by
being wrong about this? What they should lose is a bit of certainty about their
underlying assumptions. Everyone who covers politics and culture is wrong a
lot. That’s most of the job. The rest of the job is to say when you’re wrong
and work through why. Yesterday the big news media got it wrong.
On those nights when only 20 people showed up at our
show, I’d sit with my wife and coproducer and we’d say, “What did we do wrong?”
It is my sincere hope that Kessler and everyone who marched with him yesterday
ask themselves that question and turn towards a better path. But the news media
has questions to answer too, and they aren’t easy ones. The drastic decline in
attendance for Unite the Right this year is unambiguously good, but there is
still good reason to feel uneasy. How should this be covered? At the very
least, honestly.
No comments:
Post a Comment