By Roger Clegg
Tuesday, July 03, 2018
The Wall Street
Journal and New York Times are
both reporting that the Trump administration will be rescinding Obama-era
guidance on the use of race and ethnicity in student admissions (higher
education) and assignments (K–12).
This is good news. As I explained on National Review Online as the Obama statements were issued — here
and here
and here,
for example — they misread the law and were bad policy as well.
It’s not that complicated: As a policy matter, skin color
and national origin should not play a role in deciding where a student can go
to school. The costs of such discrimination overwhelm any claim of “educational
benefits” from having a politically correct racial and ethnic mix of students.
As a legal matter, while the courts have, alas, left the door ajar for this
sort of discrimination, they have also placed significant restraints on it. The
federal government should not be encouraging schools to do as much of this as
they can get away with, which is what the Obama administration’s guidance did.
Most of the arguments against politically correct racial
discrimination have been around for a long time, but I’ll mention briefly the
two that have recently, and rightly, attracted greater attention.
First, it is not just white students who are frequently
discriminated against, but Asian-American students as well. Indeed, as America
becomes increasingly multiracial and multiethnic — and as individual Americans
are themselves more and more likely to be multiracial and multiethnic — it
becomes more and more untenable for our institutions to sort people according
to what color skin they have and where their ancestors came from.
Second, the evidence is now overwhelming that, because of
the “mismatch” phenomenon, it is not only the students who are discriminated
against who are hurt by these policies, but also those who are supposedly
receiving racial preferences. That is, if a student is admitted to and attends
a school where his or her academic qualifications are significantly below the
rest of the student body’s, that student is less likely to graduate and more
likely to flunk out or switch majors, and will receive lower grades — all to
the student’s detriment.
I should also note a wonderful
essay published last week by John McWhorter on why this discrimination
should end.
So the Trump administration is wise to set a new course
and to jettison the Obama administration’s bad guidance in this area. Here’s
hoping that the administration issues new guidance and, in particular, supports
the lawsuit that Asian Americans have brought against Harvard and the
University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill for their admissions discrimination.
No doubt the Left will characterize this shift as somehow
racist, but in fact it is not only nondiscriminatory but also the only approach
that will not divide our multiethnic and multiracial society. It’s worthy of
the nation whose birthday we celebrate tomorrow. E pluribus unum.
No comments:
Post a Comment