By Jonah Goldberg
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Last night was the traditional National Review smoker on our splendid post-election cruise. This
is an ancient tradition, the origins of which stretch back into the mists
before time and the stories of a young solo sailor by the name of William F.
Buckley Jr. — sweat, sea water, and shark blood glistening off his chest — who
settled in to enjoy a relaxing cigar after killing the great white beast with
his bare hands.
I bring this up for two reasons. First, to alert the
reader that I am feeling a bit hungover from both smoke and spirit alike (so
please, stop reading so loudly!); second, because I think I must say goodbye to
another great white beast: Bill Clinton — and his remora bride, Hillary.
This is a good time to do it. The feeding frenzy
atmosphere around the Trump transition is bananas given that there’s so little
to say about it. My position on Trump remains unchanged from last week’s
G-File: Like Bill Clinton after taking a blood test, I am entirely in
wait-and-see mode.
Meanwhile, if I wait too long to give the Clintons a
send-off, it will seem not only gratuitous — which would be fine, that’s what
I’m going for — but also stale. The bad taste of the Clintons lingers on
enough, though — like the acidic after-burp from my lunch in Mexico yesterday —
that it still seems a bit relevant.
It Takes a Heart
of Stone Not To Laugh
I feel a little like a hungry Sid Blumenthal looking down
at a box full of live, white mice: Where to begin?
Well schadenfreude is always a good way to get your day
going. The stories about Hillary measuring the drapes are all over Washington.
They literally popped champagne on
the campaign plane on Election Day.
I like to imagine Bill Clinton going through binders full
of women — and not the Romney kind — picking out the “deputies” he’d like to
work with in the White House and Sid Blumenthal letting his fingers wander over
an assortment of fine Italian leather riding crops pondering his return to
power.
Someone recently told me that the Bill Clinton Presidential
Library is built off-center on its campus in anticipation of the day that
Hillary’s presidential library would go along side it. I can’t find any
corroboration of this, save for the fact that if you look at these pictures, it
certainly seems plausible.
The Clinton
Restoration That Wasn’t
It also seems plausible because the Clintons always
planned on Hillary becoming president. It was the logical corollary for the
“two for the price of one” nonsense Bill peddled from the beginning. The
Clintons burrowed into the brain stem of the Democratic party, like one of
those ear-tunneling scorpion things in Star
Trek II, and they never left. In the process, they hollowed out the party.
Barack Obama helped of course (see my recent column on that), but the Clintons
didn’t mind too much because they knew if the bench was cleared of competition,
Obama would have to hand the keys to Hillary.
It’s also plausible because there’s really no other
explanation for why Hillary would stay married to Bill — even on paper — not
only enduring the constant humiliation but actually working assiduously to
discredit the inconvenient members of Bill’s harem. Clinton defenders love to
righteously justify their partnership on the grounds that no one has a right to
judge someone else’s marriage. Logically, I’ve always thought “no right to
judge” arguments were a little ridiculous. But in the case of the Clintons,
they’re so absurd they fall into the category of gaslighting. The Clintons
always boasted about their marriage — that was the whole point of the
two-for-the-price-of-one argument. At the Democratic convention, Bill gave one
of the oddest testimonials to a wife by a husband ever given, making it sound
like he fell in love with her because she’d make a great chief of staff. “She’s
a changemaker! A changemaker!” he insisted, sounding like she knew how to give
four quarters for a dollar better than any teenager at a video arcade.
But if you dared enlist inconvenient facts in your own
judgment of their nuptial endeavors, you were violating some sacred rule. In
other words, their marriage was relevant but we were only allowed to subscribe
to their interpretation of it. Our lying eyes were illegitimate.
The Tornado
I know it seems impossible given the nigh-upon Swiss
precision and focus of this “news”letter, but I rarely do much prep for this
thing. I wake up, drink a dozen raw eggs, and start typing. But since I’m in
book-writing Hell and on the high seas, I figured that maybe I should get ahead
of the game.
So, a few days ago, I asked my research assistant, Jack
“Not the Belt! Please Not the Belt!” Butler, to pull together a Clinton
Greatest Hits file.
“What specifically are you looking for?” he asked, his
flinching fear dripping from the e-mail.
“Everything.”
“Everything?”
“E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G!” [In my best Gary Oldman from The Professional voice.]
Jack did a fine job, thus avoiding getting the hose
again. The ship’s antediluvian WiFi groaned downloading the document, like
Michael Moore at Walmart trying not to stand up in his scooter as he strains to
grab a family-sized tub of SpaghettiOs from a high shelf. The Travel Office,
the commodities futures, the Rose Law Firm billing records, the Lincoln
Bedroom, on and on it went. A great feeling of dread came over me.
You see, the retromingent trail of House Clinton
stretches so far back and coats so much of our lives, even pondering the
question gives me a queasy feeling, like contemplating using one of those black
lights to find the carpet and cushion stains on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane.
As I looked over the document, reading all those names
associated with all those scandals, legal, moral, and ethical — Webb Hubbel,
Charlie Trie, Lanny Davis, Sid Blumenthal, et al. — I tried to get myself
psyched up to wade back into it. I felt a bit like Bill Murray in Meatballs trying to get Fink excited
about the eating contest to come: “Look at all those steaming weenies.”
But the truth is that stuff is a bit sad and tedious.
Don’t get me wrong, as it says in the Torah, it is always good to mock Sid
Blumenthal. But so many of the people around the Clintons are also victims.
James McDougal, Bill’s former business partner, once said that the Clintons
“are really sort of like tornadoes moving through people’s lives. I’m just one
of the people left in the wake of their passing by.” McDougal died of a heart
attack in prison in 1998.
The Devil’s in the
Details
More to the point, my problems with the Clintons never
had that much to do with the scandals. Oh sure, I was infuriated when Hillary
brought her Medicis of the Ozarks tactics to Washington and had the staff of
the White House Travel Office carted off in handcuffs just so she could give
some Hollywood friends a business opportunity. And, sure, I was disgusted by
Bill’s Baron-and-the-Milkmaid games with a White House intern.
But it was the little things that made me detest them so.
Remember when Clinton went to Ron Brown’s funeral and was yucking it up with a
pal only to realize television cameras were rolling? He suddenly started to weep for his dear
friend. It was this kind of manipulation of the public — and the way the
press and his fans (but I repeat myself) fell for it, that so disgusted me. In
1999, when Hillary was preparing to run for the Senate as the heroic martyr of
her own marriage, The New York Times
Magazine was brought in to start the roll out. In order to convey that she
wasn’t just a policy polymath (who just happened to help deliver a Republican
Congress because of her disastrous health-care scheme) but also a super-mom,
they set up a display of Chelsea’s collection of Beanie Babies. Never mind that
Beanie Babies had only just come on the market and Chelsea was in her second
year of college at Stanford, Beanie Babies focus-grouped well.
Which, of course, brings me to the issue of their
cynicism. Of course, one could run through the greatest hits from their
catalog: the renting of the Lincoln Bedroom, the pardon-selling, and all that.
But again, it was the little things. When Bill was down in the polls, he wanted
to go on vacation in Martha’s Vineyard to do what he likes best (not counting
conducting impromptu Lyme disease tick-checks at Hooters): schmooze with
celebrities and play golf. But Dick Morris, his psephological haruspex, had
butchered a goat and found that the entrails foretold this would poll poorly.
So they all went camping in Yellowstone instead. If only Bill had poll tested
his affair with Monica before he pole tested her.
And don’t even get me started with the lying. Bill was
one of the most impressive liars in American history. Yes, yes, all politicians
lie. But Bill was a savant, a priapistic prodigy of prevarication in which he
portrayed himself as a paladin of principle (that was a plug for my spoken word
album, Alliteration is my Bag, Baby).
“I have vivid and painful memories of black churches being burned in my own
state when I was a child.” There were none. “Since I was a little boy, I’ve
heard about the Iowa caucuses. That’s why I would really like to do well in
them.” The Iowa caucuses started in 1972, when he was at Oxford. In Israel, he
said he had met with Palestinian children earlier that day who expressed their
love of Israel. He never met with them. He lied about big things too, of
course. But, again, it’s the little things.
Among Hillary’s greatest problems wasn’t that she was a
liar, but that she was so bad at it. When Bill lied, it was like watching a
jazz impresario scat. You could pull him off an intern, slap him in the face
with a half-frozen flounder, and he could, without missing a beat, plausibly
explain that he was just a gentleman trying to help push the young lady over a
fence.
But when Hillary lied, which was often, it was like
watching a member of the Politburo explain to a hungry mob of peasants that
food-production targets exceeded expectations. Hillary never seemed to fully
grasp that Bill’s lying skills did not become community property when they got
married along with his collection of back issues of Juggs and that shoe box full of used pregnancy tests. There was
music to Bill’s lying while Hillary deceived the way Helen Keller played the
piano.
Goodbye to All
That
And now they’re gone. Oh sure, they’ll pop up from time
to time, the way Bill’s cold sore would keep coming back. But they’re now part
of history, not the future. And the best thing about this is it means the
gaslighting is over. For virtually my entire adult life, the Clintons have
corrupted the apparatchiks of the Democratic party, in and out of the media, by
forcing them to go along with the charade. They did it in part because people
feared their vindictiveness, to be sure. But their vindictiveness was itself a
byproduct of their perceived power.
In 2008, people would ask me if we were finally done with
the Clintons and I would respond, “Haven’t you seen any horror movies?” Freddy
Krueger and Jason always came back. But now, I think they’re really gone.
And with them goes the infatuation — along with the fear.
People forget the cult of personality, the willful suspension of credulity,
that was integral to these gaslighting grifters. When Bill Clinton
congratulated Dan Rather and Connie Chung for their softball interview of the
first couple, Rather responded: “If we could be one-hundredth as great as you
and Hillary Rodham Clinton have been together in the White House, we’d take it
right now and walk away winners.”
Well, now they’re all just walking away.
No comments:
Post a Comment