By Donna Carol Voss
Friday, September 16, 2016
The Electoral College has been on life support since a
chad—specifically a “hanging” chad—tipped the White House to George W. Bush in
2000. The painful reality of how our Constitution works was never more
apparent. The Gore/Lieberman ticket won the popular vote 50,994,086 to
50,461,092 but lost the electoral vote 266 to 271.
There was a lot more to it, but the punchline is that the
U.S. Supreme Court ruled Bush the winner because he won the electoral vote.
It’s a tribute to the American national character that we weathered that
cataclysm without civil war, but it left a bad taste in the electorate’s mouth.
During the 2016 Republican primary, when it looked as if
Donald Trump would win the popular vote but still not reach the delegate
threshold for nomination, that bad taste turned sour. Riding high on populism
and “throw the bums out,” Trump complained that the election was rigged because
the people wanted him, and whomever the people wanted, they should get.
Fortunately for the country, Trump reached the delegate threshold, and we were
spared a debacle that would have made 2000’s cataclysm look like a lemonade
stand.
Cue the national election. No controversy, scandal, “info
dump,” lie, corruption, defection, or dirty trick has been left unturned. Why
would election night go smoothly? Frankly, the plane is going down no matter
who wins; it’s only a question of water or land and how many survivors there
will be. Chances aren’t looking good for the Electoral College.
“This is a democracy,” the people cry. “It should be one
person-one vote, and that stupid Electoral College needs to go!” Poor Electoral
College. So misunderstood. If the Electoral College has to go, it has to go,
but we should at least buy it dinner first. While we’re at it, we might as well
get to know it better.
Trust History: You
Don’t Want Mob Rule
The sad lot of the Electoral College is that what you see
isn’t what you get. Like the counter-intuitive fact that a tire blowout on the
right requires a steering wheel correction to the left, the EC works backwards.
What appears to deprive the populace of its power to decide a president is the
very mechanism that preserves its power. It works that way because this isn’t a democracy; not a pure one.
“Pure democracy” is just another phrase for “mob rule.”
Dictatorship of the majority means 51 percent of the citizenry rule the other
49 percent. That minority has no rights except those the condescending majority
grants. It works well for those in the 51 percent, not so much for those in the
49. Plato knew it, and James Madison, who knew his Plato, did too. Plato and Madison
both recognized that justice and liberty for the minority is possible only when
power is shared between groups in society.
Plato’s “Republic” heavily influenced Madison and the
other framers to devise a Constitution that protected the minority. Plato held
that the ideal, i.e., just, form of government was one in which power was
shared correctly between workers, warriors, and rulers. Madison held that the
ideal, i.e., American, form of government was one in which power was shared
correctly between judges, lawmakers, and rulers.
Inspired as it is, our Constitution protects the minority
while preserving the best of democracy: we the people elect representatives to
run the government (republic) and we do so by majority vote (democracy). Ergo,
this is a democratic republic. Ergo, an Electoral College.
The Electoral
College Balances Voting Power
The purpose of the Electoral College is to balance voting
power across states so no one region of the country can gain too much control.
If a president is elected by a simple majority of votes, a candidate who is
wildly popular in one region (e.g., Ted Cruz in Texas, Mitt Romney in Utah) can
ignore smaller regions and campaign only where large majorities are possible.
Or a candidate who kills in California and New York can write off “flyover
country” completely.
If, however, the Electoral College elects a president, a
candidate who is wildly popular in one region must also prevail in a number of
sub-elections to win. The Electoral College ensures a better result for the
country as a whole than the democratic power play wherein 51 percent of us
matter and 49 percent of us don’t.
Think of the Electoral College like the World Series. One
person-one vote equates to the World Series Champions being determined by total
number of runs scored. If the Dodgers win the first game 10-0, and the Yankees
win the next four games 1-0, the Dodgers win the series. Even though the
Yankees bested the Dodgers in four games, it doesn’t matter because the Dodgers
scored 10 runs to their 4. One anomalous game decides the whole series. Without
the Electoral College, a few heavily populated states decide the whole election.
So, the poor Electoral College sits condemned before its
last meal because its power is misunderstood. How ironic—and tragic if no
stay-of-execution arrives—that those who clamor for “one person-one vote” are
seeking more power at the expense of power they already have.
No comments:
Post a Comment