National Review Online
Sunday, November 27, 2016
The headline over the Associated Press story read,
“Cuba’s Fidel Castro, Who Defied U.S. for 50 Years, Dies at 90.” Actually, he
defied it for closer to 60 years, in that his regime is still going. In any
case, the headline expressed a view of Castro that many people have, all over the
world: Castro as defier of the yanqui
colossus and its imperialism. But that is a U.S.-centric view. Oddly, Cubans
tend to view Castro as their dictator.
Or former dictator, or, now, late dictator. Their current
dictator is the younger Castro brother, Raúl.
The Castros and their compadres fought their revolution
in the 1950s and triumphed on New Year’s Day 1959. Many good and democratic
Cubans hailed them at the Hotel Nacional in Havana. They were hoping for a
better, and more democratic, day. And they had been promised one.
Yet the Castros, Che Guevara, and that gang quickly
turned the island into something all too familiar in the world: a one-party
dictatorship with a gulag. People streamed out of the country, if they were
able. One of them was Juanita Castro, who had fought alongside her brothers.
Explaining her defection, she said, “I could not remain
indifferent to what is happening in my country. My brothers Fidel and Raúl have
made it an enormous prison surrounded by water.”
Cuba was quickly impoverished, of course. There is an old
joke about socialism: If the Eskimos adopted it, they would soon have to import
ice. Well, Cuba, for a while, had to import sugar.
In an interesting touch, Fidel Castro banned Christmas,
from 1969 to 1998. Absolute dictators can do that. Cuba was, among other
things, Fidel’s personal fiefdom. And it was a “republic of fear,” to borrow a
phrase from Kanan Makiya, who used it to describe Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Many
Cubans were too afraid to utter Castro’s name. They gestured toward their chin,
indicating a beard.
He and his gang killed tens of thousands, surely. The
exact number is hard to pin down. Maria Werlau and her colleagues, at their Cuba Archive, have done noble and
conscientious work. Over the years of the Castro regime, 1 million Cubans have
gone into exile. Some Cubans have been shot in the water, in their attempts to
flee.
On one day — July 13, 1994 — there was an infamous
massacre, the Tugboat Massacre: Castro’s forces killed 37 would-be escapees,
most of them children and their mothers.
What kind of regime does this? What kind of regime would
rather kill people, in cold blood, than see them leave? Than see them have a
free life? The Castro regime, and it has been very popular, though not in Cuba.
Fidel Castro was the most popular dictator in the free
and democratic world. Stalin lost his luster after the Secret Speech in 1956.
Mao lost his luster, or some of it, in the wake of honest accounts of his rule
(by his doctor, Li Zhisui, for example). Ho rode high for a while, but not
after the reeducation camps and boat people.
But Castro? In 2002, Carole King, the American
singer-songwriter, crooned to him her hit song “You’ve Got a Friend.” He
certainly did, a great many of them.
Why did they love him? Why do they still? For one thing,
they see him as that defier of the yanqui
colossus. But also, they have bought, and propagated, three myths: that the
dictatorship has been good for literacy, good for health care, and good for
black people (“Afro-Cubans”). All of this is untrue. All of it has been
thoroughly debunked.
But, as Armando Valladares says, “What if it were true? Don’t people have literacy
and so on in countries that are not
cruel dictatorships?”
Valladares was a prisoner in the Castros’ gulag for 22
years. In 1986, he wrote the memoir Against
All Hope, earning him a designation: “the Cuban Solzhenitsyn.” That book
and others punctured the lies of the Cuban regime. One of the others was Before Night Falls (1993), the memoir by
Reinaldo Arenas. It was made into a movie, and an opera, too. Then in 2012
there was the amazingly honest movie Una
noche (One Night).
Mainly, however, the Castros’ fog machine prevailed. And
opinion leaders in free countries remained indifferent to Cuban suffering, when
not outright supportive of the dictatorship. Jeane Kirkpatrick once called this
“a puzzling and profoundly painful phenomenon of our times.”
Men who rose to the very top of their democratic
countries admired and loved Fidel Castro. Pierre Trudeau was one of them. He
asked Castro to be an honorary pallbearer at his funeral. He made the same
request of Jimmy Carter. Carter and Castro met at that funeral, which took
place in 2000, and this began a relationship between them. When Castro died,
Carter said, “Rosalynn and I share our sympathies with the Castro family and
the Cuban people on the death of Fidel Castro. We remember fondly our visits
with him in Cuba and his love of his country.”
Bear in mind that Castro’s “love of his country” drove a
million of his fellow Cubans out of it.
Trudeau’s son, the current prime minister of Canada,
Justin, was even more effusive than Carter. He said,
It is with deep sorrow that I
learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President.
Fidel Castro was a larger than life
leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary
revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the
education and healthcare of his island nation.
While a controversial figure, both
Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and
love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el
Comandante”.
This assessment is nothing less than repulsive. Prime
Minister Trudeau has apparently never met a detractor of Castro’s, for they do
not recognize the late dictator’s tremendous dedication, love, etc.
Admirers of Fidel Castro around the world have one thing
in common: They never had to live under his dictatorship. That is true of the
famous (Gabriel García Márquez) and the unknown (any number of professors on
American campuses).
The Castro regime and its supporters have a name for
Cuban democrats and dissidents: “gusanos,” meaning worms. These Cubans are the
best and the bravest, of course. Let’s name three of the dead: Oswaldo Payá,
Laura Pollán, Orlando Zapata. And three of the living: Oscar Biscet, Juan
Carlos González Leiva, Berta Soler.
For 40 years, the Castro regime was sustained by the
Soviet Union. Then, when this superpower collapsed, Western European
governments and others filled the gap. Then came Hugo Chávez’s Venezuela,
funneling oil wealth to Havana. Then, when chavista
Venezuela collapsed, President Obama threw a lifeline to the Castros, in the
form of unilateral recognition.
The Castro dictatorship is not only one of the oldest
dictatorships in the world, it is probably the luckiest.
The elder Castro dictator has died in bed at a very ripe
old age: 90. This is a fate that he denied to many, many people, who were his
victims. He was a boot stamping on the human face. There are others to do the
stamping.
A headline in the (London) Telegraph read, “The Death of Fidel Castro, Socialist Leader of the
Third World, Also Marks the End of 20th Century Communism.” Unfortunately, Raúl
is still going strong in Havana. His forces violently arrested a slew of
human-rights advocates the other day. As they were carted off, they tried to
form the letter “L” with their fingers: “L” for Libertad, Liberty.
No comments:
Post a Comment