By Stephen Roberts
Monday, May 30, 2016
There is a reason Donald Trump’s constant refrain “We
don’t win anymore” resonates with a sizable minority of voters. People yearn to
be empowered, and the American people in particular yearn to see America empowered.
In every contest of power and test of mettle in the past eight years, America
has prevaricated.
Long gone are the days of President George W. Bush
standing upon the rubble at Ground Zero and declaring our intent to fight.
Americans are demoralized. They want a leader who will look challenges and
crises in the eye, rather than bowing before them. But where does such strength
come from? What is it that makes America strong?
The Relationship
Between Might and Right
There are two prevalent types of strength in the realm of
politics. One contends that might makes right and the other contends that right
makes might. The first is the type that one would find in Vladimir Putin’s
Russia and Xi Jinping’s China. Both nations suppress dissent through brute strength
and nibble away at their neighbors’ territory with tanks and warships.
Like all repressive, collectivist regimes—be they fascist
or truly socialist—they buy into the utilitarian philosophy of social
Darwinism. Only the fittest survive. Power must be achieved at any cost,
maintained at any cost, and expanded at any cost. Those who get in the way of
that claim to power or try to thwart its expansion are crushed. The less “fit”
mysteriously fall from tall buildings or are poisoned (Russia) or simply flattened
by a tank (China).
America has historically bought into the second concept
of strength—that right makes might. Contrary to the claims of Marxist
historians, the American Revolution was not the product of rich and
exploitative merchants. Such a tawdry basis for revolt would never have
sustained our founding generation against the most advanced military in the
world. Instead, our country committed itself to a declaration of values
codified in the Declaration of Independence and written upon the inner
constitution of the individual heart. It is the power of ideas that drives both
the tank and the person who stands before it, hand upraised.
This moral certitude enabled the “Greatest Generation” to
prevail in World War II. The lack of that moral certitude undermined our war in
Vietnam, it anchored our resolve in the first Gulf War, and undermined it in
the second Gulf War. Our strength has always been tied to our moral character
and nothing does more to destroy our resolve than immoral conduct and moral
equivocations from our leadership.
Where Cold
Pragmatism Fails
How does this inform our conduct today? The social
Darwinist will deny the unborn to right to live and grant to the terminally ill
the power to kill themselves because the value of their life has been measured
and found wanting. The social Darwinist who opposes these values will do so
because he or she has known winners who could’ve been aborted but were not.
Those who rely on the inner constitution, on the other hand, will recognize
that life is not measured by social value or function, but has intrinsic worth.
Might does not make right; right makes might.
The social Darwinist will use the levers of political and
economic power to provide pleasure to the greatest number of people—usually the
most fit among us. The fundamental question for each policy will be “What
works?” Good deals will constantly be sought, but the quality of those
agreements will be determined by who comes out ahead—not by moral qualities of
goodness. Those who rely on the inner constitution, however, will be more
interested in pursuing the greatest amount of liberty to free Americans to
pursue moral good without coercion, for only a free people can be a moral
people.
The strength of America is rooted in her written
Constitution, as well as the unwritten one carried within the hearts of her
people. The written version will only remain as long as the unwritten one is
sustained. This inner constitution, as in the days of our Founding, requires
freedom for its virtuous expression. It cannot be written over like a defective
computer code by executive orders threatening a high price.
Many nations around the world have constitutions that
closely mirror that of America’s Constitution. Yet few of them have fostered
the inner constitution that sustains such a powerful document and have resorted
to the same social Darwinist terrors of countries without such constitutions.
Without a strong inner constitution, America’s written Constitution will be
meaningless, and America’s strength will slowly be sapped by the lack of her
moral resolve until she is just another second-rate dictatorial power.
As voters continue to flood the polls in record numbers
this election season, they should ask: What makes America strong, and which
view of strength is driving them to the polls?
No comments:
Post a Comment