By David French
Thursday, February 04, 2016
Here is the first reality of American identity politics:
White progressives run the entire enterprise. Here is the second reality: That
means sexual liberty trumps all, including racial equality. How else to explain
the mainstream media’s gigantic yawn at the first Latino man in American
history to win a major-party presidential caucus? Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio
combined for 51 percent of the vote from a lily-white, conservative Iowa
electorate, and no one seemed to mention race at all.
Are we suddenly bored by “firsts” now? Or is there
something wrong with Cruz and Rubio — something that has nothing to do with
their heritage and everything to do with their politics? Writing in the New York Times, University of Southern
California professor Robert Suro explored why the media response to this
“first” was so muted. The piece is short because, as Suro notes, the answer is
“not that complicated.”
Cruz and Rubio simply don’t meet “conventional
expectations of how Latino politicians are supposed to behave.” They’re not
progressive, and so they fail the media’s ideological litmus test:
No less an arbiter than Jorge Ramos, the Univision anchor, seemed to
condemn them without naming names in a column last month. “There is no greater
disloyalty than the children of immigrants forgetting their own roots. That is
a betrayal,” he wrote. It is criticism that echoes the rhetoric aimed at
Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court and other successful members of
minority groups who are perceived as failing to uphold their own group’s
interests.
The stupidity and mendacity are painful. The notion that
Ramos — an ideologue’s ideologue — maintains the journalistic objectivity
necessary to be an “arbiter” of anything other than his own progressive echo
chamber is laughable. As for Rubio and Cruz “forgetting their own roots,” this
is demonstrably false: Both have paid tribute to their immigrant families over
and over again, discussing in moving terms how their parents’ sacrifices shaped
their lives and worldviews. Neither has forgotten anything.
But the last phrase is the worst: “failing to uphold
their own group’s interests.” Cruz and Rubio are running to be president of the
United States, not “Latino-in-chief.” God forbid they seek to advance policies
that they believe are best for all Americans without prioritizing the narrow issues
that are purportedly “central to most organized Latino political interests.”
Let’s be clear, however, that even if both men remembered
their roots and supported a path to
legal status for illegal immigrants — as Rubio has and Cruz may have — they still
wouldn’t be celebrated for breaking historical barriers: “Organized Latino
interests” would, no matter what, oppose them bitterly and accuse them of
selling out their race.
Why? Because white progressives have engineered a
cultural system where black and Latino politicians deserve respect only if they
get with the progressive program — the entire progressive program.
Just ask formerly pro-life Jesse Jackson. Not even
marching with Martin Luther King Jr. could protect him from the intolerant
demands of progressive sexual revolutionaries. He had to switch sides.
Just ask any black leader who opposes gay rights, only to
be be told that “you can’t be pro-black and homophobic at the same time.” The
appropriation of the language of civil rights on behalf of a population that
was never enslaved, never denied the right to vote, and never subject to Jim
Crow is offensive. Yet even the most “powerful” black and Latino civil-rights
organizations salute and obey. Everything is Selma now.
Identity politics isn’t identity politics. It’s
progressivism masking its will to power behind racial self-righteousness. What
does racial-identity politics have to do with an abortion-on-demand regime that
disproportionately murders black babies in the womb? Shut up, and get in line.
What does racial-identity politics have to do with a gay-rights movement that
is systematically attacking religious liberty, including the liberty of the
very churches that have long served as the spiritual and cultural backbone of
black and Latino cultures? Shut up, and get in line.
Cruz and Rubio have proved they’re their own men by
refusing to comply with the demands of white progressives and their Latino
activist enablers. The elite scorn they’ve earned themselves in the process
seems a small price to pay for moral and intellectual independence. You can’t
beat identity politics by joining it. For conservatives and, ultimately, for
the nation, the only winning move is not to play.
No comments:
Post a Comment