By Rich Lowry
Wednesday, July 23, 2014
Sound bites are usually meant to obfuscate as much as
clarify. Rarely is one so incisive as the line uttered by Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu the other day about the difference between Israel and Hamas:
“We’re using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they’re using their
civilians to protect their missiles.”
This is the ground truth of the latest Gaza war that gets
obscured by the relentlessly repeated stark disparity in casualties between the
Gazans, hundreds of whom have died in the conflict, and the Israelis.
Each civilian death in Gaza is a tragedy, but who is
ultimately responsible? The moral calculus here is simple. Hamas precipitated
the war and persisted in waging it even when Israel was willing to accept an
Egyptian offer of a cease-fire. Hamas hides its rockets in schools and places
its command bunkers under hospitals. It wants war, and it wants civilian
casualties.
Stalin infamously said that one death is a tragedy, a
million is a statistic. Hamas is happy with either a tragedy (the four kids
killed on the beach by Israeli shells last week) or a statistic (the climbing
civilian toll), so long as it is death and so long as it can be used in the
propaganda war against Israel.
This isn’t hard to understand. Yet even supporters of
Israel give in to the twisted logic that the Gaza conflict is somehow an
indictment of the Jewish state. Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
said on CNN “that this is hurting Israel’s moral authority.” Which is exactly
the conclusion Hamas wants “the international community” to draw from its
depraved indifference to the safety of Gazans.
Jon Stewart did a controversial bit last week about how
Israel has all the advantages in the conflict, what with its warnings via app
to its civilians about incoming rockets and its ability to neutralize those
rockets with its missile defenses.
Yes, how unfair. Israel invested in systems entirely
devoted to protecting its civilian population from unprovoked attack. What
dastardliness is the Zionist Entity capable of next?
Dean Obeidallah of The Daily Beast lauds Stewart for this
in a piece headlined, “How Jon Stewart Made It Okay to Care About Palestinian
Suffering.” It’s more like making it cool to be obtuse about the Gaza war.
Of course there is an asymmetry between Hamas and Israel.
There will always be a technological gap between a ramshackle terror force with
medieval religious views and a dynamic, liberal society. On Sept. 11, 2001, Al
Qaeda had box cutters. We had B-52s. Did that make us the unsympathetic Goliath
to Al Qaeda’s David?
Israel might well undertake an indiscriminate, scorched
earth campaign in Gaza — if it were run by, say, the Assad regime in Syria,
with its taste for chemical weapons and barrel bombs. Jeffrey Goldberg pointed
out in The Atlantic that 700 people were killed in Syria last weekend alone,
outpacing the total death toll in Gaza so far, but the deaths received almost
no media coverage.
Whatever its failings, the American news media are
paragons of balance and context compared to their international counterparts.
The BBC has been accused of pro-Israeli bias, which is only marginally more
absurd than accusing Al-Jazeera of a similar slant.
Here at home, Italian-Palestinian Rula Jebreal complained
on MSNBC that the media, including MSNBC itself, are “disgustingly biased” in
favor of Israel. After the ensuing mini-firestorm, Chris Hayes had her on his
show and explained the difficulty in giving representatives of Israel and Hamas
equal time. It turns out that it’s hard to book representatives from the terror
group.
For that matter, no one has managed to wrangle many
on-air appearances by mouthpieces for ISIL, either. If only the coverage of the
Iraq war were more fair and balanced.
None of this is to deny the very real suffering of
Gazans. No rational person interested in their welfare would govern the way
Hamas does. Who except a band of fanatics would conclude that what desperately
poor Gaza needs is a constant state of war with a much more powerful
neighboring state?
Hamas is a miserable excuse for a government. Its
technical proficiency is smuggling. Its infrastructure program consists of
building tunnels for acts of murder and kidnapping. Its civil defense system is
to admonish endangered civilians not to heed Israeli warnings to flee buildings
about to be hit. Its peace plan is annihilation of the Jewish state.
It can’t achieve that by force of arms. Its objective is,
with support from fellow travelers and useful idiots the world over, to make
Israel the new South Africa, to isolate it and morally delegitimize it toward
its ultimate destruction. If it takes countless dead Palestinians to do it, so
be it.
No comments:
Post a Comment