By Dennis Prager
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
In August 2002, a homo sapien known as Ariel Castro
abducted 21-year-old Michelle Knight, the mother of a two-year-old boy. In
April 2003, he abducted Amanda Berry, a day before her 17th birthday. And in
April 2004, he abducted 14-year-old Gina DeJesus.
For the next ten years, these girls were regularly raped,
kept in chains, beaten, humiliated and almost never allowed to see the light of
day. When Michelle Knight became pregnant, Castro starved her for two weeks and
kicked and punched her in the stomach to induce an abortion. He repeated this
method of pregnancy termination on Knight four additional times.
It is important to try to understand the magnitude of the
sadism and other forms of cruelty and suffering inflicted by this creature.
First, there is the horror and suffering of being
kidnapped; of being taken away from everyone you love. Even if no torture,
rape, solitary confinement, etc., were involved, that would be enough to weep
for these girls. And in Michelle's case, she was taken from her baby boy, whom
she never got to see grow up, and had every reason to fear she would never see
again.
Second, there is the nightmare inflicted on the families.
One day, their daughter, sister, and in one case, mother, disappears --
seemingly forever. Was she murdered? Had she suffered? Is she suffering now?
Day after day, year after year, those questions haunted the families.
Third, now add the torture, beatings, grotesque
humiliations, rapes, permanent state of terror and confinement much of the time
to a basement -- for 10 years.
Mercifully for us, we humans cannot completely assimilate
the totality of the suffering of victims such as these three girls.
But we can at least intellectually perceive the monstrous
behavior that went on in that Cleveland house.
Now, what about Castro?
What is he?
The answer is that he is a monster.
I use this word deliberately. Years ago, I interviewed a
Holocaust survivor named Leon Radzik, whom I had known for decades. He told me,
among many other such stories, of a young Jewish boy in the concentration camp
who, because of the terrible hunger he was suffering, had licked a candy
wrapper discarded by a Nazi guard. A guard noticed this, and taking offense at
a Jew licking a candy wrapper that had been used by a German, took a shovel and
slowly pushed the sharp edge into the boy's neck until it severed his throat.
I asked my older friend how he explained such people. He
had an immediate answer: "They were monsters that looked like
humans."
Ever since then, I have found that to be the most
accurate way of describing the Nazi guards and the Ariel Castros of the world
-- monsters that look human.
Not everyone agrees.
Castro doesn't agree. Nor do his lawyers.
In his long rambling statement after being found guilty,
Castro denied a half-dozen times that he was a monster. He was
"sick," he said. He himself was a victim -- of an addiction to sex
and pornography.
Though loathsome, Castro's statement is not only an
indictment of himself, but of the amoral vocabulary of our time.
The elites have taught for generations that most violent
criminals are victims and therefore not fully responsible for what they do.
Poor and non-white violent criminals, we have been
assured, are victims of poverty or racism. Likewise, all alcoholics are
victims. That's why Castro repeatedly compared himself to alcoholics. In
addition to its moral confusion, this violent criminal-as-victim rhetoric has
increased evil: Nothing produces evil -- both on a national and individual
level -- as much as perceiving oneself or one's group as a victim.
We have substituted therapeutic language for moral
language. That's why we have substituted "sick" for "evil."
And in that way, too, we have transformed monsters into victims.
Listen to Castro:
"What I'm trying to get at is these people are
trying to paint me as a monster, and I'm not a monster. I'm sick."
"I am not a violent predator that you are trying to
make me look like a monster. I'm not a monster. I am a normal person. I am just
sick. I have an addiction -- just like an alcoholic has an addiction.
Alcoholics cannot control their addiction. That's why I can't control my
addiction, your honor."
Unfortunately, Ariel Castro is not the only moral fool
here. So are his defense attorneys, one of whom, Craig Weintraub, told the
press after a three-hour meeting with Castro: "The initial portrayal by
the media has been one of a 'monster' and that's not the impression that I got
when I talked to him for three hours."
How can someone speak to Castro for three hours and
announce that he didn't "get the impression" that Castro was a
monster?
The answer is that this, too, is a symptom of the moral
confusion in our society. People increasingly assess individuals by the
"impression they get" of the individual rather than by the
individual's actions.
So, let's be clear about this. As a general principle of
life, we are what we do. If we do overwhelmingly good things, we are good; and
if we do monstrous things, we are monsters. Perhaps most people are in the
middle, and cannot -- and should not -- be easily judged. But if Ariel Castro
isn't a monster, then no one is a monster, and no one is good.
No comments:
Post a Comment