By Michael Schaus
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
It is now official. For all their talk about education’s
failings, and all their feigned interest in bettering the educational system,
liberals once again have proven that they hate giving the disadvantaged the
same opportunities as the privileged. According to Fox News, the Justice
Department is trying to stop a school vouchers program in Louisiana that
attempts to place children in independent schools instead of under-performing
public schools. So, apparently it’s all about “the kids”. . . Unless Teacher’s
Unions are set to lose a dollar.
Louisiana is one of a few states that have implemented a
very limited voucher program. Vouchers, on their own merit, should be a
championed idea for underprivileged minorities and low income families. With educational
dollars meant to better the learning process for students throughout the state,
vouchers were given to 570 public school students so that children in
impoverished and underperforming schools might reap the same benefited
education as some of the most privileged in the state. However, in papers filed
in US District Court, the Justice Department said that the vouchers “impeded
the desegregation process."
Right. Imagine the horror on Martin Luther King Jr.’s
face when he learned that low-income students were given the opportunity to
attend some of the most exclusive and impressive academies in the state. The
federal government is arguing that allowing students to attend independent
schools under the voucher system “could create a racial imbalance in public
school systems protected by desegregation orders.”
Anyone else find it ironic that the first black
President’s administration is blocking a reform effort that is poised to
dis-proportionately benefit minority communities?
According to Fox News: The Louisiana Governor, Bobby
Jindal -- who last year expanded the program that started in 2008 -- said this
weekend that the department's action is "shameful" and said President
Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder "are trying to keep kids trapped in
failing public schools against the wishes of their parents."
Tough words. . . And accurate.
The Louisiana Supreme Court already found, earlier this
year, that the state could not use the allotted voucher money. As a result the
Republican governor had to find the $40 million in other public funds to move
the project forward and help the 8,000 students already enrolled in the
program.
The objection by the DOJ is just one more case where
Democrats and Liberal groups have tried to limit the ability of minorities to
move out of failing schools. A hypocritical maneuver for a group that claims
the mantel of moral superiority on the issue.
The reason is far more simple, and insidious, than most
would think. The Liberal/ Democratic agenda is closely aligned with Teacher’s
unions. And like all unions, they are working to protect due paying positions
above all else. And yes: That means the Unions would rather preserve their jobs
than work for the betterment of your child’s educational experience. After all,
over 95 percent of political donations from Teacher’s Unions went to Democrats;
and based off of Democrat run cities like Chicago, New York, LA, and Detroit,
that’s a horrible investment. On a purely economic analysis, it would seem the
Democrat Party is far more dedicated to keeping the Union happy, than honestly
improving student education. As a consequence, the lobbying arm of the union is
not focused on the interests of students. . . But don’t take my word for it:
Apparently losing a teacher’s tenure is “too high a price
to pay” for a more effective educational system for our youth. And to think
they act like it’s “all for the children.”
The most terrifying part of the story: The case is
scheduled to be heard by a judge who has already ruled that parts of Jindal's
2012 expansion were unconstitutional. So, we have a Judge who is opposed to
using public education monies for the purpose of educating the public (as opposed
to feeding Teacher’s Unions), about to rule on a law that runs contrary to the
fundamental concerns of the Obama Administration. If the Judge, or the DOJ,
were actually interested in improving education, they would applaud any attempt
to move students from failing schools. They, instead, seem far more interested
in preserving the failing status quo.
After all, our ruling elite don’t send their kids to
underperforming schools. So, really, why should they promote opportunities for
the rest of America’s youth without first bowing to politically connected
Unions?
No comments:
Post a Comment