By David Limbaugh
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
In President Obama's world, "fairness" seems to
be of overarching concern. Too bad "fairness" means what he says it
does rather than what Webster's specifies.
You'll rarely hear Obama talk about economic growth --
even as an aspiration -- and not just because there's been a dearth of it under
his miserable five years in office.
It's not where his head is. It's not his wheelhouse. It's
absent from his list of priorities, and I'm not just talking about golf, White
House galas and filling out NCAA tournament brackets.
When he talks policy, he doesn't talk about economic
growth, except when he's touring the country to give the latest version of his
"laserlike focus" speech. Even then, any references to economic
growth are either propaganda throwaways or rationalizations for why things
aren't better.
True economic growth -- really expanding the economic
pie, getting America's business and industrial sectors humming again and
experiencing an uplifting economic boom -- does not even occur to him. They
just didn't emphasize bullishness on free market capitalism and the
entrepreneurial spirit in his community organizing seminars and his
hate-America-as-founded rallies.
Laserlike focus? He has one, all right, but it's on
moving us further away from anything that could spur real economic growth and a
proliferation of prosperity across all income levels.
He is about consolidation and top-down control. To him,
those in power should concern themselves not with growth but with how resources
are allocated.
Obama opposes lower capital gains tax rates, despite
their history of spurring economic growth and more tax revenues than higher
rates. He simply can't abide the wealthy's thriving under this scheme. To him,
fairness means punishing high-income earners, even when doing so requires
hurting lower-income earners.
He opposes robust exploitation of our conventional energy
resources -- oil, coal, natural gas -- and nukes because these industries
symbolize parts of America that he resents.
He would have us believe that he obstructs the domestic
production of oil and the Keystone XL pipeline -- despite the jobs and economic
growth they promise -- because of his commitment to the environment. But
according to his own false environmental theology, environmental assaults are a
global phenomenon, yet he encourages oil production from other countries, such
as Brazil. He obviously has little concern that blocking the Keystone XL
pipeline will lead to alternative transportation routes that will cause worse
environmental damage. More outrageously, he and his environmental zealots have
never explained why they favor such punitive measures on the American economy
when the most credible studies inform us that such measures will not
appreciably reduce long-term global temperature -- even if that were a
legitimate concern.
Have you read much from Obama's fawning liberal media
about the incredible economic potential that fracking offers? More likely,
you've seen the trumped-up environmental horrors attending this process. Here
again, Obama and his ilk prefer to err on the side of damaging economic growth,
because their perverse notion of fairness doesn't incorporate economic growth
across the board. It only sees austerity and government-forced redistribution
of finite economic resources.
Obama treated us to a bird's-eye view of his idea of
"fairness" during the GM and Chrysler bailouts, when he unilaterally
and lawlessly divested secured creditors of their rightful place in line to be
paid, in favor of his unsecured union buddies, whom he bumped to the front of
the line for preferential payment. Fairness? Maybe not according to Webster's
-- and certainly not according to the U.S. Constitution -- but definitely in
the view of his fellow travelers sweet on Marxist get-even-ism.
But the most egregious recent illustration of Obama's
warped concept of "fairness" is the scandalous series of episodes
involving the implementation of his signature piece of legislation --
Obamacare.
I guess you didn't realize that "fairness" in
health care means not the access to care at affordable prices for the most
people but compelling people, through punitive measures, to procure health
insurance whether they want it or not, regardless of whether it will destroy
their existing insurance plan, their relationship with their doctor and their
access to quality of care and cause the overall degradation of the American
health care system. Even then, this Obama-enforced "fairness" will
leave millions uninsured.
When Obama was stumping for health care
"fairness," did you know that he would give certain states special
deals to buy their votes? That he would be overseeing the allocation of
thousands of waivers to defer the pain of his supporters and purchase their
silence?
That he and his white-collar bureaucratic thugs would
delay imposition of the mandate for employers but not employees? That they are
about to exempt members of Congress from the requirement that they participate
with everyone else in the glorious Obamacare exchanges?
If Obama and his abusive ruling class keep it up (in the
name of fairness), we'll be talking in terms of not the American Revolution but
the French Revolution, and I think we all understand how that ended.
No comments:
Post a Comment