By Debra J. Saunders
Sunday, August 04, 2013
Before you join Jay Leno and Susan Sarandon and sign an
open letter to Gov. Jerry Brown to protest "solitary confinement" in
California prisons' security housing units, there are a few things you should
know. Start with the criminal records of the leaders of the Short Corridor
Collective -- the four inmates who, despite their "extreme
isolation," orchestrated a hunger strike with more than 30,000 inmate
participants July 8.
While serving time for burglary in Folsom State Prison,
hunger strike leader Todd Ashker stabbed a fellow inmate to death in 1987.
During his murder trial, a fellow inmate and fellow
member of the Aryan Brotherhood stabbed Ashker's lawyer four times with a
shank. Attorney Philip Cozens told the Los Angeles Times he believes that the
inmate stabbed him in order to provoke a mistrial.
Yes, Ashker is the man the hunger strikers want to return
to the general prison population. "What happens to him if he kills someone
else," Criminal Justice Legal Foundation President Michael Rushford asked,
"he gets another life term?"
Does it matter to you that Ashker killed someone in
prison? I asked Isaac Ontiveros of Critical Resistance, which has supported the
hunger strike. "Nobody can be tortured" for committing a crime, he
answered.
I agree, but the Pelican Bay SHU isn't torture. I went
there in 1993. I wouldn't want to spend an hour alone in one of those
8-by-10-foot cells, but I'd hate to spend any time in any prison. That's the
idea.
There's no natural light and there's only recycled air in
the SHU, but the worst part about the cells is that they have no real furniture
-- just ugly concrete forms that serve as beds or chairs.
"We don't call it solitary confinement,"
California Department of Corrections spokeswoman Terry Thornton noted. Inmates
have cable TVs, access to books and limited time in the law library. They can
talk to, if not see, other inmates in their eight-cell pods.
Many of the cells house two inmates. Doesn't matter to
the "torture" mongers. A 2012 inmate lawsuit argues that "being
locked up with a cellmate all day in an 80-square-foot cell does not compensate
for the severe isolation of the Pelican Bay SHU."
It's important to understand why prison officials want to
isolate about 3 percent of the prison population -- to keep the other 97
percent safe from gang leaders who want to intimidate or eliminate inmates who
step out of line. Ashker himself wrote that he would not "debrief" --
inform on others. "Many debriefers and their family members outside prison
have been seriously assaulted and killed."
When Ashker and three fellow members of the Short
Corridor Collective released an "agreement to end hostilities"
between racial groups at Pelican Bay, they drew a line between
"solid" inmates who never "debriefed" and "informers,
snitches, rats and obstructionists."
It's too bad that the prison groupies don't seem to
notice that Ashker, who earned a paralegal degree in prison, considers the SHU
to be torture, while he sort of winks at the coercion, even murder, of inmates
who "debrief." Ditto their families. Nor do they seem to think it odd
that these four leaders were able to call a cease-fire between gangs not to
save lives but to protest a system that keeps them out of the general prison
population.
Corrections officials report a steep drop in the number
of inmates participating in the hunger strike -- from 12,421 first reported to
have missed nine consecutive meals after the hunger strike began to 499 as of
Thursday.
Will hunger strike supporters protest if the state
force-feeds inmates as compassion dictates?
Ontiveros says the hunger strike can end whenever
officials agree to negotiate. Last year, Corrections revised SHU policies in
the wake of two 2011 hunger strikes.
I would not argue that every SHU policy is beyond
reproach, but the state should not buckle this time. The SHU is not torture.
It's a law enforcement tool designed to keep dangerous criminals from harming
other convicts. So why are the bleeding hearts applauding inmates who are
starving themselves so that the sharks can be released to terrorize the general
prison population?
No comments:
Post a Comment