By Ben Shapiro
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Last week, I appeared on CNN's "Piers Morgan
Tonight." For the past few weeks, Morgan had been inviting gun rights
defenders ranging from the reasonable to the nutty, and then slamming them by
appealing to the memory of the children slain at Sandy Hook. And when I
appeared with Morgan, that's precisely what I told him: "What you tend to
do is you tend to demonize people who differ from you politically by standing
on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook, saying they don't seem to care
enough about the dead kids." Morgan could only stammer, "How dare
you!"
A few nights later, he invited me on again, specifically
to stand once again on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook -- only this
time, he would bring the parents of those children to make the imagistic point.
His counterargument to accusation was to prove the veracity of my accusation.
But that's all the left's got on issues ranging from gun
control to the debt ceiling: appeals to emotion and to the supposed moral
shortcomings of their opposition. It's not just Piers Morgan doing this. It's
President Obama, who held a press conference on gun control flanked by small
children who had written him letters about violence using guns, then trotted
out the grief-stricken parents of one of the children who murdered at Sandy
Hook. "[M]ost of all," Obama intoned, " I think about how when
it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now, for
Grace, for the 25 other innocent children and devoted educators who had so much
left to give; for the men and women in big cities and small towns who fall
victims to senseless violence each and every day; for all the Americans who are
counting on us to keep them safe from harm."
Obama's implication is clear: disagree with him, and you
are fine with what happened in Sandy Hook.
That's a vile, despicable Maury Povich tactic. It's
daytime talk show material, not honest political discussion about how to solve
the problem of murder by guns in the United States. Not one of the solutions
Obama proposes would have stopped what happened in Sandy Hook. Adam Lanza would
have passed a background check. Lanza was armed with two handguns, not just an
AR-15. Limiting the number of rounds per magazine accomplishes nothing, since
it takes less than three seconds for a relative amateur to change magazines.
But here's the dirty little secret: this isn't about
preventing another Sandy Hook for the left. It is about political posturing. If
the left really wanted to be true to its own philosophy, it would simply
attempt to repeal the Second Amendment and go for a total British-style gun
ban. The vast majority of murders committed with guns in the United States are
committed with handguns. Yet the left insists that it wants to leave private
handgun ownership in place, while targeting so-called "assault
rifles." That's not an attempt at a solution, even from the left. It's
just preening for the cameras while pointing to the bodies of shooting victims.
We should be able to have a rational conversation in this
country about policies that could prevent another Sandy Hook. Measures with
regard to guns can be on the table -- so long as the discussion recognizes the
importance of the Second Amendment and balances the rights and responsibilities
of owning a firearm. But the left doesn't want to have that discussion. They
just want the warm glow of moral righteousness in their breasts, even as they
invade the rights of law-abiding citizens while making children less safe than
they otherwise would be.
No comments:
Post a Comment