By John Fund
Monday, January 07, 201
Just before Christmas, the local newspaper in New York’s
tony Westchester and Rockland Counties decided to respond to the horrific
shootings in nearby Newton, Conn., with its own version of insanity.
The Journal News published an interactive “gun map”
showing the names and addresses of thousands of local residents who have
handgun permits. The article’s headline read, “The Gun Owner Next Door: What
You Don’t Know about the Weapons in Your Neighborhood.” The paper explained
that it had obtained the records by filing Freedom of Information Act requests
with local officials. Publisher Janet Hasson defended the paper’s move by
stating, “We felt that sharing information about gun permits in our area was
important in the aftermath of the Newtown shootings.”
Judging from the outraged response, most of the paper’s
readers and many local officials disagree. Putnam County Clerk Dennis Sant,
announcing he would not follow the lead of officials in Westchester and
Rockland Counties, has refused to turn over records to the paper. By listing
the addresses of homes without guns, the paper has effectively drawn a map for
criminals, telling them which places to rob and “endangering our citizens,”
Sant said. County executive Mary Ellen Odell called the publication “reckless.”
One high-ranking official in Westchester County I spoke with notes that the
newspaper has put legitimate gun owners on an equal footing with sex offenders
and other criminals. “Maybe I’d like to see a map published of those accused of
defrauding the county government, but I’d never expect a paper to print one,”
he says.
Some local officials say that anyone who has had contact
with ex-criminals — including prosecutors, judges, jurors, and police — could
feel threatened now. Aron Wieder, a Democratic county legislator in Rockland
County, fears for his safety now that people know he doesn’t own a handgun. He
applied for a pistol permit last week. “I never owned a gun, but now I have no
choice,” he told reporters in a news conference Friday. “I’ll do anything,
anything to protect my family.”
Rockland County sheriff Louis Falco told Newsday that he
was appalled to learn that inmates at the county’s jail were taunting guards in
the days after the Journal News published its map. “They have inmates coming up
to them and telling them exactly where they live,” Falco said. “That’s not
acceptable to me.” Charlotte Swift, of Orangetown, says she experienced a flood
of emotion when she first saw the list: “I originally obtained a gun permit
because I had previously been married to a man who attempted to strangle me. .
. . The first emotion I felt was, ‘Oh my gosh, he can find me.’”
Ironically, some of the harshest critics of the Journal
News’s decision to publish the map are former burglars, such as Walter T. Shaw,
an ex-burglar whom the FBI blames for more than 3,000 break-ins during the
1960s and 1970s. Shaw told Fox News: “Having a list of who has a gun is like
gold — why rob that house when you can hit the one next door, where there are
no guns?”
Equally disturbing, crooks who need weapons now know
exactly where they can steal them. “Guns are on the top of the list of what you
want to steal,” Bob Portenier, a former armed house robber, told Fox. “They can
sell them to a gangbanger who ends up killing someone.”
But such arguments make no impression on knee-jerk
supporters of gun control. In Connecticut, Democratic representative Stephen
Dargan, the co-chair of the legislature’s public-safety committee, has
introduced a bill to make public the names and addresses of 170,000 people who
hold handgun permits in the state.
“I don’t know why a responsible gun owner is worried
about whether a permit for a revolver is FOI-able or not,” he told reporters.
In his view, it’s reasonable for people to want such information. “Maybe their
kids are going over to Johnny Smith’s, and maybe they want to see whether they
have guns in the house,” he suggested.
Richard Burgess, head of a local group that advocates for
Second Amendment rights, says Dargan’s bill is nonsensical. Homeowners with
rifles or shotguns don’t need permits in the state, he observed to a Hartford
Courant reporter, so no one would know if those weapons were in a home. “So,
really, you’re not getting a benefit out of it, and you’re only putting the gun
owner in danger.”
Liberals such as Dargan don’t see anything wrong in
publicly shaming those who legally own guns. When it comes to their own
personal safety, though, they are far more sensitive.
Take the Journal News executives who decided to publish
the gun map. The newspaper was so inundated with complaints that shortly after
Christmas it took extra security precautions and hired security guards — who
were armed — to patrol its Rockland County headquarters. The executives
reported no incidents of any kind at the building, but they turned over at
least two e-mails they found troubling. The local police said they didn’t find
the e-mails threatening and concluded that they “did not constitute an
offense.” The Journal News chose not to share with its readers the information
that it had hired armed security guards. That revelation came from a competing
newspaper, the Rockland County Times, which concluded that the Journal News
conducts itself according to the double standard: “Guns are good for the goose
but NOT for the gander.”
No comments:
Post a Comment