Wednesday, June 06, 2012
Only one group of Americans can make this nation a fairer
place: trial lawyers.
After all, crushing injustice has enveloped the nation.
New Yorkers make more money than Iowans. Female lawyers earn more than male
fishermen. People who are 6 feet tall -- and I saw this in a semi-scientific
study -- earn, on average, about $5,000 more annually than people who are 5
feet 6 inches tall. Beautiful women populate cable TV news shows, while doughy,
middle-aged, pale-skinned columnists are relegated to the Internet and
newspapers.
Unfair, but not ridiculous. For that, we turn to the
deeply stupid Paycheck Fairness Act, which failed to overcome GOP opposition in
the Senate (where Democrats pay female staffers 18 percent less than they do
men) this week.
Let's, for a moment, pretend that laws against
discrimination do not already exist. And let's, for the sake of argument, treat
the Paycheck Fairness Act as earnest policy meant to alleviate a terrible
societal mess rather than a political stunt that allows the White House (where
women make about 10K less annually than their male co-workers) to accuse half
the country of supporting a patriarchal dictatorship.
If we do, we can learn a lot about the left's view of
human nature, capitalism and choices.
Apparently, we live in a country dominated by misogynists
rather than in one resembling a meritocracy. If there's anything business
owners love more than money, it's hating women. Alas, without government, you
can never reach your potential. After all, the argument presupposed that the
gender pay gap is the result of widespread "discrimination" and
"unfairness" -- a matter so serious that a half-dozen senators were driven
to news conferences this week to explain how terrible the problem is. Sen. Dick
Durbin, D-Ill., said, "There will be Democrats in favor of ending this
discrimination, and virtually all Republicans -- and I hope that I'm wrong on
this -- are going to vote against it."
So now, if you don't support a bill that allows lawyers
to bore into the souls of employers and discern their motivations, you, my
friend, favor discrimination. You know, just like Susan Collins of Maine and
the woman haters on the editorial boards of The Boston Globe and The Washington
Post.
Women earn only 77 cents for every dollar men do. Period.
When there is moral preening to be done, even people who think of themselves as
the most thoughtful, sophisticated, non-ideological people on earth --
Democrats in Washington -- won't surrender to the complexity of an issue.
It is irrelevant that the pay gap may be the result of
innocent hiring practices. It doesn't matter if women more often -- and more
wisely -- take on fewer unpleasant or physically demanding jobs or that they
may often choose careers that weigh the importance of salary differently than
the ones men choose or that women -- and blame God or nature or both -- give
birth, take career breaks and are more inclined to take part-time jobs to be
able to mother those pesky kids.
As Christina Hoff Sommers of the American Enterprise
Institute points out, "an analysis of more than 50 peer-reviewed papers,
commissioned by the Labor Department, found that the so-called wage gap is
mostly, and perhaps entirely, an artifact of the different choices men and
women make -- different fields of study, different professions, different
balances between home and work."
Do Democrats really believe there is a war on women in
the workplace -- in their own offices, no less -- or do they simply want to
lord over every aspect of the employer-employee relationship? What's most
vitally "fair," it seems, is that Washington try to make the private
sector run like a public-sector union shop.
No comments:
Post a Comment