Thursday, December 28, 2023

Nikki Haley’s Sin Isn’t Racism

By Jeffrey Blehar

Thursday, December 28, 2023

 

While you and I were enjoying a sleepy, pleasantly aimless post-Christmas decompression period, some people out there apparently couldn’t leave well enough alone, and continue to labor under the delusion that they are running for the Republican nomination for president of the United States. This explains why, instead of enjoying holiday leftovers in the quiet of her own home, former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley was out there on the campaign trail yesterday in Berlin, N.H., casually holing her insurgent campaign’s entire raison d’etre below the waterline with the sort of gaffe that would matter more in an actually competitive race. I could ignore it, but hey: This is what she gets for not taking the end of the year off, like decent folk should.

 

Haley was doing the standard New Hampshire “town hall” gig on Wednesday — you know, field questions from the audience, basically demonstrate your retail chops and your ability to remember your pre-rehearsed beats like a pro while behaving recognizably human. (It’s a test that has defeated many a candidate; charisma matters.) She got a historical question from the crowd, one I myself would immediately have recognized as having a barb behind it: What, in the opinion of the former governor of South Carolina, caused the Civil War?

 

It’s a gimme question for all but the most craven, one where the ‘trap’ is obvious — the answer is “slavery,” don’t pretend it was anything other than slavery for all else truly was mere pretext — and of course Haley completely and embarrassingly whiffed on it. You can watch the clip here if you enjoy cringe humor; I instead listen to the former governor of the first state to secede from the nation and fire upon the Union talk about “the freedoms of what people could and couldn’t do” and think of Ellison’s “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream.”

 

I invite the reader instead to step back for a moment and enjoy what will probably be an attempt to gin up a little feeding frenzy in a primary race that has otherwise fallen into boredom and stasis. Trump is set to crush all comers (likely even in New Hampshire), and frankly everyone in the media is snored senseless with the non-story this entire cycle has become. Anything that even vaguely reminds reporters of the “horse race” they thought they were going to be covering this cycle will get an inordinate amount of coverage relative to its actual importance for the simple reason that hey, let’s face it: It’s the end of the year, Ron DeSantis’s poll numbers are trailing into irrelevance, and it’s Something To Do.

 

It’ll all be disingenuous nonsense, obviously, not worth taking even the slightest bit seriously. The most predictable and insulting outcome of Haley’s kerfuffle will be accusations that she is a racist. That’s entirely predictable because this is the route that media attacks always take, but in this case it’s particularly inapt as a club against the woman who took the Confederate flag off her own state’s capitol building years ago.

 

But what insults about it is that — lost in rote accusations of “racism blah blah GOP base blah blah” — we will avoid discussion of Nikki Haley’s real sin: holding her voters either in such contempt, or fear, that she can’t confidently state a simple truth. The real gaffe Haley committed on Wednesday was that, when she froze up under an unpredicted question and defaulted to her factory settings in answering, those answers demonstrated such contempt for the intelligence of her voters. We can be told the Civil War was about slavery, Nikki — we’re all adults here. Few politicians look good when caught nakedly pandering in public, but Nikki Haley wears the look witheringly poorly — it knocks out one of the key underlying struts currently upholding her fragile public brand. That’s why this little gaffe, however minor, memorably reveals something about Haley; we rarely get such accidental insight into how little politicians think of their own voters.

No comments: