By Dennis Prager
Tuesday, March 21, 2017
All addictions – whether drug, alcohol, gambling, sexual, or cigarettes – are very hard to escape.
There is one addiction, however, that might be more difficult than any other to escape – in part because it is not even regarded as an addiction. It is Entitlements Addiction, an addiction to getting something for nothing.
One indication as to the power of Entitlements Addiction is that, while great numbers of people have voluntarily given up – almost always at great pain – drugs, alcohol, gambling, etc., few give up an addiction to entitlements. For the majority of able-bodied people who get cash payments, food stamps, subsidized housing, free or subsidized health insurance, and other welfare benefits, the thought of giving up any one of those and beginning to pay for them with their own earned money is as hard as giving up alcohol is to an alcoholic.
Politicians know this, which is why it is close to impossible to ever reduce entitlements. And, of course, the Left knows this, which is why the Left almost always wins any debate over entitlements. Every American who is the beneficiary of an entitlement backs entitlements, and many who are not beneficiaries of entitlements would like to be.
This, aside from ideology, is why the Left constantly seeks to increase entitlements: The more people receive government benefits, the more people vote left.
In this sense, the Left in every country – in America, the Democratic party – should be regarded as a drug dealer. Virtually every American given a free benefit becomes an addict who relies more and more on his dealer. Which is exactly what the Left seeks.
As noted at the outset, one reason Entitlements Addiction is so powerful is that, unlike other addictions, it is not regarded as an addiction. As a result, few Entitlement Addicts see themselves as addicted. Why, then, would any of them seek treatment? To the Entitlement Addict, receiving entitlements is as natural and uncontroversial as breathing air. Air is free, and so are entitlements.
Another reason Entitlements Addiction is unique among addictions is that very few drug, alcohol, or gambling addicts believe that they are owed drugs, alcohol, or their gambling debts. Entitlement Addicts, on the other hand, believe that society owes them every entitlement they receive – and often more. The very word used, “entitlements,” conveys the message that the recipient has “a right” to the benefits. So there is a moral component to Entitlements Addiction that does not exist among other addicts (except for opioid dependents who are in pain; these patients really are indeed owed pain killers, and society is immoral for not allowing them to receive them).
Not only do Entitlement Addicts believe there is moral virtue to their addiction, so do a vast number of non-addicts known as Progressives. They believe that there is a moral imperative to give people more and more entitlements. This, in turn, feeds the moral self-image of those dependent on entitlements.
Yet another reason for the uniqueness of Entitlements Addiction is that ultimately it does more damage to society than any of the other addictions. Other addicts can ruin their own lives and those of loved ones, and drunk drivers kill and maim people. But society as a whole can survive their addictions. That is not the case with Entitlement Addicts. The more people who receive and come to depend on entitlements, the sooner the society will collapse economically. Society does not directly pay for drug addicts’ drugs, alcoholics’ alcohol, or the gambling debts of gambling, but society does pay every penny for Entitlement Addicts’ addiction. In fact, the current U.S. national debt is about equal to the $22 trillion this country has spent on entitlement programs in the last 50 years.
When you combine the addiction and selfishness of many (certainly not all) of those who are dependent on entitlements (including middle- and upper-class Americans who receive a home-mortgage deduction); the tendency for it to grow from one generation to the next; the dependence of one of the two major political parties on the votes of those who receive entitlements for its very existence; and the belief of tens of millions of non-addicted Progressives that society is morally obligated to give more and more people more and more entitlements, it becomes very difficult to see a solution.
In the meantime, the Entitlement State in every country is failing, forcing the countries to bring in tens of millions of migrants – many of whom share none of those countries’ values – to keep the Entitlement State alive.
This addiction ultimately ruins the character of many of its recipients, ruins the economy of all the countries in which it exists in large numbers, and ruins the value system that created the prosperity that made so many entitlements possible in the first place.
But, other than American conservatives, almost no one even recognizes it as a major problem, let alone an addiction.