By Noah Rothman
Tuesday, February 03, 2026
Why did Donald Trump announce this week that Washington,
D.C.’s John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts will be closed for the
next two years for extensive renovations? A project of that scale had not been
announced. Renovations were already underway with financial backing from a
specific congressional appropriation. Senator Susan
Collins (R., Maine) could not have been alone when she confessed that the
announcement came as “a big surprise to me.” The Kennedy Center’s own board of
trustees was “blindsided.”
Trump administration officials now maintain that the venue will soon be unusable
without significant repairs and maintenance, although it will remain open just
long enough to participate in the events centered around the nation’s 250th
birthday on July 4. It’s certainly true that the Kennedy Center cannot maintain
its current pace of operations without the repairs Congress funded last year,
even though Trump himself said that renovations would not disrupt the center’s
operations as recently as last October. It’s also true, however, that the Kennedy
Center cannot keep up its usual tempo in the absence of artists willing to perform there.
That’s where speculation has led the national press. The
conclusion that artist boycotts contributed to the venue’s shuttering is
supported by both the abrupt cancellation of scheduled Kennedy Center events amid
a revolt by talent and by claims from current and former staffers that the
venue had been mismanaged. “Rumors that Trump would shut down the Kennedy
Center have circulated since late fall of last year,” the Washington Post reported, “with many current and former
employees suggesting it would be a tourniquet to stop the press coverage of
declining ticket sales and artists boycotts.”
The naked political biases of grudge-bearing artists and
Kennedy Center stewards notwithstanding, the venue did see a significant
decline in ticket sales last year. And that was before the
president put his own name on the building’s façade, inspiring a wave of canceled performances from the acts that the venue had
already booked.
We can be skeptical of the motives of those who offer a
pat explanation for this still mysterious turn of events while also concluding
that this could not be what Donald Trump wanted. If there’s one thing you can
say for sure about this president, he loves the Kennedy Center. The
president kept his distance from it during his first term in office amid the
refusal of so many artists to perform there while Trump occupied the Oval
Office (a relevant data point for those who insist it was only this president who
politicized its stage), but he seemed determined this time around not to be
deprived of its pleasures.
Trump took an unusually active role in the Kennedy
Center’s management and programming early in his second term. He named himself
chairman of the venue’s board last spring. In recorded meetings, the audio of
which was reviewed by the press, the president named specific acts
that should play there and identified a number of artists he believed should be
Kennedy Center honorees. “In the past, I mean, these are radical left lunatics
that have been chosen,” Trump said at the time. “I didn’t like it. I couldn’t
watch it. And the host was always terrible.” Indeed, the president even flirted
with hosting the award ceremony himself.
Overhauling not just how the Kennedy Center looked but
how it was run clearly became a presidential passion project. It is a project
that will end prematurely this summer. The president made it plain to all that
he wanted to leave an indelible mark on the place, and he has. Like John
Steinbeck’s Lennie Small, Trump held the object of his affection too close,
inadvertently throttling it.
No comments:
Post a Comment