National
Review Online
Tuesday,
January 10, 2023
If there
is one thing that Americans understand about inflation, it is that a dollar
today is worth less than it was, an unpleasant reality of which they are
constantly being reminded as the country approaches the second
anniversary of
what we were quickly assured was a transitory surge
in prices.
Most
Americans, we suspect, also understand that compounding adds to the force with
which inflation corrodes the value of the dollar over time. The period between
2010 and 2020 was one of low inflation. Even so, after adjusting for changes in
the CPI, the purchasing power of a dollar had shrunk by just under 15
percent over
the period. As of now, the dollar’s purchasing power has shrunk by a total
of 27 percent
since 2010. Applying
those numbers to $100 invested in 2010 (and, for simplicity’s sake, ignoring
receipt of interest, dividends, or the like), the investment would have had to
have been worth nearly $137 today just to keep pace with
prices. But any investors who invested $100 in 2010 and sold that investment
today at, say, $125, would be taxed on the nominal gain of $25, even though in
real terms they had suffered a loss of $12. A tax on illusory capital gains
would, in effect, have been transformed into an all too real inflation tax.
Even
when investors succeed in outperforming the CPI, some of the gain they make on
selling their investment will, absent enough deflation over the relevant
period, be nominal, meaning that part of the tax they will be paying on that
gain is still an inflation tax. That inflation is, more often than not, the
product of policy decisions made in Washington only adds insult to injury.
It’s
true that that $100 investment would, as noted above, most likely have
generated some current return before being sold, but that return would almost
certainly have been taxed too. And anyone arguing that many asset classes have
performed much, much better than inflation in recent years (2022 was a little
trickier) is missing the fundamental point, which is that nominal capital gains
are not the same as real return. Investors in the 1970s knew this all too well.
In nominal terms, the S&P 500 was roughly 20
percent higher
at the end of the decade than at the beginning, but in real terms it had fallen
by 40 percent.
The
inflation tax is inequitable and — by increasing the effective tax rate on capital
gains and discouraging long-term investment — destructive. It should be
repealed. The best (if somewhat rough and ready) way to do this would be to tax
only capital gains in excess of the increase in the CPI over the period an
asset is held.
Indexation
of capital gains has been relatively high on the agenda at various times over
the years, including during the Reagan and (briefly) Trump administrations, and ahead of the Republican triumph in the
1994 midterms. With inflation having run at an elevated level since early 2021,
increasing numbers of Americans are now having to face sharply higher taxes on
gains that do not, in any real sense, exist. Republicans now have a
majority, however tenuous, in the House. Any tax plan they advance
should include an end to the taxation of phantom gains.
No comments:
Post a Comment