By Jim Geraghty
Wednesday, July 13, 2022
Yesterday, I warned people to brace for another month of bad inflation numbers. This
morning, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released the new inflation numbers
for the month of June, and somehow, they’re even worse than the grim forecast:
Shoppers paid sharply higher prices
for a variety of goods in June as inflation kept its hold on a slowing U.S.
economy, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday.
The consumer price index, a broad
measure of everyday goods and services, soared 9.1% from a year ago, above the
8.8% Dow Jones estimate. That marked another month of the fastest pace for
inflation going back to December 1981.
Here are the U.S. inflation numbers, by month, since October: 6.2
percent, 6.8 percent, 7 percent, 7.4 percent, 7.8 percent, 8.5 percent, 8.2
percent, 8.6 percent, and now 9.1 percent.
That’s an absolutely brutal stretch, and the American
people would be infuriated by it under any circumstances. But I suspect there’s
particular anger among anyone who remembers Biden’s declaring about a year ago, “Our experts believe
and the data shows that most of the price increases we’ve seen are — were
expected and expected to be temporary. . . . There’s nobody suggesting there’s
unchecked inflation on the way — no serious economist.”
Back in December, Biden said he thought inflation had peaked.
This should end the silly talk that the upcoming midterm
elections will revolve around abortion, gun control, or the January 6
committee’s findings. Runaway inflation is the five-alarm fire that is burning
down the American economy. The Biden administration keeps telling Americans
that things are about to get better — that skyrocketing prices for gasoline,
food, and just about everything they buy will start to ease. And month after
month, Americans keep waiting.
Don’t forget, there is a good chance that, on the
morning of July 29, the headline will be, “U.S.
Now in Recession.”
Our Insecure President
One of the many problems of the Biden administration —
and in fact one of its most severe, self-inflicted wounds — is the president’s
reflexive defensiveness and denial when presented with bad news, new
challenges, or evidence of failure.
Biden couldn’t just accept that some citizens of Central
American countries interpreted his campaign rhetoric as an invitation to
immigrate. He insisted that the surge in illegal immigrants at the border was
just part of a routine seasonal pattern: “It happens every single, solitary year: There is a
significant increase in the number of people coming to the border in the winter
months of January, February, March. That happens every year.”
Except it wasn’t, and that surge of migrants is still
ongoing. And quite a few of them are being kept here in the U.S. instead of
deported. Jeffrey Anderson, writing in City Journal earlier this week,
noted that:
DHS statistics show that from
Biden’s Inauguration Day through May 2022 — just 16 months and change — about
1.05 million migrants were apprehended on the southwestern border and then
released into the U.S. That’s more than were apprehended on that border and
released into the U.S. during the four years from Fiscal Year 2017 through
Fiscal Year 2020. Under Biden, authorities have detained and released into the
U.S. about 2,200 migrants a day on average — four times as many as the
approximately 550 per day apprehended and released during the eight fiscal
years preceding Biden. And these tallies don’t include unaccompanied minors,
let alone the unknown sums of people who have evaded capture.
If all 1.05 million of those
migrants had settled in one place, forming a wholly new city in the process,
that new settlement would now be the tenth-largest city in the U.S.
Forty-four of the 50 states don’t have a single city that large.
As mentioned on The Editors yesterday,
it’s not just that Joe Biden stands by his indisputably troubled and
scandal-ridden son, Hunter. It’s that he insists that Hunter is “the smartest
man I know” and that he’s confident Hunter has done nothing wrong.
Touting the capabilities of the Afghan army, dismissing
reports of the Taliban’s strength, insisting Iran can be a reasonable
negotiating partner . . . Biden keeps assuring us that everything will turn out
fine. When things don’t turn out fine and disaster ensues, Biden insists he
would have had to have been “a mind reader” to see the problem coming.
Joe Biden has been around American politics for a long,
long time, and even the portraits that are relatively flattering, such as Richard Ben Cramer’s What It Takes, portray
Biden as having deep-rooted insecurity, a constant need to prove how smart he
is, and a prickly defensiveness at even the fairest criticism. Biden has a hard
time changing course because that means admitting that his first decision was
wrong.
Back in 1987, when taking questions at a campaign event
in New Hampshire, Biden unleashed what the Washington Post called
“his worst moment,” and it is rather spectacular for its raw
portrait of a man bristling at the slightest possibility of criticism, and
consumed with the fear that other people don’t think of him as smart:
“I think I have a much higher IQ
than you, I suspect. I went to law school on a full academic scholarship — the
only one in my class to have full academic scholarship. The first year in law
school, I decided I didn’t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom
two-thirds of my class. And then decided I wanted to stay and went back to law
school and, in fact, ended up in the top half of my class. I won the
international moot court competition. I was the outstanding student in the
political science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three
degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits; you only needed 123 credits.
I would be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours, Frank.”
Some may hear echoes of Fredo’s
outburst from Godfather II — “I’m smart, and I want
respect!”
It will probably not shock you to learn that Biden wildly
exaggerated his credentials, as the Post noted:
·
Biden did not go to Syracuse Law School on a
“full academic scholarship.” It was a half scholarship based on financial need.
·
He didn’t finish in the “top half” of his class.
He was 76th out of 85.
·
He did not win the award given to the
outstanding political-science student at his undergraduate college, the
University of Delaware.
·
He didn’t graduate from Delaware with “three
degrees,” but with a single B.A. in political science and history.
Three decades later, again as a presidential candidate in
New Hampshire, Biden had another weirdly hostile, defensive exchange with a
voter. The woman asked Biden why his supporters should trust that he could
turn his campaign around after a fourth-place finish in the Iowa caucuses.
Biden asked her if she’s ever been to a caucus before; when she said yes, Biden
snapped, “No, you haven’t. You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier.”
In Biden’s mind, the problem couldn’t possibly be that he
had turned in a disappointing performance in Iowa; it had to be that the young
woman just didn’t understand the caucus system. When she surprised him and said
she had been to a caucus before, Biden’s mind rejected the possibility. (It is
rather ironic that the allegedly feminism-friendly Democratic Party ended up nominating
the Lord of the Mansplainers.)
No comments:
Post a Comment