By Jim Geraghty
Thursday, July 07, 2022
After almost three years in office, United Kingdom prime
minister Boris Johnson announced today that he would resign once his party
chose a new leader, Reuters reports.
Just
two days ago, our Maddy Kearns noted Johnson’s changing story about whether
he knew about allegations of sexual misconduct against Chris Pincher, the
deputy chief whip of Conservatives in the U.K. Parliament, and summarized the
exasperation with the troubled prime minister: “Boris Johnson was caught lying
to cover himself. (Again.) More resignations could be forthcoming but, as with
the no-confidence vote last month, when it comes to loyalty to the prime
minister, there is an unsustainable split in the Tory party. It’s now not a
question of whether Johnson goes, only when.”
Two days later, it turns out.
If you were going to lead a major world power, July 2019 was a hellacious time to take the helm, quiet as
that summer may appear in retrospect. The Covid-19 pandemic was just around the
corner, and Johnson himself suffered a life-threatening infection early in the
pandemic. Covid not only offered an unprecedented international public-health
crisis, but it brought the world economy to a screeching halt and exacerbated
existing social tensions. The lockdowns in the United Kingdom were generally
even stricter, more sweeping, and longer-lasting than the ones in the United
States. While the British welcomed the end of the lockdowns, as our Diana Glebova notes, “Johnson has been embroiled in
controversy ever since it was revealed that he hosted parties at his Downing
Street office while imposing restrictions meant to curb the spread of Covid-19
on the rest of the country.”
And then, earlier this year, Russia invaded Ukraine, sending
economic and geopolitical aftershocks reverberating throughout the continent,
and with particularly strong consequences in London, a favorite home away from home for Russian millionaires and
billionaires. While the U.K.’s inflation rate wasn’t quite as bad as
America’s for much of the past year or so, by June, it had hit 9.1 percent — a dire crisis in a country
that already has a high cost of living.
Johnson’s departure is the result of a series of personal
scandals, controversies, and long-simmering national problems that accumulated
weight and momentum like a snowball rolling down a hill. He entered 10 Downing
Street with a reputation for being undisciplined but brilliant. He leaves with
a reputation for being undisciplined and probably not as brilliant as he thinks
he is.
The United Kingdom has a housing
crisis more widespread and insidious than the one that plagues our major cities
in the United States. It also needs terrific investment in its transportation.
The closest that Johnson’s premiership ever came to addressing these was their
plan to “level up” depressed and forgotten parts of England and Scotland —
making them more attractive places to invest, work, and live. But this agenda
has mostly been throwing cash around in a disorganized way. Johnson’s
government has been in a rut. The scandals hit just as inflation did, and No.
10 got stuck in fighting to renegotiate the Northern Ireland Protocol — a
U.K.–EU–Ireland arrangement that provokes the Unionist community — to which
Johnson agreed in order to deliver Brexit.
For a long time, Johnson managed to overcome what seemed
like glaring personal deficiencies with a certain goofy charisma and his crazy
unkempt hair, what I called three years ago “an endless volley of
witty, eccentric, self-deprecating charm.” That charm stopped
working — but as MBD notes, that asset will not be easily replicated by anyone
else currently in Conservative politics:
I see zero evidence that another
Tory figure can replicate or come close to rebuilding that coalition. The
Thatcher-nostalgists will alienate both the traditional Labour voters and the
Cameronized Tory party of the southeast of England. A successful Tory party in
2022 needs to campaign on completely different ideological terrain than what it
conquered decades ago. The only man in the Tory squad with the creativity,
ambition, and willingness to change so as to discover this territory is Boris
Johnson.
As Dan McLaughlin observes, after Johnson rose to power and
then won a snap election “on the lingering Brexit question, I said that if he
did nothing else, Brexit would ensure him a legacy. Having gotten Brexit done,
he has his legacy, but he did nothing else. ”
Samuel Gregg, the director of research at the Acton
Institute, wrote late last month that Johnson increasingly came to be perceived
as standing for nothing in particular beyond himself:
To the extent that Brexit
represented successful pushback against the supra-nationalism favored by
left-liberal politicians, NGOs, and internationalist bureaucrats, it was a
conservative triumph. But beyond that triumph, Johnson’s government has looked
distinctly devoid of any conservative vision or policy program.
Indeed, the Tories under Johnson
have veered away from conservatism in many areas. They have raised National
Insurance rates and corporate taxes, and shown no inclination to cut public
spending. Johnson’s government has even pushed for a “green industrial revolution” that bears more than a passing
resemblance to the Green New Deal. The Conservatives have also done little to
halt woke takeovers of institutions such as the National Trust, and they’ve
shown no signs of coming to grips with the U.K.’s growing illegal-immigration
problem.
In short, there’s no indication of
any major Tory commitment to things like greater economic liberty and
smaller-but-strong government.
Just a few days ago, our Andrew Stuttaford looked at Johnson’s environmental and
energy agendas and foresaw a path to energy rationing:
That Britain has become a poster
child for the stupidities of the current state of climate policy does not say
much for its governing (if that’s the word) Conservative party. That all
Britain’s other major parties would push the climate agenda in roughly the same
direction does not change that fact, or the increasing possibility that the
Tories, having squandered their great victory in 2019, are headed for defeat in
2024.
With Conservatives like this, who needs the Labor Party?
Last night, MSNBC’s Chris Hayes described Boris Johnson as the British
version of Donald Trump: “‘What you are seeing now is what it looks like
when a conservative party decides they have had enough and that a leader is
just too much of a menace to be tolerated,’ says Chris Hayes. ‘This pressure on
Boris Johnson is a stark reminder that it can still happen.’”
If you squint, you can see some similarities between
Trump and Johnson — on the right, larger-than-life personalities, striking
appearances, a certain shamelessness and determination to just keep on going
amidst great controversies. But no U.K. leader is ever a precise analogue to an
American one, and I am skeptical that Trump is really the most relevant
comparison right now.
Boris Johnson and Joe Biden are dramatically different
personalities and often differ in their governing philosophies. But the mood
described over in U.K. politics sounds a lot like the current one here in the
U.S.: widespread, mounting frustration with the status quo; a growing
resentment over the fact that the country’s political elites are economically
and socially walled off from the gritty realities of the average citizen; and a
sense that the current leader is just overwhelmed by the scale of the crises
and incapable of rising to the task. Maybe the similarities stop there, but
with the U.K. about to get a new leader and the U.S midterm elections
approaching, that similarity seems resonant.
No comments:
Post a Comment