By Charles C. W. Cooke
Thursday, May 26, 2022
Addressing the atrocity in Uvalde, Dan writes that
numbers aren’t everything, but they
should inform our sense of proportion in nationwide policy-making. Some
perspective on the size of the problem and the direction of the trend is always
important. The Associated Press counts 169 deaths in 23 years. That’s a lot in absolute terms,
especially when we’re discussing innocent schoolchildren. But it is also seven
deaths per year, compared with 43 per year by lightning, 300 per year by
toasters, 800 per year by bedsheets, and of course, over 800,000 per year by
abortion.
As Dan implies, these numbers can sound callous. But now
that figures such as Representative Eric Swalwell have begun making contrary
claims on TV, they are important to note nevertheless. “Look at the
statistics!” is an ugly and non-responsive thing to say to a grieving parent,
but it is an entirely necessary thing to say to someone who is
making a hard claim about generalized risk, as Swalwell most certainly is.
On MSNBC yesterday, Swalwell claimed that “it’s a lie to
tell our children that they are safe at school.” But it’s not. It’s a lie to
tell them otherwise. Government
data show that around 54 million American children currently attend
school (public and private), and that somewhere between 3.4 million and 4.6
million children enter those schools each year. If we use 4 million as a rough
guide for the latter number, by my back-of-the-envelope math, this means that,
over the last 23 years, 146 million children have been enrolled in America’s
131,000 schools at some point. That 169 people (including teachers and
other staff) have been murdered in that period is utterly appalling. But it
does not indicate that our schools are “unsafe.” It indicates that we have an
extremely specific problem with extremely rare attacks. In no other circumstance
would we conclude that a risk factor of just under one in a million makes one
“unsafe.”
I will readily admit that, being human, I often fall
victim to exactly the same instincts as Swalwell. When the news broke on
Tuesday, I immediately worried about my own children, and I immediately adopted
a view of American schools that was both entirely emotionally understandable
and entirely statistically illiterate. As an adult, it was my duty to get those
feelings under control, to put this issue in its correct context, and then to
think seriously about what we should do next. It was not my
duty to indulge my fear, to cynically tie it to my pre-existing political
preferences, and to tell millions of other scared, hurting, frustrated parents
that their children were statistically unsafe. Eric Swalwell is a U.S.
representative. That he failed this test is a shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment