National Review
Online
Monday, May 23,
2022
Joshua Katz is an eminent classics
professor who holds degrees from Yale, Oxford, and Harvard, and is the Cotsen
Professor in the Humanities at Princeton University. But he refused to bow to
the new “anti-racist” orthodoxy, and for that transgression, Princeton is
apparently preparing to strip him of tenure and terminate his employment. This
act would be a shameful repudiation of what is supposed to be one of the core
missions of a great university — and Princeton alumni and donors should make
their voices heard while the board of trustees deliberates on Katz’s
fate.
Katz became persona non grata at Princeton
in the perfervid and rageful summer of 2020, when he published an essay in Quillette
in which he referred to a defunct student group, the Black Justice League, as
“a small local terrorist organization.” Strong phrasing, but hardly worthy of a
raised eyebrow in an academic environment in which professors freely and
regularly denounce conservatives and Republicans as fascists. The group in 2015
had occupied the university president’s office, and Katz noted that the group
“went after one fellow black student with particular vigor, verbally vilifying
her in public at every possible opportunity, calling her all sorts of unsavory
epithets and accusing her of ‘performing white supremacy.’”
The university’s president Christopher
Eisgruber publicly denounced Katz and made him something of an Emmanuel
Goldstein figure, an official hate target. But though a university spokesman
vowed a formal investigation would follow, apparently it never got off the
ground. Katz is a tenured professor, and Princeton is bound to respect his
right to express himself.
The twist arrived in February 2021, when
the Daily Princetonian dug up more details about an unrelated Katz
controversy: Some 15 years ago, he had a consensual affair with a student,
which is against Princeton rules. After a formal investigation, in which the
ex-student in question declined to participate, Katz accepted as a disciplinary
measure an unpaid year off. The matter was closed in 2018, but the university
reopened the case this year after the Princetonian report, which among
other claims reported that two women Katz had taken out to dinner felt uncomfortable
about it.
Faculty Dean Gene A. Jarrett, according to
the New York Times, issued a ten-page report last November that
upbraided Katz for not being sufficiently forthcoming about the affair — he is
now said to have discouraged the student both from seeking therapy and from
participating in the initial investigation — and recommended his termination.
The Washington Free Beacon reported last week that Eisgruber agreed and
took the recommendation to the board.
What Princeton is preparing to do gives
off a revolting odor of using a long-settled matter as a pretext to punish one
of its most distinguished professors because he dared to challenge race
orthodoxy. The impression Princeton is creating is that elite institutions are
now moving into punishing dissent from the leftist catechism by veering off
into character assassination. The potential for a catastrophic chilling effect
on academic freedom of thought is obvious. Princeton should take a deep breath
and rethink whether appeasing the mob of race obsessives is worth the
reputational damage to a nearly 300-year-old institution.
No comments:
Post a Comment