By Tom Cotton
Monday,
September 20, 2021
Last year, for the first time in
American history, more than 100,000 Americans died as a result of drug
overdoses and homicides. This deadly contagion of crime continues to
afflict our communities and even shows signs of worsening. Yet politicians in
Washington plan to reduce federal sentences for criminals and release thousands
of drug traffickers and gang members back onto the streets.
Recently, the Senate Judiciary Committee
has approved several bills that would take criminal leniency to new extremes
and public safety to new lows. These bills would shorten sentences for heroin
and fentanyl traffickers, grant early release to thousands of drug dealers,
expand house arrest for drug kingpins, and prohibit judges from taking into
account certain past criminal activity in sentencing. Unwise even in a normal
year, this salvo of pro-crime policies will exacerbate record-high overdose
deaths and violent crime.
Some Senate Judiciary Committee members
are also pushing a badly misnamed bill, the Eliminating a Quantifiably Unjust
Application of the Law (EQUAL) Act, which would retroactively reduce prison
sentences for convicted crack-cocaine traffickers and force prosecutors to
treat crack- and powder-cocaine-trafficking equally. Not all illegal drugs
inflict the same damage on society, and we shouldn’t treat them as though they
do. However, if activists demand equality, we should increase sentences for
powder cocaine to match crack sentences, not reduce sentences on crack to match
those for powder cocaine.
Senate Democrats additionally want to make
permanent a temporary coronavirus policy that sent 4,500 “at-risk” federal
prisoners to spend their prison sentences at home. Unsurprisingly, the federal
government’s definition of “at risk” strained credulity, with ailments
including asthma and obesity treated as get-out-of-jail-free cards. Extending
this policy — especially now that every single federal inmate has been
vaccinated or offered the vaccine for COVID-19 — betrays victims and
law-enforcement agencies that trusted the federal government to keep convicted
criminals away from the neighborhoods that the offenders once terrorized.
Federal incarceration keeps notorious criminals far from their communities and
thereby limits their capacity to maintain their criminal enterprises and their
ability to intimidate victims and witnesses from the inside. Granting mass home
release nullifies the advantages of federal incarceration and sets a terrible
precedent that Senate Democrats would try to expand.
The Biden administration has a similar
campaign of criminal accommodation under way and this month inexplicably
proposed legislation to reduce sentences for trafficking in fentanyl analogues.
Why should we grant leniency to some of the deadliest drug dealers in the midst
of a spiraling opioid crisis, especially when it would encourage
traffickers to distribute fentanyl instead of other drugs? Just two milligrams
of fentanyl — the equivalent of a few grains of sand — can kill an adult,
making it one of the most potent illicit poisons ever sold on the streets.
Nevertheless, today’s Democratic Party can’t find a drug sentence that they
don’t want to reduce.
This wave of proposed soft-on-crime
legislation is the poisonous continuation of the First Step Act, which
retroactively released serious drug traffickers, in particular crack dealers,
and helped many career criminals avoid tough sentences. This legislation was a
bipartisan mistake that Democrats believe they can build on in a 50–50 Senate.
Republicans should not cooperate or compromise on this issue of life and death.
In 2018, I warned that the First Step Act
was a jailbreak bill that would cause more crime and suffering in American
communities. I was right. Since its passage in 2018, drug-overdose deaths have
skyrocketed. In particular, cocaine-overdose deaths have surged over 30 percent
to become the second-most deadly drug threat. The Department of Justice has
also conspicuously refused to release recidivism data on First Step Act
beneficiaries. Thousands of released drug traffickers undoubtedly contributed
to last year’s massive upswing in drug deaths and the growing gang violence in
our cities. This criminal-leniency law was a step backward in the
administration of justice — and we should ensure that this first step is also
the last.
For decades, the federal prison system
delivered firm and effective sentences to drug traffickers and violent
criminals. Indeed, our federal prisons stop the greatest menaces to society by
keeping them away from the communities that they victimized. Soft-on-crime
policies undermine these necessary institutions. For example, states and
localities might reduce their cooperation with federal authorities if criminals
are treated more leniently at the federal level than on the state level. This
would hurt the American rule of law and render our federal prison system
impotent.
Criminals do not respect or appreciate
weakness; they exploit and abuse it. Leniency has once again failed, with truly
heartbreaking consequences. It is time to get tough on crime, end the
jailbreaks, and lock up the murderers and merchants of misery who have
inflicted such harm on our nation. The crime wave will not recede until we do.
No comments:
Post a Comment