By Charles C. W. Cooke
Tuesday, August 31, 2021
Joe Biden should resolve to stop talking about the
death of his son, Beau. He should do this immediately, he should do it without
exception, and he should keep doing it until the exact moment he ceases to be
president of the United States.
At some point in the recent past, President Biden has
been informed by his acolytes that he is considered an empathetic man, and,
moreover, that one of the causes of this reputation is that he has suffered an
unusual number of personal tragedies — including, in 2015, the loss of his
elder son. Unfortunately, at some point in the recent past, President
Biden also seems to have been told that he can reproduce that
empathy at a moment’s notice with the mere utterance of Beau’s name. Since last
week’s terror attack in Kabul, in which 13 members of the American military
were killed, Biden has repeatedly attempted to use his own heartbreak as a
shield. Addressing the massacre from the White House last week, the
president described himself as “the father of an Army major who
served for a year in Iraq and, before that, was in Kosovo as a U.S. attorney
for the better part of six months in the middle of a war,” and submitted that,
as a result, he had “some sense, like many of you do, what the families of
these brave heroes are feeling today.” Biden used this line again on
Sunday, while meeting with the families of the slain. He used it yet again
during his victory-lap press conference this afternoon. And, demonstrating that
it has now become an official line, Biden’s press secretary, Jen Psaki, used it today, too. On all four occasions, it was a deeply
inappropriate tack to take.
What happened to Beau Biden was, indeed, terrible. But
the comparison with the Kabul Thirteen is grotesque. Beau Biden did not die
violently, in combat, while serving on the front lines in a foreign land, but
of brain cancer, after a long medical struggle, in an American hospital. Beau
Biden was a soldier who died too young; but he did not die too young while
soldiering. And Joe Biden is not some powerless parent; as a senator he voted
to authorize the war, and as president he contrived the plan that led to the
failure that led to the bloodbath. At the margin, it is true that President
Biden has “some sense, like many of you do, what the families of these brave
heroes are feeling today.” But this is also true of anyone in the world who has
lost someone they dearly loved. Mercifully, Joe Biden is not a Gold Star
parent. Mercifully, Joe Biden does not have any particular insight into the
experiences of Gold Star parents. Next time he stands at a podium, it would be
appropriate for him to remember that.
As a rule, one should always temper comments made by
people who are in agony. And yet, reading through the reports from Biden’s
meetings with the families of the deceased, a definite pattern emerges.
According to the Washington Post, the widow of Rylee McCollum was disappointed that Biden “kept checking his watch
and bringing up Beau.” Mark Schmitz, the father of another fallen Marine, Jared
Schmitz, noted that “it just didn’t seem that appropriate to spend that much
time on his own son,” and recorded that when he suggested that Biden learn more
about those killed, he was met with the irritated rejoinder, “I do know their
stories.” And Shana Chappell, the mother of Marine Kareem Nikoui, wrote to
Biden on Facebook “you tried to interrupt me and give me your own sob story.”
There is, of course, nothing that Biden could have said to have forestalled
some of the anger thrown his way. That, though, is no excuse for making it
worse.
And, besides, even if Biden’s experiences were closely
relevant to the topic at hand, he would still be obliged to remain silent about
them while publicly mourning the slain. The appropriate way to deal with people
who are consumed by anguish is to listen quietly and to absorb as much of their
pain as possible. It is not to say, “You know, what you’re
telling me about yourself actually reminds me quite a lot of me” — especially when
you yourself are responsible for the death being grieved over. At present, Joe
Biden is the president of the United States; he is the commander in chief; he
is the guy in the room where it happens. In circumstances such as these, his
job is to thank the families for their sacrifice, and then to remain silent
while they say whatever they wish to say — however rude or frenzied or
heartbroken they may be. Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not mention Franklin Jr.
after the horrors of D-Day. Abraham Lincoln did not refer to Willie during the
Gettysburg Address. George Washington did not invoke Martha Parke Custis in his
speech at Valley Forge. And nor would it have occurred to them to do so. There
is a time, a place, and an office for such things. And this is most certainly
not it.
No comments:
Post a Comment