By Noah Rothman
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
California—a state that by itself constitutes the world’s
fifth-largest economy, is endowed with vast stores of human and natural
resources, and has one of the planet’s most amenable climates for human
habitation—is failing.
The Golden State is host to one of the country’s worst
homelessness epidemics. It’s a state in which 19th century diseases such as
typhus and tuberculosis are making a comeback. More people are moving out of
the state than into it. Its rates of violent crime are on the rise. It has more
failing schools than any other state in the Union. And now, true to basket-case
form, California is home to massive, rolling power outages. But unlike in the
developing world, these blackouts are not a result of resource deficiency but
the voluntary imposition of darkness on the public.
Last year, California endured its deadliest and most
destructive wildfire in the state’s history. That costly disaster has since
been linked to a faulty transmission line operated by Pacific Gas &
Electric. In the year that followed, PG&E has become the target of much of
the public’s anger over the state’s increasingly destructive fires. That
utility, which serves 16 million Californians, declared bankruptcy and lost
control of the internal restructuring process. The electricity provider faces
increasing pressure from the state’s progressive officeholders, who back a
hostile process to transform the energy provider into a public utility. Perhaps
most devastating, the state’s supreme court has ruled that utilities must eat
the costs associated with electricity-caused wildfires regardless of whether
they were accidental or the result of negligence. Amid this backdrop, PG&E
has resolved to preventatively cut its services for Californians in the path of
the hot and dry Santa Ana winds that fuel the state’s brushfires.
The impact on Golden State citizens who must now make do
without this vital aspect of modern life has been dramatic. Perishable foods
have been lost, costing individual households and restaurants tens of thousands
of dollars. Hundreds of schools have been closed with little or no warning. The
estimated 30,000 Californians who are sick or infirm and do not have access to
gasoline-powered backup generators were left without functioning medical
equipment. At least one death is attributable to what PG&E euphemistically
deems Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS).
It’s not entirely clear that this approach is
accomplishing anything. PG&E and other power providers in the state lack
the resources to build extensive networks of sensors and cameras that could
pinpoint fire-prone areas or insulate all its transmission lines. Forecasting
wind speed, direction, and duration is a complicated science, and some
forecasts don’t materialize, causing consternation for PG&E’s cut off
customers. And while a warming climate likely contributes to longer dry seasons
and atmospheric volatility, which yields stronger winds, climate change is not
the all-purpose excuse activists would like it to be. Even California Gov.
Gavin Newsom—no shrinking violet when it comes to climate activism—has chided
catastrophists on his side of the aisle for their myopia. “This is not, from my
perspective, a climate-change story as much as a story about greed and
mismanagement over the course of decades,” the governor said.
While utility providers make a convenient scapegoat,
public policy is more to blame for California’s conundrum. Most wildfires are
not caused by faulty electrical equipment but natural factors and human error.
The state’s utilities are required by law to extend their networks to housing
developed in high-risk areas, and, in a state with an acute housing shortage,
more and more residences are built inside danger zones. What’s more, the
patchwork of federal, state, local, tribal, and private interests that are
responsible for forestry management have run up against the state’s onerous
regulatory environment. A 2018 study conducted by the California Legislative
Analyst’s Office found that “overcrowded forests” have contributed to the
increased death of vegetation from stress and disease, resulting in a glut of
combustible fuels on the forest floors. The report blames current forest
management practices for imposing “limitations on timber harvesting” and
“environmental permitting requirements” that “constrain the amount of trees and
other growth removed from the forest.”
The response to this complicated problem has been to
impose “de-energization” on the state’s residents while making whatever power
they can still access more expensive.
On the other side of the country, New Yorkers are also
struggling to fulfill their power needs, but their deprivation has nothing to
do with wildfires. New York’s National Grid has warned for months that new
natural-gas customer applications for consumers in New York City and Long
Island would be delayed if the state did not permit the construction of new
pipelines from neighboring Pennsylvania. The Keystone State is rapidly
harvesting gas locked inside the Marcellus Shale formation, much of which is
located across the border in New York. But due to Albany’s fracking ban and its
reluctance to finance new pipelines, New York cannot access the gas it’s
providentially situated above, and it is increasingly unable to deliver that
cleaner-burning fuel to its residents.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has demagogued the issue,
blaming power companies for failing New York residents. “National Grid has a
gun to the head of the people of the State of New York,” Cuomo said last week.
He has responded to the crisis by compelling utility providers to restore
service to the thousands of downstate customers who had been denied access to
gas, but a gubernatorial mandate does not address the underlying need for a
sustainable source of natural gas. Ironically, the state’s environmental
regulations will have the effect of forcing New Yorkers to transition back to
dirtier fossil fuels such as oil.
The story is much the same in Massachusetts, where
Holyoke Gas & Electric announced early this year that it was suspending new
natural-gas connections as a response to “insufficient pipeline capacity in our
region to deliver additional load.” They were joined by Middleborough Gas and
Electric Department, which also capped its delivery capacity due to “pipeline
constraints.” In a country that will become a net energy exporter next year due
to its newfound capacity to exploit new sources of natural gas, it’s
unconscionable for the Northeast’s richest and most populous states to struggle
with gas shortages.
In some of the nation’s most reliably Democratic states,
basic modern necessities, such as access to power and heat, are becoming harder
to come by. These are not the inevitable results of natural phenomena but
failures of governance. For this, residents of these states have no one to
blame but themselves. They voted themselves into this predicament. Fortunately,
they can also vote themselves out of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment