By Michael Brendan Dougherty
Monday, November 11, 2019
Nikki Haley isn’t a Deep Stater. She’s not a saboteur.
She wouldn’t undermine the duly elected president, no siree! That’s the message
that comes along with Haley’s new memoir With All Due Respect. In that
book, she gives the politician’s review of her career so far, shares some
details about her brief Trump-era time serving as U.S. ambassador at the United
Nations, and gives some ideas about her life story.
The juiciest detail is that then–secretary of state Rex
Tillerson and then–White House chief of staff John Kelly approached Haley and
tried to involve her in their intrigues to “save the country” from the
president himself. She tries to explain their rationale. “It was their
decisions, not the president’s, that were in the best interests of America,
they said,” she writes. “The president didn’t know what he was doing. . . .
Tillerson went on to tell me the reason he resisted the president’s decisions
was because, if he didn’t, people would die.”
Haley rebuffed their approach, though she doesn’t say she
reported their insubordinate attitude to the president. “I was always honest
with the president, even when others around him weren’t.”
The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake decodes Haley’s
revelation for esoteric meaning. Yes, Haley is emphasizing that she wasn’t
disloyal to the president, Blake notes. But she’s also confirming that concerns
about Trump’s fitness and the wisdom of his decisions goes “right to the top.”
At The Week, Joel Mathis looks at the political
implications of Haley’s disclosures. In “Nikki Haley Is Plotting a Loopy Path
to the Presidency,” he sees her following a strategy that involves “a careful
balancing act, simultaneously demonstrating her loyalty to Trump and her
independence from him.” This is, Mathis contends, Haley’s way of playing to
Trump’s base while also making it safe for people who don’t like Trump to trust
her.
I think both observations are correct as far as they go.
There is a political calculation at work in Haley’s book and the speeches that
have gone with it. Interestingly, Haley doesn’t highlight her policy
disagreements with Trump so much as her disagreement with his rhetoric and
choice of words. In her book, Haley retells the story of the president’s
reaction to the violence in Charlottesville after the tiki-torch parade. She
said that at the time she felt that the president’s words “had been hurtful and
dangerous.” And so she “picked up the phone and called the president.”
Ultimately, Haley is at pains to emphasize that her
loyalty to the president is also a loyalty to the voters who put him in office.
By respecting the president, even when she disagrees with him or his way of
doing things, she’s respecting the voters she may hope to win someday.
One may find this cynical or savvy on her part. I’m not a
natural Nikki Haley supporter. I haven’t found her speeches all that
impressive. And I tend to be on the opposite side of the intramural
conservative debates about foreign policy. But even if one takes Haley to be
making a calculated political maneuver by demonstrating “her loyalty to Trump and
her independence from him,” we should note that this is precisely the right
thing to do constitutionally. And she knows it. Haley told Norah O’Donnell
during an interview that cabinet officials and bureaucrats have their duties:
“Go tell the president what your differences are and quit if you don’t like
what he’s doing. . . . But to undermine a president is really a very dangerous
thing, and it goes against the Constitution and it goes against what the
American people want. And it was offensive.”
Haley’s recent media tour may be about promoting her book
and her prospects, but she’s doing so by staking her claims on solid
constitutional grounds. The danger Haley refers to is very real. There is no
“American foreign policy” that operates independently from the elected branches
of government or that needs protection from them. Believing so invites our
elected and appointed political class to draw ever further away from the people
they govern, and it threatens the legitimacy of our institutions and elections.
We’ve gotten to this dangerous spot for many reasons.
What Trump critics see as his erratic decision-making, his lack of experience,
and his character are all a larger part of that story. But so too are those
unfaithful servants in the executive branch who have sought to accomplish their
own private agendas and put those ahead of the president’s. So too has Congress
disfigured the presidential office by kicking over so many responsibilities to
the executive branch. But one good thing about Haley’s sudden presence is her
reminder that the presidency is bigger than Trump. And it needs to be in
working order for the succession of people — Democratic, Republican, and others
— who will occupy it in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment