By Jonathan S. Tobin
Monday, September 16, 2019
Earlier this year, many liberals faced up to the problem
of left-wing anti-Semitism. Despite the widespread sympathy generated by the
Women’s March, the group that had organized the first and largest “resistance”
protests against Donald Trump, the Democratic National Committee and other
leading liberal groups and individuals disavowed the organization prior to planned January marches, because its
leadership had become compromised by accusations of anti-Semitism. The March
splintered in two, because its problem with Jews was too important to ignore even
for those who shared its goal of creating one big tent of leftist and liberal
Trump critics.
Nine months later, many on the left seem to have
forgotten the lessons of that moment. Senator Bernie Sanders’s announced last
week that Palestinian-American activist and Women’s March co-chair Linda
Sarsour would be joining his presidential campaign as an official surrogate.
Sanders is in a fierce competition with Senator Elizabeth Warren and other
Democrats for the votes of the party’s left-wing base, which united behind him
in opposition to Hillary Clinton four years ago. So it says something important
about the tone of the nomination battle that Sanders and his team think Sarsour
will help them more than her baggage will hurt them.
Sarsour became a celebrity in the months after Trump’s
election as one of the organizers of the Women’s March, which mobilized the
“resistance” to the new administration even before it took office. The group
gave her a prominent platform, but from the very start of the massive anti-Trump
rallies that launched it on the day after Trump’s inauguration, it was clearly
tainted by anti-Semitism. Some Jewish activists who were initially involved
with the March have spoken about how the group’s leaders marginalized them and
allowed what many had initially thought to be a mainstream movement to be
dominated by radicals, who professed hard-core opposition to Israel’s existence
and openness to being allied with anti-Semites such as the Nation of Islam’s
Louis Farrakhan.
Sarsour was at the center of the controversy over the
group’s anti-Semitic elements, and for good reason. She is an open advocate for
the BDS movement, which is drenched in anti-Semitic invective, and unlike some
of those who flirt with BDS, she isn’t coy about her objectives. She opposes
the existence of a Jewish state no matter where its borders might be drawn and
refers to all of Israeli territory as “occupied.” She has made a habit
of personally attacking Jews who support Israel. And she has made it clear that
pro-Israel women are not welcome in the Women’s March. She has also remained an
ardent defender of other March leaders, such as Tamika Mallory, who are open
fans of anti-Semitic hatemongers such as Farrakhan.
Sarsour and her apologists on the Jewish left claim that
she is misunderstood. They point to gestures such as her fundraising to help
vandalized Jewish cemeteries, even if it is unclear how much, if any, help she
has ever actually given such causes. And they will surely cite her statement supporting
Sanders, which she spoke of her pride in helping elect the first Jewish
president and opposition to anti-Semitism, as further proof of their case. But
her record and stated beliefs can’t be so easily waved away.
The activities and statements of both Mallory and Sarsour
have done much to discredit the Women’s March among liberal Americans who may
disdain Trump but don’t want to be associated with anti-Semites. That’s what
caused the January split in the group’s ranks. So it is significant that Sanders
is willing to bring Sarsour onto his team at a time when he is battling to
overtake both Warren and former vice president Joe Biden with just months to go
before the first votes are cast.
Does Sanders think his Jewish origins make it acceptable
for him to employ someone who not only works for Israel’s destruction but has
also done much to promote anti-Semitic invective? They don’t, and his
trumpeting of Sarsour as a key member of his campaign is historic in a way that
should shock American Jews.
Sanders has at times been among Israel’s most strident
critics in Congress, denouncing its campaign of self-defense against Hamas
terrorists in 2014 and frequently calling for even more “daylight” between the
U.S. and Israel than Barack Obama sought to create. But he has always defended
Israel’s right to exist, criticized Palestinian terrorists, and spoken of his
time as a volunteer on a kibbutz in his youth, which has angered anti-Israel
activists and BDS supporters such as Sarsour. By bringing her aboard his
campaign, he is tossing these voters a bone.
Sarsour’s designation as a Sanders surrogate passed
without a mention in either the Washington Post or the New York Times.
Jewish groups such as the Reform Movement of Judaism were silent about the
alliance between the man who wants to be the first Jewish president and someone
whom even liberals were denouncing for anti-Semitism only a few months ago.
Sanders’ embrace of an anti-Semite such as Sarsour ought to be disqualifying
even for progressives who are worried about the rising tide of anti-Jewish
hate. The fact that it apparently isn’t speaks volumes about the way her views
have become legitimized within the Democratic party.
No comments:
Post a Comment