By Christine Rosen
Wednesday, June 12, 2019
Conservatives are often scolded for making too much of a
fuss about the progressive left’s antics on college campuses and for
complaining excessively about the destructive mob mentality that fuels many
social-justice-warrior campaigns.
But a recent verdict in a lawsuit filed by a family-owned
business in Ohio against Oberlin College reveals that the damage done by campus
protestors and woke university administrators has real-world consequences. It
also offers a glimmer of hope that we have reached a tipping point in the
culture wars on campus.
On November 9, 2016, one day after Donald Trump won the
presidential election, Gibson’s Bakery owner Allyn Gibson, who is white,
witnessed Oberlin student Jonathan Aladin, who is black, shoplifting two
bottles of wine from the store. (Aladin, who was underage, had evidently
planned to buy an additional bottle of wine using a fake I.D. but ended up
stealing instead).
When Gibson stopped the shoplifter to retrieve the stolen
items and call police, the thief attacked him, threw the bottles of wine, and
fled the store. Gibson followed him and was attacked further by Aladin and two
female friends (also black). As the police incident report reveals, when police
arrived, they found Gibson on his back on the ground being kicked and punched
by Aladin and the two female accomplices. Gibson told police that Aladin had
threatened to kill him during the attack.
In a rational world, this would have been handled as a
simple robbery and assault arrest. The facts of the incident were not in doubt,
and many witnesses corroborated Gibson’s account.
But this is Oberlin, a campus that has become a
caricature of political correctness. It is the place where students protested
the school’s food-service providers because of a poorly-executed Banh Mi
sandwich (there were also complaints about inauthentic sushi and General Tso’s
chicken.) Students declared this an
intolerable form of cultural appropriation, and school administrators quickly
caved to their demands for more ethnically sensitive cuisine, setting up a
meeting where students could air their grievances about the cafeteria menu and
telling the school newspaper, “It’s important to us that students feel
comfortable when they are here.”
The problem is that they are too comfortable—so comfortable
in the knowledge that their feelings and ideological beliefs will be catered to
that facts are no longer relevant to any discussion or debate on campus. In the
case of Gibson’s, a simple shoplifting incident prompted the Black Student
Union, College Democrats, and the student senate to launch a protest and
boycott outside the store; the student senate even issued a resolution calling
for an end to all financial support for Gibson’s Bakery by anyone at the
university.
At the protest, students hurled expletives at customers,
entered the store, and waved signs saying, “End Racial Profiling.” And not only
students; Oberlin’s dean of students, Meredith Raimondo, attended the protest
and passed out leaflets that read, in part: “This is a RACIST establishment
with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION.”
The school did briefly stop doing business with Gibson’s,
offering an unusual reason for doing so in a statement it issued two days after
the incident: Donald Trump. “This has been a difficult few days for our
community, not simply because of the events at Gibson’s Bakery, but because of
the fears and concerns that many are feeling in response to the outcome of the
presidential election,” the statement from Oberlin president Marvin Krislov and
Raimondo said. “We write foremost to acknowledge the pain and sadness that many
of you are experiencing.”
As for the actual physical pain experienced by Gibson at
the hands of Aladin and his accomplices, the school was silent. Students and
administrators who protested the store assumed that because the shoplifters
happened to be black, the white business owner’s intention in preventing them
from stealing must have been racist.
The claims that the store had a “long account” of
racially profiling black customers was also repeatedly made without any
evidence (a police investigation later revealed that in the past five years,
only 6 of the 40 people arrested for shoplifting at Gibson’s were black.) As a
long-time Gibson’s employee (who happens to be black) told the student
newspaper, “If you’re caught shoplifting, you’re going to end up getting
arrested. . . When you steal from the store, it doesn’t matter what color you
are. You can be purple, blue, green, if you steal, you get caught, you get
arrested.”
The fact that Gibson’s had been serving the community for
more than 100 years meant nothing. Nor did the fact that it was Aladin, not
Gibson, who broke the law. As the Weekly
Standard reported, Oberlin officials even suggested to local businesses
that if students were caught shoplifting in the future, the school should be
called, not the police, so that the thieves could be given one free pass for
their actions.
According to the Legal Insurrection blog, which has
followed the case since the beginning, all three of the assailants eventually
“would plead guilty to shoplifting and aggravated trespassing, and would avow
that Gibson’s was not engaged in racial profiling.” None served any time in
jail. Even that non-punishment was too much for Oberlin’s
administrator-activists. As Legal Insurrection noted, when news broke that
Aladin and his accomplices would receive only probation, “Toni Myers, Oberlin
College’s Multicultural Resource Center Director then, send [sic] out a text
which said, ‘After a year, I hope we rain fire and brimstone on that store.’”
In 2017, after taking a significant hit to their profits
because of the protests, Gibson’s decided to hold Oberlin and its officials
accountable for their kowtowing to student protestors. The bakery filed a civil
lawsuit against the school (including Raimondo) for “libel, slander,
interference with business relationships, interference with contracts,
deceptive trade practices, infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring
and trespass.” This week, a jury agreed with the bakery’s claim that the school
and its officials had acted irresponsibly and awarded Gibson’s $11 million in
damages (if you’re concerned about runaway tort judgments, this might seem like
a disturbingly high number for a small bakery, but considering that Oberlin
claimed Gibson’s was worth less than $35,000, it’s not surprising the jury
responded with a large damage verdict).
During the trial, Gibson’s lawyer argued, “When a
powerful institution says you’re racist, you’re doomed.” As anyone who has
witnessed the mob mentality among campus progressive activists can attest,
student mobs only thrive because administrators allow them to do so. With their
courtroom victory in Ohio this week, the Gibson family put college officials
across the country on notice that people unfairly victimized and libeled by
campus activists are done acquiescing to the mob’s demands.
No comments:
Post a Comment