By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, June 26, 2019
Given the recent fight over whether U.S.
refugee-detention centers are in fact “concentration camps,” the Trump
administration might want to borrow a page from the Chinese and simply call
them “vocational skills education training centers.” That way, no one would
really care at all.
That’s what the Chinese call their gulag archipelago of
internment and reeducation camps in Xinjiang province, where an estimated
million ethnic Uighurs and other Turkic people are being held. The Uighurs are
a traditionally Muslim minority, and Beijing says they pose a major threat
because of Islamic terrorism. The reality is that the Chinese fear separatist
movements, Islamic or otherwise, in a resource-rich region three times the size
of France.
As a result, the Chinese are pursuing the largest attempt
at cultural annihilation of the 21st century. Religion is heavily regulated
throughout China, but it is brutally policed in Xinjiang. According to an
analysis of satellite imagery by Agence France-Presse, “30 religious sites were
completely demolished while six had their domes and corner spires removed.”
Ancient cemeteries are being erased, turned into parking lots. In the southern
city of Kashgar, once a jewel of the Silk Road — and closer to Baghdad than to
Beijing — morning calls to prayer have been silenced.
The evil deeds in Xinjiang are merely the most egregious
examples of what The Economist has called “apartheid with Chinese
characteristics” and what I think of as a high-tech Asian version of Jim Crow.
What is both intriguing and infuriating to me is that
American politicians refuse to talk about any of this. After all, we are in the
midst of a trade war with China. Whatever the merits of this economic
confrontation may or may not be, you would think the nature of the Chinese
regime itself would play a larger part in debate. The nature of the South
African regime was the entire reason for the sanctions and boycotts pushed by
progressives and Democrats in the 1980s. The nature of the Soviet Union was the
rhetorical centerpiece of the economic warfare pushed by Republicans during the
Cold War. Today, the repression of the mullahs and the export of terrorism
aren’t the main driver of sanctions against Iran — that would be the country’s
nuclear program — but they are a major part of the rhetoric accompanying such
policies.
But among both Democrats and Republicans, Chinese
authoritarianism often goes unmentioned, save perhaps as an afterthought.
Countless conservatives, particularly of the new nationalist bent, want to take
a hard line with China because they make widgets at a lower price than us or
because they rip off Hollywood. The fact that the Chinese government has put a
million Muslims in reeducation camps and persecuted Christians, too, is rarely
part of the conversation.
Rhetorically, President Trump has been far harsher on
Canada and Mexico than he has been on China. He refused to offer even pro forma
support for the protesters in Hong Kong beyond saying the protests were having
a “big impact.”
One needn’t be blindly moralistic about all of this.
China is big, powerful, and dangerous. But so was the Soviet Union, and we
still managed to tell the truth about it. China is also more integrated into
the global economy than the USSR ever was, and that brings important considerations
as well.
The ongoing confrontation with China highlights the moral
blind spot of economic nationalism — on the right and the left. The new fad of
nationalism on the right has brought many conservatives into agreement with the
left on non-interventionism and realism. The Trump administration as well as
Democratic supporters of a tough trade policy with China (such as Senator Chuck
Schumer) have made it clear that all we expect of Beijing is more cooperation
on trade, intellectual-property, and currency policies. Fix that stuff, our
messaging signals, and everything you do to your own people is your business.
President Trump’s speech in Normandy earlier this month
was rightly hailed as one of his best. It was particularly popular among the
nationalists because World War II understandably looms large in the romance
about American moral and military might. Trump hailed the veterans of D-Day who
“threw open the gates of Nazi concentration camps to liberate Jews.” Meanwhile,
today’s nationalists are happy to demonize a China that bootlegs Mickey Mouse
but are silent about the very same China that rounds up internal enemies and
puts them in concentration camps.
No comments:
Post a Comment