By Jonah Goldberg
Friday, April 19, 2019
One of the things I tell new parents is something that
was told to me when my daughter still had that new-baby smell: “Prepare for
long days but short years.” No statement more succinctly captures the
exhaustion, excitement, and melancholy nostalgia that come with parenthood. I
have no doubt whole books have not covered it more eloquently.
This week I had a similar sensation thinking about the
two big news stories of the week: The fire at Notre Dame and the release of the
Mueller report.
Time may be linear, but our comprehension of it isn’t. All
around us events are taking place that we do not perceive as events because
they are moving at a pace that we really can’t comprehend. Imagine if you could
make a film of the planet earth from its birth to its demise. If you played the
movie fast enough, the formation of mountains would look like terrifying
clashes between continents. The breakup of Pangaea might look like a jigsaw
puzzle thrown into a hot tub. Playing the film a million times slower would
still probably make the rise and fall of ancient redwoods seem like nothing
more than the instantaneous and momentary emergence of some colors on a
canvass. Think of it this way: If you reduced the entire history of the planet
to a 24-hour cycle, humans don’t even show up — some 2 million years ago — less
than one minute before midnight.
Against such a backdrop, the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de
Paris emerges and disappears too fast for the naked eye. As for the
controversies about Donald Trump, never mind the Mueller report, they take up a
fraction of time words cannot capture.
But if you slow things down enough for the mind to take
it in, Notre Dame is like a mountain. Not quite eternal in a literal sense, but
eternal enough by human standards. As I mentioned the other day, I once wrote
and produced a documentary called Notre
Dame: Witness to History (I don’t really recommend it; I wasn’t a great TV
producer and I certainly didn’t have a great budget). The title was clichéd but
accurate. Notre Dame was the central location for so much of French and really
Western history, its scars and embellishments are almost like rings in an
ancient tree recording whole eras of Western history. Signs of the Huguenots’
assault on the Church — and the Church’s assault on the Huguenots — can be
found in its nooks and crannies like the tiny indicia of a plague of locusts in
a bisection of an ancient oak. The last time the Spire burned, it was at the hands
of the Jacobins who briefly turned Notre Dame into a “Temple of Reason.”
Putting History on
a Stop Watch
I bring all this up for a few reasons, not least because
the “process” for this “news”letter amounts to taking my brain pan and upending
it like a kid emptying his toy chest in search of the Lego pieces required to
build a time machine. The controversies of the day are important, but they are
like the crises of parenthood: Hugely important in the moment, but likely to
turn into the faintest squiggles in the tree rings of time. That’s not
foreordained, of course. There are daily crises with your kids that can turn
into existential ones — as anyone who’s taken their child to an emergency room
can attest — which is one of the reasons the days of parenthood can feel so
much longer than the years.
I’m not sure what the right terms are, but there’s an
analogy here. Some controversies are important (and some are just incredibly
stupid) but they are important in the moment alone. Others transcend the fierce
urgency of now and apply across generations. For some, climate change is
precisely such a challenge. For others, it is the civilizational friction between
the Muslim world and the rest, or the rivalries between America and China. The
Cold War was certainly larger than any confirmation battle or scandal.
The most worthwhile daily arguments are the ones that
work within a timeline measured by more than 15-minute increments in a Nielsen
report on last night’s cable ratings. For instance, Jussie Smollett’s transgressions
are great for feeding the ratings beast, but they are only significant to the
extent they illuminate the larger dysfunction of a culture that encourages
racial hoaxes because we have turned victims into heroes. And even then, that
context is usually used as a pretext just to keep jaw-jawing and preening for
the perpetual outrage machine.
I’m the first to admit that it is hard to know where to
draw the lines between seriousness and exploitation, or mere infotainment,
particularly since this “news”letter darts back and forth across the borders
like the Viet Cong running the Ho Chi Minh trail. But one of the things I
despise about the current moment is how the Big Things are so often turned into
just another Twitter controversy and the Small Things are elevated into
existential crises of the first order.
President Trump, lacking anything like a historical
memory, is fond of claiming that this or that outrage or accomplishment is the
worst or best thing “ever.” “Our African American communities are absolutely in
the worst shape they’ve ever been in before,” Trump declared in 2016. “Ever,
ever, ever.” That might have been news to the Africans-Americans lynched in the
1920s or the Africans auctioned off in Charleston in the 1820s. I still laugh
whenever I think about Sebastian Gorka ranting about the alleged FISA warrant
abuses of the Obama administration. “It has to be put in the context of the history
of our great nation,” he said in expert-mode. “This is 100 times bigger.” More
recently he explained that the Democrats were a continuation of Stalinism
because they’re coming for our hamburgers.
Western
Civilization 0, Twitter 1
The other day Ben Shapiro offered what should have been
an utterly banal statement about the fire at Notre Dame:
Absolutely heartbreaking. A
magnificent monument to Western civilization collapsing.
Now, I have no problem with quibbles (and neither does
Ben) from Catholics who point out that Notre Dame was a monument to the glory
of God and what Catholics believe to be the One True Church as delineated in
the Nicene Creed. But, I doubt any of those Catholics took offense at what Ben
said. And if they did, they should probably lighten up. I’d also point out that
Cathedrals were the space programs of their day (“The Knights Templar were the
first Space Force”: Discuss). Cities and nations constantly competed to see who
could build the tallest Cathedral — which is why most are built on the tallest
ground available. The idea was both theological and political. Theologically,
the idea was to get as close to God as possible. Politically, it was a desire
for, well, national greatness.
Anyway, what I have a huge problem with is the bonfire of
asininity that ignited from people who think “Western civilization” is a term
reserved solely for the alt-right and other bigots (David French addressed the
point well here).
In a piece about Ben’s excellent book on Western civilization — I’ll reserve my
quibbles for later — The Economist
labeled him an “alt-right sage” and a “pop idol of the alt right.” To The Economist’s credit, they retracted
and apologized. But the immediate assumption that praise for, or pride in,
Western civilization is a species of bigotry and racism is a perfect example of
the sort of civilizational suicide I describe in my own book on the subject.
So adamantine is this absurdity that some Shapiro haters
actually assume he’s not actually saying he thinks the West is superior, only
“tacitly” suggesting it.
I wasn't tacitly saying Western
civilization is superior to other civilizations. I openly say it, because I
believe Western civilization is superior to other civilizations. In fact, I wrote
an entire book on the topic, in which I explain why.
https://www.amazon.com/Right-Side-History-Reason-Purpose/dp/0062857908
Ben might as well be standing in the center of Times
Square waving a giant foam finger that reads “Western Civ #1” on it. But the
idea is so offensive to some people they think he wouldn’t dare say it
outright.
What’s So Great
about Western Civilization?
I’ve covered much of this at length — book length but
also in this G-File — elsewhere. So I’ll go in a slightly different direction.
Forget calling it Western civilization for a moment.
Instead think of a kind of party platform with a bunch of planks:
• Support for human rights
• Belief in the rule of law
• Dedication to democracy
• Free speech
• Freedom of conscience
• Admiration for science and the scientific method
• Curiosity about other cultures
• Property rights
• Tolerance or celebration of technological and/or cultural
innovation
I’ll be generous and stipulate that 90 percent of the
people who are offended by pride in Western civilization actually believe — or
think they believe — in most or all of these things. They just have a problem
connecting the dots, so I’ll try.
Where do they think most of these ideas come from? Where
were they most successfully put into action? What civilization today or in some
bygone era manifests these values more? Chinese civilization? Islamic
civilization? Aztec? African? Indian? Persian? Turkish?
I’m not trying to belittle any of those cultures, nor
deny their contributions to human history. I’m not even trying to argue – here,
at least — that Western civilization is objectively superior in some scientific
or God’s-eye-view sense. As with the debates over nationalism, there’s no
arguing — and no reason to argue — with a French patriot about whether or not
America is “better” than France. I would think less of a Spaniard who didn’t
love Spain more than he or she loves France. It’s like arguing whose family is
better, we love what is ours. As Bill Buckley liked to say, De gustibus non est disputandum.
But the weird thing is that many of the people who are
outraged by benign nationalism or the benign pan-nationalism that is pride in
Western civilization take no umbrage when someone from Iran or China says they
think their civilization is best. This
of course is a manifestation of the ancient cult of identitarianism, which the
best traditions of the West have battled internally at great cost for thousands
of years. Saying Western civilization is great hurts the feelings of some
people invested in some other source of identity. And it hurts the feelings of
some Westerners because they think it’s a sign of enlightenment to get offended
on other people’s behalf or to denigrate the society that gave them their soap
box.
The irony is that the willingness to entertain the
possibility that some other culture has something important to offer or say to
us is actually one of the hallmarks of Western civilization (and the
condescension with which many Americans treat other cultures is also a more
regrettable side of Western culture). We “borrow” stuff from other cultures
constantly, starting with Christianity itself.
This is particularly true of America, which is why our
menus read like the requested meal plans from a meeting of the U.N. General
Assembly. This profound lack of self-awareness manifests itself most acutely
among progressives who wear their Europe-envy on their sleeves. Oh, they’re so
much more civilized over there. Well,
what civilization do you think “over there” is part of?
Western civilization is a work in progress because that’s
what civilization means. If you want
a Cliff’s Notes version of what my book was about it’s simply this: Every
generation, humans start from scratch. As Hannah Arendt said, every generation
Western civilization is invaded by barbarians — we call them “children.” As
babies we come into the world with the same programming as Viking, Hun or
caveman babies. These barbarians need to be civilized
and that’s a job primarily done by families, which is why the days are long and
the years are short. We teach barbarians how to be citizens in the broadest
sense of the word, through formal education, religious teaching, social norms
and the modeling of proper behavior. In other words, we assimilate people into
a culture.
As Alan Wolfe writes in his discussion of Immanuel Kant:
As cultivating a field yields a
better product, the arts and sciences cultivate us by improving the quality of
who we are. No wonder, then, that when we look for a term that expresses the way
we improve upon nature, we use “culture,” which has the same root as
“cultivate.” And civilization—expressed in German not only as Zivilisation but also as Kultur — far from corrupting our soul,
makes it possible for us to bring good out of evil.
The way you sustain and improve upon a culture is by
fostering a sense of gratitude for what is best about it. You celebrate the
good in your story while putting the bad in the correct context. Conservatism
is gratitude, and as I noted on Fox the other night, one of the most compelling
things in reaction the fire of Notre Dame was seeing how many people recognized
their own ingratitude for this jewel of their own civilization. The Church was
in peril because the French took it for granted. But, like that feeling one
gets deep in the soul when a loved one in peril, millions were overcome with a
sense of what they might lose. And now France is devoting itself to restoring
what was almost lost.
Has Western civilization made mistakes? Sure (cue the
Monty Python skit about Rome). Terrible things have been done in its name, a
statement one can make about every civilization that has ever existed. But to
say that the mistakes define us more than the accomplishments is suicidally
stupid. And if you subscribe to those planks I mentioned above, I’d like to
suggest that telling people they’re bigots for taking pride in the civilization
that brought them forth better than any other is like taking a sledgehammer to
the soapbox you’re standing on.
And to do it in the name of virtue tweeting is one of the
purer forms of asininity.
No comments:
Post a Comment