By Ben Shapiro
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
On Saturday, Trump press secretary Sean Spicer created a
media firestorm by fibbing about sizes of inauguration crowds. After calling a
press conference to claim that Trump’s inauguration had the largest audience in
history, both “in person and around the globe,” Spicer tore into the media for
their supposed falsehoods; Spicer specifically referenced D.C. Metro figures,
fencing and magnetometer placement, and floor coverings that highlighted empty
spaces on the National Mall. None of his claims were true.
NBC’s Chuck Todd asked Trump top adviser Kellyanne Conway
about Spicer’s routine. “I’m curious,” he said, “why President Trump chose
yesterday to send out his press secretary to essentially litigate a provable
falsehood when it comes to a small and petty thing like inaugural crowd size. I
guess my question to you is, Why do that?” Conway futzed about for an answer,
variously misdirecting to the press’s willingness to ignore President Obama’s
widespread lies, Trump’s executive actions, and a New York Times reporter’s quickly retracted tweet about a bust of
Martin Luther King Jr. being removed from the Oval Office.
Todd’s question is the right one: What would drive
President Trump to spend mental energy on a question as silly and meaningless
as inaugural crowd size? There are dozens of excellent reasons his crowd size
didn’t match Obama’s; the best reason is that the inauguration takes place in a
Democratic stronghold, Washington, D.C. (Trump won 4.1 percent of the vote
there.) Nonetheless, Trump chose to glom on to media coverage of crowd size.
Why bother?
But Todd’s question wasn’t that of the media at large.
Their question quickly turned from one of presidential focus and temperament to
a far more self-centered one: Why would Trump send out his press secretary to
lie to them? Why would Trump want to
establish such an adversarial relationship with
the press? Why would Spicer attack the
media?
That personal umbrage from the media drove the coverage
throughout the weekend. On CNN with Brian Stelter, former Hillary Clinton press
secretary Brian Fallon called Spicer’s comments “an affront to anybody who is
on our side of the wall and works in this business.” CBS’s Major Garrett
complained, “I’ve never seen anything like this, where it was so intense, so
harsh and passionate right off the beginning.”
This is why Trump wins every time he attacks the media:
because the media are so consumed with themselves, they don’t seem to care
about the public interest. When Spicer returned to the podium on Monday, he
gave the first question to the New York
Post rather than the Associated Press. This sent the collective media into
spasms of apoplexy — how dare Spicer
violate protocol this way? Why did he give questions to the Christian
Broadcasting Network before CNN?
Then, finally, when the more Trump-unfriendly press did get a shot at Spicer, they made the
entire crowd-size debacle into a firefight over media relations. “Before I get
to a policy question, just a question about the nature of your job,” said Jon
Karl of ABC News. “Is it your intention to always tell the truth from that
podium, and will you pledge never to knowingly say something that is not
factual?”
This is the way Team Trump wants to portray the media: as completely obsessed with their own
mistreatment at Trump’s hands rather than with mistreatment of the truth and,
by extension, of the American people. By dividing the media from the American
people, Team Trump conquers.
The media have been complicit in their own demise for
years. For nearly a decade, they swallowed lie after lie from the Obama
administration. Why? Didn’t they have an obligation to ask Jay Carney the same
question Karl asked Spicer, particularly after Carney was trotted out day after
day to claim that Americans could keep their doctors under Obamacare? Why
didn’t the media take personal umbrage
when Barack Obama fibbed about Benghazi or about the IRS? Why did they seem
wildly untroubled when Obama national-security adviser Ben Rhodes peddled
absolute fiction about the Iran nuclear deal — and then bragged about it?
Because they agreed with Obama. So they weren’t
affronted. After all, Obama wasn’t really lying to them — he was merely lying to the American people! And was that so
bad? The American people didn’t know enough to understand the complexities of
Obamacare or the foreign-policy rationale behind the Iran deal or the details
of the Benghazi attack. If Obama fibbed, the media glossed over those fibs —
they weren’t upset on behalf of Americans, because they weren’t upset in
general.
Now, in the age of Trump, nothing has changed with
respect to the veracity and credibility of the president’s press secretary. The
media are angry that they’re being treated as the enemy rather than as the
representatives of truth. But they handed over that title years ago.
How can they restore their credibility? By treating
personal slights as immaterial, and lies as slights to Americans, rather than
vice versa. Who cares who gets to ask the first question at a press conference?
Is it really important to a truck driver from Michigan whether Jim Acosta at
CNN is upset because Trump called him “fake news” wrongly? Or is it more
important that Trump lied to the American people when he said he would turn
over his IRS records?
In the end, Trump can fib about crowd size, and few
people will care. They see the issue as just another food fight between Trump
and his media antagonists. If the media want to police honesty in the Trump
administration, they’ll have to assess themselves honestly first: Are they
interested in a story because it affects them, or because it affects the
American people?
No comments:
Post a Comment