Friday, April 17, 2015
When even the New York Times starts writing about
anti-Semitism on college campuses on its front pages, it’s time to sit up and
take notice. Following in the wake of a story last month about a Jewish student
at UCLA who was quizzed about her views as a Jew in an interview for a student
government position, the latest New York Times report concerns a Stanford
student who alleges that a coalition of progressives were concerned about her
attitude toward divestment because she was Jewish.
Fortunately, we have not seen an outbreak of violence in
the United States as we have in Europe. Nevertheless, the anti-Semitic acts on
college campuses are alarming. No one should be surprised, however, given the
nationwide campaign to delegitimize Israel by calling on universities to
boycott and divest from the Jewish state. The Israel deniers behind these
efforts have made clear they do not believe Israel has a right to exist and
have cast Jewish students as defenders of Nazi-like abusers of Palestinian
rights.
The degree to which some students have been cowed is
typified by that same Stanford student who, before being interviewed about her
views on divestment and other matters, had already scrubbed her Facebook page
of any references to Israel out of fear they would be held against her. As she
found out, however, being a Jew was enough for her integrity to be questioned.
We cannot blame Jewish students on campus for being
intimidated. They often find themselves fighting alone for respect for their religion,
their opinions, and the Jewish homeland. Peers whom they expect to be natural
allies in defending democracy, opposing terrorism, and seeking peace have
turned on them with a vengeance.
Hillel and Chabad cannot counter this onslaught. Not
because they are indifferent but because they are afraid of jeopardizing their
broader missions. In the case of Hillel, the goal is to attract and engage
students to have meaningful Jewish experiences. Chabad’s objective is to
educate Jewish students about their religious heritage and inculcate a deeper
religious identity. Neither organization is equipped to handle significant
controversy. They fear that that standing up boldly for Israel will politicize their
missions and alienate a substantial number of students.
At a time when Israel is under attack on a daily basis,
and Jewish students bear the brunt of the opprobrium directed at their
homeland, we cannot afford to be timid. What we need are Campus Maccabees who
will not shrink from controversy and are prepared to stand tall and proud in
defense of Israel. No that is not right. They should not limit themselves to
defense, they must also go on offense, calling out the anti-Semitism among
peers and professors.
Taking on faculty takes guts, given the fear most
students have that their professors can sabotage their future if they dare to
challenge them. But it is in the classroom where the most serious problems
exist. Professors across the country, including those teaching courses having
nothing to do with the Middle East, exploit their positions of power to advance
personal agendas that demonize Israel and misinform students. Nearly 2,000
professors have signed petitions calling for their universities to boycott
Israeli universities, divest from companies doing business with Israel and/or
condemning Israel beyond the bounds of legitimate criticism. These same people
then cry McCarthyism when anyone dares to criticize their views.
These same academics use IPhones and IMacs, even though
they are manufactured in China, which has occupied Tibet since 1950. Likewise,
they make no calls for boycotts against Turkey, in occupation of Cypress since
1974, or against Russia for occupying Crimea. And this is aside from the fact
that Israel’s “occupation” of Judea and Samaria can in no way be compared to
these other scenarios seeing as Israel conquered the West Bank in a defensive
war thrust upon it and has tried numerous times to come to a peace agreement
with the Palestinians by ceding territory only to see thousands of its
civilians blown to smithereens. As of this writing, 97% of all Palestinians in
the West Bank live under Palestinian Authority control, a fact that cannot be
said of Tibetans who live under Chinese oppression.
Meanwhile, university administrations hide behind
“academic freedom,” the veil they have created to justify their refusal to
police the academic malpractice taking place within their ivory towers. Their
idea of what constitutes freedom of expression, however, is selective. They
would not countenance criticism or slurs directed at women or minorities but
they defend anti-Israel activities, such as the boycott, divestment, sanctions
(BDS) campaign, that are affronts to Jews and, as Harvard President Larry
Summers put it, are “anti-Semitic in their effect, if not their intent.”
Yesterday I received a call from Washington Square News,
NYU’s student newspaper, asking me to comment on a petition signed by 130 New
York University Professors calling on the University to divest from companies
doing business with Israel. I was also asked to respond to their charges that
Israel is like apartheid South Africa. They quoted me as responding, “Any
professor who calls Israel an apartheid state is guilty of ignorance, moral
blindness, and an assault on the sacred memory of Nelson Mandela, who they are
of necessity comparing to Yasser Arafat. Mandela was a man of peace who brought
together people of different races in harmony and equality. Arafat is the
father of modern international terrorism. Hamas is dedicated in their charter
to the genocide of Jewish people wherever they may be found.”
For too long American Jews have made unity a priority
over survival. Now, hardly a day passes by when there isn’t a fresh outrage
against Israel at American Universities.Campus organizations continue to make
this mistake. Some Israeli policies are controversial, and taking a position
will upset many students, which is exactly what organizations want to avoid.
This is why we need Campus Maccabees who will fight for what is right, not just
what is popular, who will embrace rather than shrink from controversy, and who
will not tolerate anti-Semitism in any form whatsoever on their campuses.
No comments:
Post a Comment