By Austin Bay
Wednesday, April 02, 2014
No one died on March 31st when first North Korean and
then retaliating South Korean artillery units fired some 800 rockets and shells
into disputed boundary waters along the peninsula's western coast.
The absence of human fatalities is welcome news. So is
the South's tit-for-tat firepower display.
For the last two years South Korean leaders have been
telling the current northern dynast, Kim Jong Un, that South Korea will no
longer bleed and bear it.
Economic aid now depends on demonstrated North Korean
good behavior. Violent provocations by North Korea, whether at sea, on land or
in the air, will draw forceful and convincingly violent southern responses.
Tube artillery rounds that are 155 mm are not the most
refined of diplomatic instruments; like B-52s and aircraft carriers, they are
concrete hard power. However, Seoul's tailored retaliation mirrored Pyongyang's
provocation with diplomatic deftness. The northerners fired 500 rocket rounds
and artillery shells around and below the Northern Limit Line. Below the line
lies territory claimed by Seoul. In turn, southern gunners in the Republic of
Korea Army pumped 300 shells into the sea zone.
Geysers galore. Not one round, fired by either side, hit
land.
The lack of fatalities likely links to Seoul's policy of
swift retaliation. South Korean officials reported that the sea-border shootout
began with a naval coordination "hot line" phone call from the north.
Pyongyang informed Seoul that northern artillery units would conduct a
live-fire exercise along the NLL (a line the north does not recognize).
The phone call gave South Koreans living on two islands
in the area, Yeonpyeong and Baeknyeong, time to take shelter in bunkers. The
South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo quoted Seoul sources as saying that the
North provided the unprecedented warning because civilians casualties might
draw international political condemnation.
Perhaps. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon is South
Korean and he certainly commands an international audience. However, concern
for dead South Korean civilians has never deterred past North Korean
belligerence. Not so long ago North Korean propagandists thought photos of dead
South Koreans sent precisely the right message.
Two North Korean attacks that drew South Korean blood
occurred in 2010 in the NLL maritime zone. Both figure prominently in South
Korea's decision to retaliate with force. In November 2010 northern artillery
fire killed four South Koreans on the island of Yeonpyeong. One volley smashed
a supermarket. The Yeonpyeong slaughter incensed South Koreans already angered
by the March 2010 sinking of the South Korean Navy corvette, Cheonan.
Investigators concluded a North Korean torpedo sank the ship. Forty-six southern
sailors, most of them quite young, died in that sneak attack.
The two 2010 attacks shocked millennial-generation South
Koreans who had decided North Korean threats of nuclear immolation were just
theatrics.
The attacks told South Korea's twenty-somethings that the
Korean War is their war. The 1953 armistice is not a peace treaty; it is a
ceasefire arrangement. When a U.N. team drew the NLL, North Korea immediately
rejected it. The line went on the map, anyway, with the idea that a peace
treaty would demarcate a final boundary. Sixty-one years later there is no
peace. In March 2013, North Korean thirty-something Kim Jong Un revoked the
armistice.
South Korea has won the cultural, social and economic
dimensions of the Korean War. Only the military dimension, to include North
Korea's pursuit of nukes and ICBM's, remains in dispute. Japan is re-arming.
The South Korean military is a potent, modern force armed with reliable tanks
and high-performance aircraft. Though North Korea has more artillery pieces and
more planes, much of its material is antiquated and woefully maintained.
Civilian satellite photos show airfields lined with decrepit MiG's that last
flew in 1965.
This week South Korean retaliatory fire put holes in
water. North Korean nuclear facilities are hardened targets -- but rest assured
they, too, now risk South Korean retaliation.
No comments:
Post a Comment