By Noah Rothman
Wednesday, December 06, 2023
What may be the final debate of the Republican primary
cycle — indeed, possibly the final debate of the 2024 election cycle —
generated more heat than light on Wednesday night. Voters were presented with a
Rorschach test. Each candidate hit their notes and met expectations, so voters
who watched the debate probably saw exactly what they wanted to see — whatever
that meant to them.
Voters who like Ron DeSantis saw him at his best. For the
first time in this cycle, DeSantis ran like he was behind in the polls — a
prudent calculation, because he very much is. DeSantis didn’t sit back, absorb
blows, and stick to his message. Instead, he picked fights, with Nikki Haley in
particular, some of which he won. He hammered his closest competitor on
transgenderism and the need to prohibit in law access to surgical or
pharmaceutical remedies for gender dysphoria in minors. He backed a muscular foreign
policy, exhibited his encyclopedic knowledge of policy, and promised
convincingly to be a reformer rather than a caretaker in the Oval Office. It
was DeSantis’s best primary-debate performance by far.
If you aren’t inclined toward DeSantis, you had plenty to
chew on, too. Chris Christie dissected him with the surgical acumen he once
applied to Marco Rubio, savaging the governor for being evasive — a charge
DeSantis confirmed with his habitual evasions. The Florida governor lent
credence to vaccine skepticism, attacked American law-enforcement agencies for
prosecuting “one of the biggest abuses of power in our history,” and refused to
be pinned down on his commitment to Taiwan’s defense. Even DeSantis’s source of
presidential inspiration, Calvin Coolidge, sounded insincere. That nod to the
principle of radically limited constitutional government was welcome, but
Coolidge’s aversion to the application of state power as a remedy for political
controversies or even natural disasters does not bear even a passing
resemblance to DeSantis’s record in Florida. That inauthenticity contributed to
a conclusion you’ve likely already drawn about the governor.
If you like Nikki Haley, you were probably satisfied with
her performance. She drew an inordinate amount of fire from her fellow
candidates on the debate stage, which only confirmed her status as the new
front-runner in the race for second place. Haley navigated her way out of
thorny attacks on her record and views, and she exhibited all the depth of
understanding of foreign-policy issues she has showcased throughout the 2024
primaries. Ramaswamy’s gratuitous attacks on her as “a fascist neocon” who will
“send your kids to die so that she can buy a bigger house” probably only made
you more sympathetic toward the former South Carolina governor. In short, you
didn’t see anything to make you rethink your vote.
If you’re a Haley skeptic, your worst suspicions were
confirmed. Haley wilted under DeSantis’s interrogation about her views on
therapeutic and pharmaceutical remedies for transgenderism in minors, and she
disappeared for much of the debate under that pressure. Haley’s attempt to
clean up her support for controls on anonymous social-media accounts was
unconvincing, and her wonky approach to remedying the problems associated with
inflation and illegal immigration probably sounded more like dissimulation than
a comprehensible set of policy preferences.
For the handful of Republican-primary voters who back
Chris Christie, they saw the unvarnished wrecking ball they have come to depend
upon to be the skunk at the garden party. He stripped the varnish off DeSantis
and Ramaswamy, he shivved Haley for dancing around Trump’s dominance in the
race, and he said everything about Donald Trump that Republicans hate to hear.
Of course, if you don’t like Christie, you don’t like him for all the qualities
he exhibited tonight.
Vivek Ramaswamy fans were probably delighted by his
willingness to tap-dance across live wires. He leaned into the noxious-boor
persona he has cultivated in this race, accusing everyone in his general
vicinity of corruption. He endorsed “great replacement theory,” which maintains
that lawmakers are seeking to dilute the political power of native-born
Americans by importing pliant migrants. He endorsed the idea that both the 2020
and 2016 elections were somehow stolen from Donald Trump. He took aim at the mid-pandemic
vaccine-development program and promised to repeal the liability protections
that have made American medical-device manufacturing and pharmaceutical
development one of the nation’s highest-performing economic sectors. Of course,
if those qualities attract you to his candidacy, you’re in a blessedly small
minority within the GOP.
And then there’s Trump. The former president took it on
the chin in absentia more than in any previous debate. DeSantis attacked Trump
directly (when prompted) over his advanced age and obliquely over his failure
to build the wall and have Mexico pay for it. Haley attacked Trump for ignoring
China’s campaign of exporting fentanyl precursors to America and its
importation of U.S. technology, which Beijing uses in military applications,
and for the deficit spending that occurred under his administration. For perhaps
the first time this cycle, Christie was not alone in taking the fight to Trump.
There is an assumption abroad that Trump’s support among Republicans is
unassailable, but it’s an assumption that his most viable competitors have not
tested. Tonight, they did.
All this is to say that tonight was a
choose-your-own-adventure debate. There were no clear victors and no obvious
losers. For the most part, everyone stayed in their lanes. The rest of the
story will be left to the voters to tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment