By Noah Rothman
Wednesday, August 23, 2023
As is his tendency, Dominic Pino has written a stellar, comprehensive, and
all but irrefutable critique of the barstool geopolitics the Heritage
Foundation retails as analysis of Russia’s war in Ukraine and America’s support
for Kyiv’s continued sovereignty. Indeed, what Pino has brought to bear is
apparently so irrefutable that his critics have been reduced to pointing and
laughing in lieu of positing a cogent counterargument.
To wit:
I guess we’re all supposed to just intuit why this
sentence marks its author as somehow morally compromised or intellectually
deficient, but I must confess I lack the requisite earthiness to understand the
offense Pino has caused here. He is correct: Most of America’s financial
support for Ukraine is spent domestically on manufacturing arms for export. Is
that bad?
Is the nationalist wing of the GOP — a coalition that has
warmed to the reliable failure of government economic planning (which they
euphemistically call “industrial policy,” of which the armaments industry is
perhaps the prime example) — now suddenly hostile to the roughly 400,000
Americans who work in and around the firearms and armaments industries? Are the
government contracts that sustain that industry the problem? Should the U.S.
stop accepting lucrative arms contracts abroad from America’s allies and
partners, which would prove a boon to America’s competitors in Europe, Russia,
and China? Or is this merely a primal lament over the imperfect world into
which we were born, in which bombs and bullets flow freely but a child
somewhere has gone to bed hungry?
Among those who “know what time it is” and possess the kind of common touch that can only be cultivated by spending all one’s time on Twitter, Pino has said, “the quiet part out loud.” They appear to believe that their argument makes itself. It does not.
No comments:
Post a Comment