National Review Online
Wednesday, June 14, 2017
The attempted murder of several Republican members of
Congress on Wednesday morning in Alexandria, Va., is nothing short of
horrifying. At around 7 a.m., James Hodgkinson, 66, of Belvedere, Ill., opened
fire on Republicans practicing for Thursday evening’s annual congressional
baseball game, striking majority whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana, two
congressional aides, and two Capitol Police officers.
It is an extraordinary mercy that no one was killed. (As
of this writing, Scalise remains in critical condition.) The gunman, who had
several magazines, managed to unload several dozen rifle rounds into the
ballfield over the course of about ten minutes. His apprehension was thanks
entirely to the heroics of the Capitol Police officers who were present, one of
whom continued to return fire even after being hit.
Hodgkinson, who died of his wounds, is a familiar sort.
He had a history of arrests for violent offenses, among them domestic battery,
battery, and aggravated assault. In 2006, he was detained for allegedly
shooting at a man during a confrontation; the man, who was not hit, claimed
that Hodgkinson had assaulted his girlfriend (a friend of Hodgkinson’s foster
daughter, whom he reportedly abused). According to news reports, Hodgkinson
abandoned his wife last month and moved to Alexandria, Va., where he had been
living for two months, possibly out of a local gym.
Among profiles of mass shooters, “isolated” and “had a
history of violence” are hardly rare qualities. Of course, Hodginkson was also
politically outspoken. He campaigned for Bernie Sanders during the 2016
Democratic primary, and posted frequently about politics on his social-media
accounts. He was also a member of a Facebook group that aimed to “terminate the
Republican party,” and in March he wrote that Donald Trump was a “traitor” and
that it was “time to destroy Trump & Co.” There appears, too, to have been
a political element to the attack. According to multiple Republican congressmen
who left the ballfield just before the shooting occurred, Hodgkinson approached
them and asked them whether it was Democrats or Republicans in the field. A few
minutes later, he opened fire.
By our lights, the person singly responsible for
Wednesday’s horrors is the man who pulled the trigger. Nonetheless, a pattern
of violence is difficult to ignore. Hodginkson’s would-be massacre comes on the
heels an attempt last month to run GOP congressman David Kustoff (Tenn.) off
the road for supporting the House’s Obamacare-replacement bill, of credible
threats of violence against Oregon’s Multnomah County Republican party in April
(serious enough that local officials canceled an annual parade, where party
members were slated to appear), of a series of violent attacks by
“anti-fascists,” and of the firebombing of a GOP headquarters in North Carolina
during the election cycle. Recent weeks have seen a glut of wishful thinking
about a Trump assassination, most obviously the macabre hijinks of Kathy
Griffin. A few on the left have encouraged these episodes; most have been
silent.
The contrast to the reaction to the shooting of Gabrielle
Giffords in 2011 is, needless to say, striking. Left-wing activists,
politicians, and journalists leapt to blame Sarah Palin for the shooting that
killed six people and injured 13 others, citing maps she distributed that
showed bulls-eyes atop “targeted” swing districts. Paul Krugman penned a column
entitled “Climate of Hate,” blaming the shooting on the “toxic rhetoric . . .
coming, overwhelmingly, from the right.” The New York Times editorial board declared it “legitimate to hold
Republicans and particularly their most virulent supporters in the media
responsible” for the violence. Bernie Sanders, who denounced today’s shooting
in categorical terms, used Giffords’s shooting to fundraise, sending out an
e-mail to supporters that blamed the shooting on “right-wing reactionaries.”
“Nobody can honestly express surprise that such a tragedy finally occurred,” he
wrote.
The atmosphere of our politics has without question
become more heated of late. Elements of both left and right are to blame for
that, up to and including the president, who was not above encouraging his
supporters to rough up political opponents and the members of the media at his
campaign rallies. But anything that has occurred on the right has been seen and
raised on the left, and, even worse, supplied with sophisticated (and
sophistical) defenses.
James Hodgkinson was a man with violent tendencies who
seems increasingly to have been living less in the real world than in his own
head. That he was influenced by intemperate rhetoric is almost certainly the
case. The deranged find excuses. Nonetheless, “The Resistance” is no more
responsible for him than the pro-life movement is responsible for Robert Dear.
In this particular case, our friends on the other side of
the aisle seem to agree with that sentiment: that political speech is not
violence, and violence is not political speech. Would that it were always so.
No comments:
Post a Comment