By Jonathan V. Last
Friday, June 02, 2017
So far as I can tell, I was patient zero for
anti-anti-anti-Trumpism: the philosophy which says that it is not enough to
avoid the subject of Donald Trump by criticizing the various hucksters, idiots,
SJWs, and partisans who criticize him. Because President Donald Trump is the
leader of the free world and they are not. He is the thing.
And yet, the last 24 hours have made the strongest
possible case for being anti-anti-Trump.
The Paris climate accords are a sham. They have been a
sham from the beginning. As Oren Cass put it Thursday night, the accords failed
not in Paris, but in Lima, in 2014. The Paris accords themselves were merely an
attempt to paper
over substantive failure with a gaudy hootenanny of international virtue
signaling.
People seem to have forgotten that—aside from the
foundational question of balancing carbon emissions, conservation, and economic
development—the Paris agreement allowed countries to set their own goals and
then ostentatiously provided no consequences for countries which then failed to
meet them. An honest supporter of Paris might say that, whatever its
substantive failings, the agreement was a symbolic success that eventually become a gateway to actual policy
change.
But that's the best argument you can make for Paris: That
it's symbolism that might someday become a Trojan horse.
So whether you thought America should stay or leave the
Paris agreement, that's what you were fighting over.
All of which, to be honest, made the case for leaving a
bit dubious. As Tony Mecia argued earlier in the week, going to the trouble of
leaving the Paris accords could just as well enhance the mirage of their
legitimacy. It would have been better, as a matter of statecraft, to follow
their logic by simply pursuing America's economic interests while staying in
them.
And yet, the reaction of the left to Trump's announcement
that he's pulling America out of this sham "agreement" almost makes
it worth it.
After sticking by Trump in the face of The Wall and the
Muslim Ban—both of which have as much real-world impact as the Paris accords,
which is to say, none—Elon Musk and Bob Iger pulled out of their involvement
with White House advisory groups. Liberals on the Twitters lost their minds.
Garments were rent; teeth gnashed.
Here's the thing about virtue signaling: Sure, it's an
empty gesture, but usually it's an empty gesture about something real. It would
have been good to have gone after Boko Haram to #bringbackourgirls. Changing
your Twitter icon to support the Iranian democracy movement was silly, but the
Iranian dissidents were real people trying to overthrow real autocrats at the
risk of real retaliation. The signaling was about real virtue.
But the left's reaction to Trump's Paris pull-out is
something entirely new. It's virtue signaling about virtue signaling. It's like the cold-fusion of virtue
signaling: the moment when the reaction becomes self-sustaining.
If there was ever a moment to indulge in
anti-anti-Trumpism, this is it.
No comments:
Post a Comment